Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixes #17 (for real this time) #19

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Magniquick
Copy link

@Magniquick Magniquick commented Apr 21, 2024

The fix is simple : P
note that even now not all the processes are shown.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved the execution of the ps command by refining the conditional checks in the shell script.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve a modification in the conditional statement related to the 'process ID' group within a shell script. This adjustment affects the execution of the ps command by removing a condition check related to the $group variable, streamlining the script's functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
sources/ps.zsh Modified the conditional statement related to the 'process ID' group, affecting the execution of the ps command. Removed a line that checked for a condition related to the $group variable.

Poem

In the land of code where scripts do dwell,
A change was made, a tale to tell.
The $group condition, now set free,
The ps command runs with glee.
Streamlined paths, no checks to bind,
A smoother flow, with ease you'll find.
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Magniquick
Copy link
Author

Walkthrough

The recent update simplifies a portion of a shell script by removing a conditional check involving the $group variable. This alteration streamlines the execution flow, potentially enhancing performance and reducing complexity.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
sources/ps.zsh Removed conditional check for the $group variable.

🌟🐇✨
A tiny line of code was there,
Guarding the script with utmost care.
But now it's gone, the path is clear,
For simpler code, we give a cheer!
Hop, hop, hooray, the change is here! 🎉
🌟🐇✨

Recent Review Details

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

* Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  
  * `I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.`
  * `Generate unit testing code for this file.`
  * `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.`

* Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  
  * `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.`
  * `@coderabbitai modularize this function.`

* PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  
  * `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.`
  * `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.`
  * `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.`
  * `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.`

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

* `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR.

* `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews.

* `@coderabbitai review` to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.

* `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.

* `@coderabbitai help` to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

* You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository.

* Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information.

* If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json`

Documentation and Community

* Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.

* Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback.

* Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

I haven't actually removed the check, more like a typo fix : P

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 21, 2024

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@Magniquick, thank you for clarifying the nature of the change in the sources/ps.zsh file. It's helpful to know that the modification was a typo fix rather than the removal of a conditional check. I appreciate your attention to detail and for keeping the information accurate. If there's anything else you need assistance with, feel free to ask!


New Learnings Added
User: Magniquick"
PR: Freed-Wu/fzf-tab-source#19
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-04-21T10:12:00.892Z
Learning: The change in the `sources/ps.zsh` file in PR #19 was a typo fix, not the removal of a conditional check involving the `$group` variable.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of specific code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions.

@Magniquick
Copy link
Author

zstyle ':completion:*:*:*:*:processes' command "ps -u $USER -o pid,user,comm -w -w"

does fix all the processes not being completed, but AFAIK, fzf-tab-source only handles previews, right ?

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 619a464 and 51a57f9.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • sources/ps.zsh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • sources/ps.zsh
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
Common learnings
User: Magniquick
PR: Freed-Wu/fzf-tab-source#19
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-04-21T10:12:00.892Z
Learning: The change in the `sources/ps.zsh` file in PR #19 was a typo fix, not the removal of a conditional check involving the `$group` variable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant