Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update types to cosmwasm 2.0 version #515

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

Update types to cosmwasm 2.0 version #515

merged 8 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

chipshort
Copy link
Collaborator

based on (and merging into) #509

I went through the 2.0 changelog and checked all types listed there. Hope I didn't miss anything.

types/ibc_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
types/submessages.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@webmaster128 webmaster128 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very very nice. We need a paragraph on MIGRATING for this since callers have to be changes

types/types.go Show resolved Hide resolved
types/types_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
types/types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@chipshort
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I rebased this, changed the Array to deserialize to empty slice for null and [], added the test cases and added some more documentation and migrating info. I think this can be rereviewed.

Base automatically changed from 490-update-cosmwasm to main February 1, 2024 15:06
Copy link
Member

@webmaster128 webmaster128 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Super nice

@chipshort chipshort merged commit 7a6da63 into main Feb 1, 2024
13 checks passed
@chipshort chipshort deleted the update-types branch February 1, 2024 16:54
@chipshort chipshort mentioned this pull request Feb 5, 2024
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants