Skip to content

Conversation

@esezen
Copy link
Contributor

@esezen esezen commented Jan 29, 2026

No description provided.

@esezen esezen marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2026 11:22
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 29, 2026 11:22
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR configures the Claude code review workflow to hide previous comments by enabling the hide_previous_comments flag.

Changes:

  • Added configuration parameter to hide previous review comments in the Claude workflow

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@constructor-claude-bedrock
Copy link

Code Review Results

✅ Strengths

The change is minimal, well-scoped, and adds a useful configuration option to reduce noise in PR comments.

🚨 Critical Issues

None identified.

⚠️ Important Issues

None identified.

💡 Suggestions

None.

Overall Assessment: ✅ Pass


Analysis

This PR adds the hide_previous_comments: true configuration to the Claude review workflow. The change is:

  • Syntactically correct: The YAML structure is valid with proper indentation
  • Functionally appropriate: This flag will help keep PRs cleaner by hiding previous Claude review comments when new ones are posted
  • Minimal impact: The change only affects the behavior of the Claude review workflow without modifying any application code
  • Well-integrated: The configuration is correctly passed to the reusable workflow with secrets: inherit already in place

The implementation follows GitHub Actions best practices for using reusable workflows with input parameters.

@esezen esezen merged commit ba0fdb0 into main Jan 29, 2026
10 checks passed
@esezen esezen deleted the cdx-364-update-claude-code-review-with-hide-flag branch January 29, 2026 11:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants