forked from milady-ai/milady
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
π‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix authentication bypass via deceptive loopback hostnames #140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
Dexploarer
wants to merge
1
commit into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
sentinel/fix-loopback-validation-12356812126411277806
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
| ## 2025-05-14 - Loose Loopback Validation | ||
| **Vulnerability:** `isLoopbackBindHost` incorrectly identified any hostname starting with "127." (e.g., `127.example.com`) as a loopback address. This could bypass the automatic API token generation for non-loopback binds (`ensureApiTokenForBindHost`), potentially exposing the API without authentication if a user binds to such a hostname that resolves to a public IP. | ||
| **Learning:** String prefix matching is insufficient for validating loopback addresses when hostnames are involved. Public DNS records can point to public IPs while having names that mimic private IP ranges. | ||
| **Prevention:** Always validate resolved IP addresses or use strict IP matching logic (like `net.isIP`) when enforcing network security policies based on address ranges. Do not rely on hostname patterns for security decisions. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Inconsistent logging assertion:
The test case for '127.example.com' (lines 49-57) verifies token generation but does not assert that the generated token is not logged, unlike the previous test for '0.0.0.0:2138'. This results in inconsistent coverage regarding the logging of sensitive information.
Recommendation:
Add an assertion similar to the previous test to ensure that the generated token is not present in any logger.warn messages: