Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for std::atomic in variadic function when ACE_HAS_DUMP is defined. Fixes #2326. #2334

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

bbronk01
Copy link
Contributor

@bbronk01 bbronk01 commented Feb 18, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced system reliability in handling concurrent operations by updating internal thread interaction methods. This improvement reduces the risk of data inconsistencies during high-load activity and promotes more stable performance. Though these changes occur behind the scenes, they contribute to a smoother, more robust experience when managing simultaneous processes, ensuring overall stability for end-users.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Walkthrough

In the ACE/ace/Barrier.cpp file, the dump method within the ACE_Sub_Barrier class has been updated. Instead of accessing running_threads_ directly, the code now calls this->running_threads_.load(), ensuring a thread-safe retrieval of its value. No other functional changes were made, and the public API remains the same.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
ACE/ace/Barrier.cpp Updated the dump method in ACE_Sub_Barrier to use running_threads_.load() for thread-safe access

Poem

I’m just a bunny coding by,
Threads and loads now safer to spy,
With an atomic hop I make a tweak,
Ensuring sanity when threads speak,
In this code burrow, all’s aligned—oh my!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 94721e3 and fb6bd2d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ACE/ace/Barrier.cpp (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
ACE/ace/Barrier.cpp (1)

28-28:

❓ Verification inconclusive

LGTM! The change improves thread safety in the dump method.

The use of .load() ensures thread-safe access to the atomic variable in the dump method.

The other direct accesses to running_threads_ appear to be thread-safe as they are protected by mutex locks:

  • In wait(): Protected by ACE_GUARD_RETURN (ACE_Thread_Mutex, ace_mon, this->lock_, -1)
  • In shutdown(): Protected by ACE_GUARD_RETURN (ACE_Thread_Mutex, ace_mon, this->lock_, -1)

Let's verify the type of running_threads_ to confirm it's atomic:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the declaration of running_threads_
ast-grep --pattern 'class ACE_Sub_Barrier {
  $$$
  $_running_threads_$_
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 254


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for occurrences of "running_threads_" in the Barrier.cpp file to locate its declaration and usages.
grep -R "running_threads_" -n ACE/ace/Barrier.cpp

# Additionally, check for usage of std::atomic in Barrier.cpp to verify the atomic type of running_threads_
grep -R "std::atomic<" -n ACE/ace/Barrier.cpp

Length of output: 449


LGTM – but please verify the type declaration for running_threads_.

The change in the dump method to use .load() is an appropriate update to ensure thread-safe reading of the atomic variable for diagnostic output. Our review of the file shows that:

  • The dump method now correctly calls .load() (line 28), which improves thread safety.
  • Other accesses to running_threads_ (lines 92, 97, 104, 107, and 142) are within guarded sections (using mutex locks), so they remain thread-safe under the current design.

However, since our search in Barrier.cpp did not find a direct reference to std::atomic<...> for running_threads_, please verify (likely in the corresponding header file) that running_threads_ is indeed declared as an atomic type. Once that confirmation is provided, no further changes are necessary.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jwillemsen jwillemsen merged commit 77b19b8 into DOCGroup:master Feb 19, 2025
46 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Barrier.cpp fails compilation with ACE_HAS_DUMP defined in Visual Studio 2022.
2 participants