-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
Move benchmarks to separate repository to reduce repo size #2504
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
DeepeshWR
wants to merge
1
commit into
EnzymeAD:main
Choose a base branch
from
DeepeshWR:separate-benchmarks
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
The table of contents is too big for display.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Binary file not shown.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
instead of asking to clone, can we use something like
Enzyme/enzyme/BCLoad/CMakeLists.txt
Line 23 in aecafad
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implemented the changes as described above, ensuring that nothing is modified except for enabling the "-DENZYME_RUN_BENCHMARKS=ON" flag to run benchmarks. ExternalProject_Add() functions differently by cloning and making the benchmark sources available only during the Enzyme build. Consequently, using add_subdirectory(benchmarks) would fail at configuration time. This approach allows us to include the benchmarks while preserving the original behaviour of how they were configured and built in Enzyme’s CMakeLists.txt. For reference, I have pushed the benchmark sources to my GitHub. Please let me know if this approach is acceptable to you.
[Testing]
cd /path/to/Enzyme/enzyme
rmdir benchmarks
mkdir build && cd build
cmake -G Ninja .. -DLLVM_DIR=/path/to/llvm/lib/cmake/llvm -DLLVM_EXTERNAL_LIT=/path/to/lit/lit.py -DENZYME_ENABLE_PLUGINS=ON -DENZYME_RUN_BENCHMARKS=ON
ninja
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be instead preferable to move clear the soruce out of the benchmarks/CMakeLists.txt dir, and add another ExternalProejct add to get the source / input data instead [that cmake already has externalproject adds for the other tools].
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is my approach is fine or am I overlooking something ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just wondering if anyone has had the opportunity to review the above patch? Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Gentle reminder on this PR.