Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/givbacks verification form #4769

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MohammadPCh
Copy link
Collaborator

@MohammadPCh MohammadPCh commented Sep 24, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved error message handling in the verification process for better clarity regarding project verification forms.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated dependency @giveth/ui-design-system to the latest version, which may include bug fixes and minor improvements.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
giveth-dapps-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 24, 2024 9:20am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request includes two main changes: the version update of the @giveth/ui-design-system dependency in the package.json file and modifications to error message handling within the VerificationProvider component in src/context/verification.context.tsx. The dependency version has been incremented from ^1.11.34 to ^1.11.36, while the error message logic has been adjusted to reflect the absence of a "project verification form" instead of a "givbacks eligibility form".

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Updated the version of @giveth/ui-design-system from ^1.11.34 to ^1.11.36.
src/context/verification.context.tsx Modified error message handling to check for the absence of a "project verification form".

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix Button Text #4314: This PR updates the version of the @giveth/ui-design-system dependency in package.json, which is directly related to the version update in the main PR.
  • Fix verify button & tag #4372: This PR modifies the logic related to project verification, which may connect to the changes made in error message handling within the VerificationProvider component in the main PR, particularly regarding the verification form.

🐰 In the garden where changes bloom,
A version update clears the gloom.
With messages refined, oh what a sight,
The project forms now shine so bright!
Hops of joy, let’s celebrate,
For every fix, we elevate! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/context/verification.context.tsx (1)

87-87: Approve the change with a minor suggestion.

The update from "givbacks eligibility form" to "project verification form" is appropriate and aligns with the context of the component. This change improves clarity and consistency in terminology.

Consider a minor improvement to the error message for better grammar:

-case 'There is not any project verification form for this project':
+case 'There is not a project verification form for this project':

This small change enhances readability without altering the functionality.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d56ab9c and accfdd1.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/context/verification.context.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/context/verification.context.tsx (1)

87-87: Verify the impact of the error message change.

The modification of the error message from "givbacks eligibility form" to "project verification form" may have implications in other parts of the application.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce inconsistencies, please run the following script to check for any other occurrences of the old error message:

If any occurrences are found, consider updating them for consistency or verifying if they should remain unchanged.

Verification successful

Manual verification is recommended to ensure no other instances of the old error message exist.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other occurrences of the old error message

# Test: Search for the old error message. Expect: No results.
rg --type typescript --type javascript "There is not any givbacks eligibility form for this project"

# Test: Search for similar error handling patterns. Expect: Consistent use of new terminology.
rg --type typescript --type javascript "There is not a(ny)? .* form for this project"

Length of output: 260


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other occurrences of the old error message in TypeScript files

# Test: Search for the old error message. Expect: No results.
rg --type ts --type tsx "There is not any givbacks eligibility form for this project"

# Test: Search for similar error handling patterns. Expect: Consistent use of new terminology.
rg --type ts --type tsx "There is not a\(ny\)? .* form for this project"

Length of output: 218


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other occurrences of the old error message in TypeScript files

# Test: Search for the old error message. Expect: No results.
rg "There is not any givbacks eligibility form for this project" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

# Test: Search for similar error handling patterns. Expect: Consistent use of new terminology.
rg "There is not a\(ny\)? .* form for this project" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

Length of output: 162

package.json (1)

21-21: Approved: UI Design System dependency update

The update of @giveth/ui-design-system from version ^1.11.34 to ^1.11.36 appears to be a minor patch update, which typically includes bug fixes and small improvements. This change aligns with the PR objective of fixing the givbacks verification form, as it may include UI enhancements or bug fixes relevant to forms.

To ensure a smooth integration:

  1. Please verify the changelog for @giveth/ui-design-system versions 1.11.35 and 1.11.36 to confirm the changes are relevant and don't introduce any breaking changes.
  2. After updating, thoroughly test the givbacks verification form and any other components that use this design system to ensure everything functions as expected.
Verification successful

[/run_scripts]


Verified: UI Design System dependency version

The version of @giveth/ui-design-system has been successfully updated to ^1.11.36 as specified. This update aligns with the PR objective and has been correctly applied.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the installed version of @giveth/ui-design-system

# Test: Check the installed version of @giveth/ui-design-system
npm list @giveth/ui-design-system

# Note: If the above command doesn't work in the CI environment, 
# you may need to install the package first:
# npm install
# Then run the npm list command again.

Length of output: 106


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the version of @giveth/ui-design-system from package.json

# Attempt to use jq for parsing
if command -v jq >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    jq -r '.dependencies["@giveth/ui-design-system"]' package.json
else
    # Fallback to grep and sed if jq is not available
    grep '"@giveth/ui-design-system"' package.json | sed -E 's/.*"@giveth\/ui-design-system":\s*"([^"]+)".*/\1/'
fi

Length of output: 89

Copy link
Collaborator

@kkatusic kkatusic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Meriem-BM Meriem-BM left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks @MohammadPCh

@MohammadPCh MohammadPCh merged commit bbf99fe into develop Sep 24, 2024
3 checks passed
@MohammadPCh MohammadPCh deleted the fix/givbacks-verification-form branch September 24, 2024 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: QA
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants