Skip to content

Comments

AI assessment by handit.ai for Handit-AI/invoice-copilot#3

Open
handit-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
ai-assessment-1755715335582
Open

AI assessment by handit.ai for Handit-AI/invoice-copilot#3
handit-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
ai-assessment-1755715335582

Conversation

@handit-ai
Copy link

@handit-ai handit-ai bot commented Aug 20, 2025

AI Review – Prompt Best Practices

Service: Invoice Copilot
Model: gpt-4o-mini (prod)
Repo scan date: 2025-08-20
Assessor: handit assess (repo-only, no production data)

1) Scorecard

Criterion Data Analysis Assistant
Context & Rationale (0–5) 2
Format/Output Contract 1
Examples & Edge Cases 0
Determinism & Guardrails 1
Testability 1

Overall Risk: 🔴 High (single prompt)

2) Risk Heatmap (top issues)

  • Lack of explicit output format → May lead to inconsistent outputs (🔴 High)
  • No examples or edge cases provided → Reduces reliability in varied scenarios (🔴 High)
  • Minimal context and rationale → Limits alignment with user needs (🔶 Medium)

3) Findings & Improvement Levers

A. Prompt: Data Analysis Assistant

Original

You are a helpful assistant that specializes in data analysis.
...

Strengths

  • Assigns a clear role or persona to the AI, which can help in maintaining a consistent style and expertise.

Risks

  • The prompt lacks explicit instructions on the desired output format, which can lead to inconsistent responses.
  • No examples or edge cases are provided, reducing the model's ability to handle varied scenarios effectively.
  • Minimal context and rationale are given, which may limit the model's alignment with specific user needs.
  • Absence of determinism and guardrails could lead to unpredictable outputs.

Improvement Levers (not fixes)

  • Add explicit output format instructions: Specify the structure or sections required in the response to improve consistency (Best Practice 5).
  • Include examples and edge cases: Provide few-shot examples to guide the model in handling different scenarios (Best Practice 3).
  • Enhance context and rationale: Offer more background information to better align the model's responses with user expectations (Best Practice 2).
  • Implement guardrails: Set explicit constraints on length, tone, and format to ensure predictable outputs (Best Practice 9).

Evidence (static scan)

The prompt is minimalistic and lacks detailed instructions or examples, which are critical for ensuring reliable and consistent AI behavior.
→ Potential production impact includes inconsistent data analysis outputs and reduced user satisfaction.

4) Next Steps (with handit)

  1. Connect handit (1-line setup)
  2. Run baseline evals on your real logs: Evaluate consistency and alignment with user needs.
  3. handit will experiment with improvements automatically.
  4. If a candidate passes tests on your real data, handit opens the PR.

5) Business Impact (expected if improved)

  • Increased consistency and reliability in AI outputs, leading to higher user satisfaction and trust.
  • Improved handling of diverse scenarios through the inclusion of examples and edge cases, enhancing the model's versatility.
  • Better alignment with user needs by providing more context and rationale, potentially increasing the adoption and effectiveness of the service.

This PR was automatically generated by handit.ai Autonomous engineer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants