Shorten CTA wording for reviewers, voting, and planning

[hypha]

Closes #999
Made them all fit into three lines as well 😅

[github-actions]

Preview available

Key	Value
url	https://ep2025-shorten-cta-wording.ep-preview.click
last update	2025-02-10T11:37:05.891Z

[clytaemnestra]

Overall LGTM and thank you very much for the initiative!

Be part of the reviewer team! YOUR insights help us curate a diverse and high-quality programme.

• I'd consider changing reviewer team to team that reviews talk proposals, because to a newbie it might not be clear what do they review
• I'm not sure if the word curate is well-known to non-native speakers, maybe creates?

Share your thoughts and suggestions in our planning survey! Help us build a conference that works for YOU!

• I'd maybe add ... suggestions what is missing at EP - people are usually quick to criticize and I think we can ride that wave and use their feedback. If it sounds too negative, then maybe what you would like to see at EP
  EDIT: I meant the first sentence as Share your thoughts what is missing at EP. or alternatively Share your suggestions what would you like to see at EP. Also not to repeat planning survey in the title + first sentence.

These are my suggestions and nitpicks, feel free to disregard if it doesn't make sense to you 🙂

[hypha]

Thanks for the reviews, @clytaemnestra!

I'd consider changing reviewer team to team that reviews talk proposals, because to a newbie it might not be clear what do they review.

Alright! Changed in 4325f72.

I'm not sure if the word curate is well-known to non-native speakers, maybe creates?

The word curate (or a related form of it) exists in many Indo-European languages, so I’m not too concerned about comprehension. But I’ve changed it to creates in 4325f72 as suggested, since it also works well.

I'd maybe add ... suggestions what is missing at EP - people are usually quick to criticize and I think we can ride that wave and use their feedback. If it sounds too negative, then maybe what you would like to see at EP
EDIT: I meant the first sentence as Share your thoughts what is missing at EP. or alternatively Share your suggestions what would you like to see at EP. Also not to repeat planning survey in the title + first sentence.

I’ve reworded it to be slightly more open-ended in 4325f72, as I felt what’s missing suggests only new additions, while what you’d like to see could steer responses too much toward programme-related suggestions. I’d like to encourage broader feedback, including thoughts on existing elements that could be improved. Let me know what you think. Happy to adjust!

[clytaemnestra]

Looks great, thank you!