Suggestions for increased transparency #95
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This PR suggests some text changes to the copy, and adds back a chronology. Because our site is used by: 1. Auditors and auditees submitting audits 2. State auditors (and other entities) responsible for passthrough monitoring 3. Federal audit resolution officials 4. IG offices 5. Grants managers/grants issuing offices 6. GAO 8. OMB 9. The general public 10. ... I think credibility is enhanced by transparency, and because we have a public record of our efforts in this space (our Github repository), I think we should use it to document the actions we've taken so far. For consideration.
|
Updated this branch to include the update for March 19. @danswick this should be the one merged after hours tonight. |
danswick
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR suggests some text changes to the copy, and adds back a chronology.
Because our site is used by:
I think credibility is enhanced by transparency, and because we have a public record of our efforts in this space (our Github repository), I think we should use it to document the actions we've taken so far.
For consideration.