Conversation
Preview available
|
|
Most notably, there is a card in the centre of the main page that talks about the CfP but I don't know what to replace it with 🤷. |
src/content/pages/faq.mdx
Outdated
| <li>**3 February 2025:** Call for Proposals (CfP) closes (<b>Extension</b>)</li> | ||
| </ul> | ||
|
|
||
| <ul className="milestone-todo"> | ||
| <li><strike>**27 January 2025:** Call for Proposals (CfP) closes</strike></li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| <li>**3 February 2025:** Call for Proposals (CfP) closes (<b>Extension</b>)</li> | |
| </ul> | |
| <ul className="milestone-todo"> | |
| <li><strike>**27 January 2025:** Call for Proposals (CfP) closes</strike></li> | |
| <li>**27 January 2025:** Call for Proposals (CfP) closes</li> | |
| <li>**3 February 2025:** Extension of Call for Proposals (CfP) closes</li> | |
| </ul> | |
| <ul className="milestone-todo"> |
Or remove the extension part completely and pretend that we only had this later date.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it makes sense to keep info about the fact that the CFP was extended. See the new version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So you removed the initial closing date for the cfp on purpose now? - Just checking. Not objecting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, because the CfP didn't close on the 27th. Only on the 3rd (after an extension).
Co-authored-by: Cyril Bitterich <cebit-github@gunnet.de>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
cybit
left a comment
cybit
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is just the one thing with double checking if the first cfp end-date was removed on purpose. Rest looks good to me.
3 participants
I used a bit of common sense and my judgment to figure out what needed to be changed but I might be wrong here, so please check my changes ;)