State recover: Blobscan and Execution Layer client

[jpnovais]

Note

Need to define

group = 'build.linea.staterecover'

because of this issue

Otherwise, if a module depends on jvm-libs:linea:core:domain-models and staterecover:appcore:domain-models it will have issues, only one gets imported because both have same end module domain-models

Checklist

• I wrote new tests for my new core changes.
• I have successfully ran tests, style checker and build against my new changes locally.
• I have informed the team of any breaking changes if there are any.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.66%. Comparing base (24366fc) to head (b949b89).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head b949b89 differs from pull request most recent head 6786c65

Please upload reports for the commit 6786c65 to get more accurate results.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...c/main/kotlin/net/consensys/ByteArrayExtensions.kt	60.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #238      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     71.68%   71.66%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     1086     1085       -1     
============================================
  Files           299      299              
  Lines         12140    12145       +5     
  Branches       1082     1083       +1     
============================================
+ Hits           8702     8704       +2     
- Misses         2948     2949       +1     
- Partials        490      492       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
hardhat	98.67% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from cc438a6
kotlin	69.48% <60.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...c/main/kotlin/net/consensys/ByteArrayExtensions.kt	84.84% <60.00%> (-4.44%)	⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[jonesho]

LGTM, with minor suggestions

[jpnovais]

@jonesho addressed your feedback. Please take a look, thanks.