Skip to content

Conversation

@12wrigja
Copy link
Collaborator

For some environments, it's required that the licence for an OSS project be distributed as part of an application's source code, not as a separate document.

Obligatory not a Lawyer, but I believe the entire content of the Apache 2.0 License is replaceable with the relevant SPDX License identifier.

For some environments, it's required that the licence for an OSS project be distributed as part of an application's source code, not as a separate document.

Obligatory not a Lawyer, but I believe the entire content of the Apache 2.0 License is replaceable with the relevant SPDX License identifier.
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Nov 17, 2021
@12wrigja
Copy link
Collaborator Author

FWIW, this is done for Closure Library: https://github.com/google/closure-library/blob/a6c80eff2422aadb3759608a97c8bb49e8442d3b/closure/goog/base.js#L4

@mathiasbynens it might be good to run this past OSPO? There's also no Copyright notice for JSBI, maybe that needs to updated too?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant