-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
Fixing time synchronisation for PhotonBacktracker for ProtoDUNE HD MC. #139
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
I have observed the backtracker did not match OpHits to correct true particles and in general it failed to find corresponding true depositions. Looking at the OpFlash times w.r.t. the true times, the flash times came 250 us earlier. This fix is configuring the backtracker to account for that.
|
Hi Viktor, the backtracker used to work well... Might this delay be related to the pretrigger in the SPE template (either during the digitization or during the deconvolution? |
@jroto Hi Jose. If you are referring to the deconvolved waveforms, those were not present in my tests. The offset is present in the PDHD 2024 production, which still has the old waveform sims and no deconvolution applied. Also, I note that the offset is -250 MICROseconds! The original FD configuration was +260 NANOseconds. O(100 us) should not be a result of a pretrigger window. It may be that the signal sims were misconfigured. I may take a look later. But for now, this configuration works with the official production. See the attached plot for DT between recob::OpFlash::Time() and MCTruth generation time - pairing all true cosmic muons with all reco flashes. |
|
This is very strange... |
|
I think it should be related with this Pretrigger in the digitizer: |
|
Here's how TBH I don't see how any of this should introduce -250 us offset. |
|
Another thought on the matter. This 250 us may be related to the TPC pretrigger configuration. |
|
I think so, should be related to that. |
|
Yes, 250 us is the TPC pre-trigger. This is indeed strange... |
|
Any updates on reviewing this PR? I can try to merge it Friday morning Chicago time if we can get it approved in time. |
I have converted this to a draft PR. We don't have concensus if this fix is needed. It is needed for the current MC PDHD production, however, current simulations might not need it. We would need someone to test if the |

I have observed the backtracker did not match OpHits to correct true particles and in general it failed to find corresponding true depositions. Looking at the OpFlash times w.r.t. the true times, the flash times came 250 us earlier. This fix is configuring the backtracker to account for that.