Implement search functions only with fzf-for-js 🍽️
#72
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@CoralPink has exceeded the limit for the number of files or commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe project has undergone a significant update, primarily around the search functionality. The Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ? TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to filter (1)
- book.toml
Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/gh-pages.yml (1 hunks)
- debug.sh (1 hunks)
- js/searcher.js (4 hunks)
- js/serviceworker.js (1 hunks)
- theme/index.hbs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- debug.sh
- js/serviceworker.js
Additional comments: 6
.github/workflows/gh-pages.yml (1)
- 85-85: The removal of
elasticlunr.min.jsis consistent with the PR's objective to transition search functionality tofzf-for-js. Ensure that there are no other references toelasticlunr.min.jsin the workflow file or other build scripts that might still expect this file to be present.Verification successful
The shell script output confirms that the only reference to
elasticlunr.min.jsin the workflow files is the line that removes it, which is in alignment with the PR's objective to removeelasticlunrentirely. There are no other references to this file in the workflow files, which suggests that the cleanup of build artifacts related toelasticlunrhas been appropriately handled in the.github/workflows/gh-pages.ymlfile.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to 'elasticlunr.min.js' in the workflow files. rg --type yaml 'elasticlunr.min.js' .github/workflows/Length of output: 128
js/searcher.js (4)
18-20: The addition of
fzfandstoreDocsis consistent with the PR's objective to transition tofzf-for-jsexclusively and removeelasticlunr.31-44: The new implementation of search results using
fzfseems to be logically correct. It fetches results based on the search term, processes them, and displays them accordingly.92-109: The initialization of
storeDocsandfzfis done correctly, and the configuration offzfis in line with the application's needs. Ensure that the removal oflunrIndexandsearchConfigdoes not affect other parts of the application that might have relied on them.Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that there are no remaining references to
lunrIndexorsearchConfigin the codebase. The removal of these variables fromjs/searcher.jsappears to be clean and should not cause any unresolved dependencies or issues.* 89-112: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [15-160]Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to lunrIndex or searchConfig in the codebase. rg --type js 'lunrIndex|searchConfig'Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to lunrIndex or searchConfig in all files within the codebase. rg 'lunrIndex|searchConfig'Length of output: 29
Ensure that the removal of
elasticlunrhas been fully accounted for and that there are no orphaned references or artifacts left in the project.Verification successful
The search results indicate that
elasticlunris referenced in a commented line withindebug.sh, which seems to be related to cleanup and is not an active code reference. Additionally,elasticlunris found inCargo.lockwithin themdbook-footnotedirectory, which is part of the Rust backend and not the JavaScript frontend that was refactored. This suggests that the removal ofelasticlunrfrom the JavaScript codebase has been properly accounted for, and there are no orphaned references or artifacts left in the JavaScript portion of the project.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to elasticlunr in the codebase. rg --type js 'elasticlunr'Length of output: 26
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to elasticlunr in the entire codebase. rg 'elasticlunr'Length of output: 162
theme/index.hbs (1)
- 111-116: The changes in the
theme/index.hbsfile correctly reflect the removal of theelasticlunr.min.jsscript tag, which is in line with the PR's objective to transition exclusively tofzf-for-jsfor search functionality. The remaining script tags forbook.jsandsearcher.jssuggest that these scripts have been updated to work withoutelasticlunr. Ensure that the removal ofelasticlunrdoes not impact any other functionality that may have depended on it.Verification successful
The executed scripts confirm that
elasticlunr.min.jsis not referenced in thetheme/index.hbsfile, nor in the JavaScript filesbook.jsandsearcher.js. To ensure there are no indirect dependencies onelasticlunrelsewhere in the codebase, I will perform a search across all files.
The search across the codebase found a commented-out reference to
elasticlunrindebug.shand a dependency namedelasticlunr-rsinCargo.lockwithin themdbook-footnotedirectory. The commented-out line indebug.shis not active code and thus not a concern. Theelasticlunr-rsreference inCargo.lockappears to be a Rust-related dependency and is not directly related to the JavaScript changes being made in the PR. There are no indications of broken references or dependencies in the JavaScript code due to the removal ofelasticlunr.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that no other script tags or inline scripts depend on elasticlunr.min.js rg --type html '<script' theme/index.hbs | grep 'elasticlunr' # Verify that book.js and searcher.js do not reference elasticlunr rg --type js 'elasticlunr' js/book.js js/searcher.jsLength of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search the entire codebase for references to elasticlunr rg 'elasticlunr'Length of output: 162
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
I've also incorporated the comment modification! I'm going to merge them! |
The search functionality, which until now has been implemented in
mdbookby overridingelasticlunrwithfzf-for-js, can now be done using onlyfzf-for-js.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Chores
Style
Bug Fixes