Feature/inactive administrative cost

[SvenMokveldje]

Created the inactive administrative cost feature. BAC treasurer can now check who has been inactive at SudoSOS and either send them an notification and after 3 years fine them. This will fine them until they have a balance of 0. After which the BAC treasurer can disable those accounts.

(Auto locking will be added once this is implemented)

You can check inactive users, notify them, handout the administrative costs, create the inactive administrative cost entity and delete it. There is no update function as you would never change the amount (this is fixed) so the only update would be to delete it and lastly get certain entities.

[SvenMokveldje]

For the test fails: The first one, I do not understand why the post-miration-test tries to equal it to 20, as the default_pagination should be either that of process.env which is 20 or the default put in by Samuel which is 25.

The second one, does not fail on my machine (hihi), but as I take a id bigger than that should exist it should be equal to null. But maybe someone with more knowledge can take a crack at it.

[JustSamuel]

@SvenMokveldje small thing I thought about, if we want to deploy this we also need to think about the impact. This is something the BACPM will need to add to her bookkeeping, and therefore should already come with the pdf functionality implemented.

We could make it a different PR, but before deploying this to main it should be possible to get a pdf overview of the handed out administration costs.

Also maybe an interface on the frontend side of things? What do you think.

[SvenMokveldje]

@JustSamuel I can still look into the PDF part as part of this PR as I agree that this should be looked into. It is however a very small things that only happens once a year (at least my idea was to always check it on the first of July or maybe once a quartile). Next to that from what I see, people that do not use it will mostly likely be disabled first by having too many fines.

So, I think in the frontend you could add this to one of the already existing overviews?

[JustSamuel]

quick question @SvenMokveldje, the whole process now works with that the BACPM remembers to do this right? As in everything is done manually?

Maybe we should consider a reminder mail for the BACPM, at the first of july, weekly, until its done?