Skip to content

Support P256 network curve in API calls #16

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

Support P256 network curve in API calls #16

merged 13 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

johnmaguire
Copy link
Member

@johnmaguire johnmaguire commented Nov 11, 2024

Depends on #17.

This PR adds PrivateKey, PublicKey, and TrustedKey types for handling host keys and CA keys. dnapi will always send both P256 and Ed25519 keys with enrollment requests. From that point forward, dnapi will only generate keys of the type used in prior requests.

dnapi does not attempt to "filter" trusted keys to only the curve supported by Nebula. In other words, a P256 network requires P256 CAs and host keys, but does not necessarily require P256 trusted keys. Do we want to add enforcement here?

Some code was moved into a keys sub-package in order to allow dnapitest to import it, while still allowing the dnapi package to import dnapitest. The bulk of this code is tested through a call to DoUpdate.

@johnmaguire johnmaguire changed the title Support P256 network curve in enroll call Support P256 network curve in API calls Dec 3, 2024
@johnmaguire johnmaguire marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2024 16:25
@johnmaguire johnmaguire changed the base branch from main to go-1.22 December 5, 2024 16:28
Base automatically changed from go-1.22 to main December 5, 2024 16:32
brad-defined
brad-defined previously approved these changes Dec 5, 2024
brad-defined
brad-defined previously approved these changes Dec 5, 2024
@johnmaguire johnmaguire merged commit 9f2241d into main Dec 5, 2024
2 checks passed
@johnmaguire johnmaguire deleted the p256 branch December 5, 2024 18:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants