Skip to content

Comments

Add monitoring only option - Bitcoin and ebpf-extractor already running#19

Merged
m4ycon merged 1 commit intoClubeBitcoinUnB:masterfrom
deadmanoz:monitoring-only-option
Jan 7, 2026
Merged

Add monitoring only option - Bitcoin and ebpf-extractor already running#19
m4ycon merged 1 commit intoClubeBitcoinUnB:masterfrom
deadmanoz:monitoring-only-option

Conversation

@deadmanoz
Copy link
Contributor

I'm running this because I already have a Bitcoin node with the ebpf-extractor and rpc-extractor running alongside.

Might be useful for others too?

Copy link
Collaborator

@m4ycon m4ycon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. I was thinking if this couldn't be a profile, but the default profile must run node+extractor and I don't think adding something to "exclude" the default services would fit well.

Anyway, I like it, you even documented it, very good ^^

Pipe failed but its not because of something you've done, we'll work on that before merge this one.

@m4ycon
Copy link
Collaborator

m4ycon commented Nov 6, 2025

@deadmanoz, can you update it with master, please? Now things are working fine, sorry that it took so long, people were focused on other problems.

@deadmanoz deadmanoz force-pushed the monitoring-only-option branch from b40f921 to f554998 Compare January 7, 2026 02:49
@deadmanoz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @m4ycon

Also apologies for taking so long, I have rebased to master and pushed.

@m4ycon m4ycon merged commit 535e519 into ClubeBitcoinUnB:master Jan 7, 2026
1 check passed
@m4ycon
Copy link
Collaborator

m4ycon commented Jan 7, 2026

@deadmanoz No problem, didn't wanna mess with your commits at the time, then I ended up forgetting too hehe. Thanks very much!

@deadmanoz deadmanoz deleted the monitoring-only-option branch January 8, 2026 05:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants