Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

refactor: use literal syntax instead of function calls to create data structure #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

refactor: use literal syntax instead of function calls to create data structure #5

merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

deepsource-autofix[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Using the literal syntax can give minor performance bumps compared to using function calls to create dict, list and tuple.

@deepsource-autofix
refactor: use literal syntax instead of function calls to create data…
52023b0 
… structure

Using the literal syntax can give minor performance bumps compared to using function calls to create `dict`, `list` and `tuple`.
@deepsource-io deepsource.io
Copy link
Contributor

deepsource-io bot commented May 31, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 5d5dd48..52023b0. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Python LogoPython✅ Success
🎯 1 occurence resolved
View Check ↗
💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@DubiousCactus DubiousCactus merged commit d9f1967 into main May 31, 2024
2 checks passed
@DubiousCactus DubiousCactus deleted the deepsource-autofix-37f4919d branch May 31, 2024 15:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@DubiousCactus