Skip to content

Conversation

Qelxiros
Copy link
Contributor

@Qelxiros Qelxiros commented Oct 3, 2024

Check one:

  • Semantic Change: something about the meaning of the text is different
  • Non-semantic Change: Spelling, grammar, or formatting changes.

Summary of change(s):
Change the current Expectations of Voting Members section to be the Qualifications section, and add the expectation that voting members vote at six weeks.
Also add a clause that allows voting members to opt out of six weeks, thus lowering quorum.

Copy link
Contributor

@rhochgraf21 rhochgraf21 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couple of questions, couple of proposed language changes, couple of formatting things to be fixed.


\asubsubsection{Expectations of Voting Members}
\begin{enumerate}
\item Attend and vote at the Intro Eval for which they have qualified.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

formatting rec - merge into above list.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are two distinct lists with distinct meanings.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think they can be merged easily, and then we don't the very strange case where we have an enumerated list with one item.

For example, instead of 290-292, what if we put "Attend and vote at the Intro Eval, if eligible." at line 288?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The first list is Qualifications; the second is expectations. Merging them doesn't make sense to me. I also don't see an issue with having a one-element list.

@rhochgraf21 rhochgraf21 self-requested a review October 9, 2024 15:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants