chore: Migrate gsutil usage to gcloud storage#10002
chore: Migrate gsutil usage to gcloud storage#10002bhandarivijay-png wants to merge 1 commit intoGoogleContainerTools:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Hi @ruhi-chaddha, Can we get your review on this PR? Thanks! |
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request completes a significant migration by replacing all occurrences of the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request automates the migration from gsutil to gcloud storage. The changes are mostly correct, but I've found a few issues. In hack/update-lts-dependencies.sh, the --quiet flag is missing from the new gcloud storage cp commands, which was present in the original gsutil commands. More critically, an automated change in vendor/google.golang.org/api/cloudbuild/v1/cloudbuild-api.json has resulted in invalid JSON, which will cause parsing errors. I've provided suggestions to fix these issues.
| "Unspecified defaults to GSUTIL.", | ||
| "Use the \"gsutil\" tool to download the source file.", | ||
| "Use the Cloud Storage Fetcher tool to download the source file." | ||
| "Use the \"gcloud storage\" tool to download the source file.", "Use the Cloud Storage Fetcher tool to download the source file." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This automated change has resulted in invalid JSON. The enumDescriptions array is malformed because two string elements have been merged into a single line without proper separation. This will cause parsing errors. The array should contain three distinct string elements to match the enum field.
"Use the \"gcloud storage\" tool to download the source file.",
"Use the Cloud Storage Fetcher tool to download the source file."|
|
||
| # upload the binary to skaffold gcs bucket | ||
| gsutil -q cp helm.tar.gz gs://skaffold/deps/helm/helm-${HELM_VERSION}-linux-amd64.tar.gz | ||
| gcloud storage cp helm.tar.gz gs://skaffold/deps/helm/helm-${HELM_VERSION}-linux-amd64.tar.gz |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The original gsutil command used the -q flag for quiet output. The migrated gcloud storage cp command should include the --quiet flag to maintain the same behavior and prevent progress indicators from being printed to stdout.
| gcloud storage cp helm.tar.gz gs://skaffold/deps/helm/helm-${HELM_VERSION}-linux-amd64.tar.gz | |
| gcloud storage cp --quiet helm.tar.gz gs://skaffold/deps/helm/helm-${HELM_VERSION}-linux-amd64.tar.gz |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any specific reason why the quiet flag is no longer being included?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The omission of the --quiet flag was an oversight during the initial script conversion. Since the original gsutil command used -q to suppress progress indicators,which is critical for keeping CI/CD logs clean and preventing stdout clutter. we should definitely include it in the cloud storage version to maintain the same behavior. I'll update the migration logic to ensure this flag is preserved.
|
|
||
| # upload the binary to skaffold gcs bucket | ||
| gsutil -q cp kustomize.tar.gz gs://skaffold/deps/kustomize/v${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}/kustomize_v${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gz | ||
| gcloud storage cp kustomize.tar.gz gs://skaffold/deps/kustomize/v${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}/kustomize_v${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gz |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The original gsutil command used the -q flag for quiet output. The migrated gcloud storage cp command should include the --quiet flag to maintain the same behavior and prevent progress indicators from being printed to stdout.
| gcloud storage cp kustomize.tar.gz gs://skaffold/deps/kustomize/v${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}/kustomize_v${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gz | |
| gcloud storage cp --quiet kustomize.tar.gz gs://skaffold/deps/kustomize/v${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}/kustomize_v${KUSTOMIZE_VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gz |
|
|
||
| # upload the binary to skaffold gcs bucket | ||
| gsutil -q cp kpt gs://skaffold/deps/kpt/v${KPT_VERSION}/kpt_linux_amd64 | ||
| gcloud storage cp kpt gs://skaffold/deps/kpt/v${KPT_VERSION}/kpt_linux_amd64 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The original gsutil command used the -q flag for quiet output. The migrated gcloud storage cp command should include the --quiet flag to maintain the same behavior and prevent progress indicators from being printed to stdout.
| gcloud storage cp kpt gs://skaffold/deps/kpt/v${KPT_VERSION}/kpt_linux_amd64 | |
| gcloud storage cp --quiet kpt gs://skaffold/deps/kpt/v${KPT_VERSION}/kpt_linux_amd64 |
menahyouyeah
added
kokoro:force-run
4 participants
Automated: Migrate {target_path} from gsutil to gcloud storage
This CL is part of the on going effort to migrate from the legacy
gsutiltool to the new and improvedgcloud storagecommand-line interface.gcloud storageis the recommended and modern tool for interacting with Google Cloud Storage, offering better performance, unified authentication, and a more consistent command structure with othergcloudcomponents. 🚀Automation Details
This change was generated automatically by an agent that targets users of
gsutil.The transformations applied are based on the gsutil to gcloud storage migration guide.
While we have based the automation on the migration guide, every use case is unique.
It is crucial that you thoroughly test these changes in environments appropriate to your use-case before merging.
Be aware of potential differences between
gsutilandgcloud storagethat could impact your workflows.For instance, the structure of command output may have changed, requiring updates to any scripts that parse it. Similarly, command behavior can differ subtly; the
gcloud storage rsynccommand has a different file deletion logic thangsutil rsync, which could lead to unintended file deletions.Our migration guides can help guide you through a list of mappings and some notable differences between the two tools.
Standard presubmit tests are run as part of this CL's workflow. If you need to target an additional test workflow or require assistance with testing, please let us know.
Please verify that all your Cloud Storage operations continue to work as expected to avoid any potential disruptions in production.
Support and Collaboration
The
GCS CLIteam is here to help! If you encounter any issues, have a complex use case that this automated change doesn't cover, or face any other blockers, please don't hesitate to reach out.We are happy to work with you to test and adjust these changes as needed.
Contact:
gcs-cli-hyd@google.comWe appreciate your partnership in this important migration effort!
#gsutil-migration