Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for modern .NET to AppServices library #576

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

Sergio0694
Copy link
Member

This PR adds support for .NET 8 to the AppServices library (including UWP on .NET 9).

@Sergio0694 Sergio0694 added the enhancement Improvement to an existing feature label Oct 11, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Arlodotexe Arlodotexe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Broadly, we're still not quite ready to ship modern .NET for UWP in the Toolkit. AppServices is one component where WinUI 2 with modern .NET isn't needed, but TFM support is added via our tooling and applies to all components in the solution.

If you only need NuGet packages, you can build locally and output NuGet packages with our component build script:

.\tooling\Build-Toolkit-Components.ps1 -MultiTargets uwp -winui 2 -Components AppServices -PreviewVersion local -NupkgOutput ./some/output/path -Release

While the code changes to AppServices here seem good, we need to make sure tooling is sorted for all components before we try to enable this and merge it in.

@Arlodotexe Arlodotexe changed the base branch from main to uwp-net8-windows October 14, 2024 19:36
@Sergio0694 Sergio0694 force-pushed the user/sergiopedri/uwp-net9-appservices branch from 5fc22ee to d423cfe Compare October 14, 2024 19:51
@Arlodotexe Arlodotexe merged commit c9ed532 into uwp-net8-windows Oct 14, 2024
2 checks passed
@Arlodotexe Arlodotexe deleted the user/sergiopedri/uwp-net9-appservices branch October 14, 2024 19:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement to an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants