Introduce plist.err and parse --status

analyzer/codechecker_analyzer/analyzers/clangsa/result_handler.py

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 from typing import Optional
 
 from codechecker_report_converter.report.parser.base import AnalyzerInfo
-from codechecker_report_converter.report import report_file
+from codechecker_report_converter.report import report_file, error_file
 from codechecker_report_converter.report.hash import get_report_hash, HashType
 from codechecker_common.logger import get_logger
 from codechecker_common.skiplist_handler import SkipListHandlers
@@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ def postprocess_result(
         Generate analyzer result output file which can be parsed and stored
         into the database.
         """
+        error_file.update(
+            self.analyzer_result_file, self.analyzer_returncode,
+            self.analyzer_info, self.analyzer_cmd,
+            self.analyzer_stdout, self.analyzer_stderr)
+
         if os.path.exists(self.analyzer_result_file):
             reports = report_file.get_reports(
                 self.analyzer_result_file, self.checker_labels,

analyzer/codechecker_analyzer/analyzers/clangtidy/result_handler.py

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
     AnalyzerResult
 from codechecker_report_converter.analyzers.clang_tidy.parser import Parser
 from codechecker_report_converter.report.parser.base import AnalyzerInfo
-from codechecker_report_converter.report import report_file
+from codechecker_report_converter.report import report_file, error_file
 from codechecker_report_converter.report.hash import get_report_hash, HashType
 
 from codechecker_common.logger import get_logger
@@ -76,3 +76,8 @@ def postprocess_result(
         report_file.create(
             self.analyzer_result_file, reports, self.checker_labels,
             self.analyzer_info)
+
+        error_file.update(
+            self.analyzer_result_file, self.analyzer_returncode,
+            self.analyzer_info, self.analyzer_cmd,
+            self.analyzer_stdout, self.analyzer_stderr)

analyzer/codechecker_analyzer/analyzers/cppcheck/result_handler.py

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 from codechecker_report_converter.analyzers.cppcheck.analyzer_result import \
     AnalyzerResult
 from codechecker_report_converter.report import BugPathEvent, \
-        Range, report_file
+        Range, report_file, error_file
 from codechecker_report_converter.report.hash import get_report_hash, HashType
 
 from codechecker_common.logger import get_logger
@@ -95,3 +95,8 @@ def postprocess_result(
         report_file.create(
             self.analyzer_result_file, reports, self.checker_labels,
             self.analyzer_info)
+
+        error_file.update(
+            self.analyzer_result_file, self.analyzer_returncode,
+            self.analyzer_info, self.analyzer_cmd,
+            self.analyzer_stdout, self.analyzer_stderr)

analyzer/codechecker_analyzer/analyzers/gcc/result_handler.py

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 from codechecker_report_converter.report.parser.base import AnalyzerInfo
 from codechecker_report_converter.analyzers.gcc.analyzer_result import \
     AnalyzerResult
-from codechecker_report_converter.report import report_file
+from codechecker_report_converter.report import report_file, error_file
 from codechecker_report_converter.report.hash import get_report_hash, HashType
 
 from codechecker_common.logger import get_logger
@@ -118,3 +118,8 @@ def postprocess_result(
         report_file.create(
             self.analyzer_result_file, reports, self.checker_labels,
             self.analyzer_info)
+
+        error_file.update(
+            self.analyzer_result_file, self.analyzer_returncode,
+            self.analyzer_info, self.analyzer_cmd,
+            self.analyzer_stdout, self.analyzer_stderr)

analyzer/codechecker_analyzer/analyzers/infer/result_handler.py

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 from codechecker_report_converter.report.parser.base import AnalyzerInfo
 from codechecker_report_converter.analyzers.infer.analyzer_result import \
     AnalyzerResult
-from codechecker_report_converter.report import report_file
+from codechecker_report_converter.report import report_file, error_file
 from codechecker_report_converter.report.hash import get_report_hash, HashType
 
 from codechecker_common.logger import get_logger
@@ -74,4 +74,9 @@ def postprocess_result(
             self.analyzer_result_file, reports, self.checker_labels,
             self.analyzer_info)
 
+        error_file.update(
+            self.analyzer_result_file, self.analyzer_returncode,
+            self.analyzer_info, self.analyzer_cmd,
+            self.analyzer_stdout, self.analyzer_stderr)
+
         shutil.rmtree(Path(self.workspace, "infer", self.buildaction_hash))

analyzer/codechecker_analyzer/analyzers/result_handler_base.py

@@ -9,14 +9,13 @@
 Result handlers to manage the output of the static analyzers.
 """
 
-import hashlib
 import os
-import shlex
 
 from abc import ABCMeta
 from typing import Optional
 
 from codechecker_analyzer import analyzer_context
+from codechecker_analyzer.util import analyzer_action_hash
 from codechecker_common.logger import get_logger
 from codechecker_common.skiplist_handler import SkipListHandlers
 from codechecker_common.review_status_handler import ReviewStatusHandler
@@ -99,43 +98,10 @@ def analyzer_action_str(self):
         """
         analyzed_file_name = os.path.basename(self.analyzed_source_file)
 
-        source_file = os.path.normpath(
-            os.path.join(self.buildaction.directory,
-                         self.analyzed_source_file))
-
-        # In case of "make 4.3" depending on compile-time options "make" tool
-        # can be built so a subprocess named cc1build will be logged by
-        # "CodeChecker log".
-        # See posix_spawn() option:
-        # https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2020-01/msg00004.html
-        # In this case the -o output argument of cc1build command is a randomly
-        # named temporary file. We can't afford dynamic parts in the original
-        # build command, because its hash is used for identification in the
-        # plist file name.
-        #
-        # The proper logging of this "make 4.3" version has been done in
-        # bf140d6, so it is unlikely happen that two build actions differ only
-        # in their "-o" flags. This workaround is still kept for any case.
-        #
-        # Note that some information loss occurs during the following algorithm
-        # because ' '.join(shlex.split(cmd)) is not necessarily equal to cmd:
-        # g++ -DVAR="hello world" main.cpp
-
-        args = shlex.split(self.buildaction.original_command)
-        indices = [idx for idx, v in enumerate(args) if v.startswith('-o')]
-
-        for idx in reversed(indices):
-            # Output can be given separate or joint:
-            # -o a.out vs. -oa.out
-            # In the first case we delete its argument too.
-            if args[idx] == '-o':
-                del args[idx]
-            del args[idx]
-
-        build_info = source_file + '_' + ' '.join(args)
-
         self.buildaction_hash = \
-            hashlib.md5(build_info.encode(errors='ignore')).hexdigest()
+            analyzer_action_hash(self.analyzed_source_file,
+                                 self.buildaction.directory,
+                                 self.buildaction.original_command)
 
         return analyzed_file_name + '_' + \
             str(self.buildaction.analyzer_type) + '_' + \