-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding non-standard ways to use EESSI #387
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
True, in my Ubuntu works but seems that its because I have CVMFS already available, I tested it in other systems without CVMFS and the same error message shows :( |
clarirfication for cvmfsexec
orted_wrapper_dir=$(dirname $0) | ||
export PATH=$(echo $PATH | tr ':' '\n' | grep -v $orted_wrapper_dir | tr '\n' ':') | ||
|
||
~/bin/cvmfsexec_eessi.sh orted "$@" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this work? I imagine that you need to load the modules you need in your cvmfsexec_eessi.sh
script or it will not find orted
inside the container
docs/getting_access/non_standard.md
Outdated
|
||
## Via `squashfs` + cvmfs's `shrinkwrap` utility | ||
|
||
CernVM-FS provides the Shrinkwrap utility, allowing users to create a portable snapshot of a CVMFS repository. This can be exported and distributed without the need of a CVMFS client or network access. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should link to the CVMFS docs on this early on.
Co-authored-by: ocaisa <alan.ocais@cecam.org>
Co-authored-by: ocaisa <alan.ocais@cecam.org>
Co-authored-by: ocaisa <alan.ocais@cecam.org>
Co-authored-by: ocaisa <alan.ocais@cecam.org>
As per this issue: https://gitlab.com/eessi/support/-/issues/119
First batch regarding the cvmfsexec usage. A couple of thoughts:
Not sure why it mentions rpm if its a deb system, specially if in my ubuntu worked. Tbh I think their environment was polluted by some local testing they were doing and we will try again later, but I paste it here just to have it in mind in case we see it again.