Added multicite-versions of biblatex-commands #3527
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #3524
Summary of additions and changes
Inconistency in biblatex documentation
The biblatex documentation defines
\fvolcite
and\ftvolcite
, but defines multicite-versions of\fvolcite
and\Fvolcite
.So for some reason the documentation of biblatex defines a multicite-version of a non-existent command (
\Fvolcite
), while not defining one for an existing one (\ftvolcite
).As
\fvolcite
and\ftvolcite
are based on\footcite
and\footcitetext
I think a captalized version of either does not exist.On the other hand I don't know if
\Fvolcites
actually exists, and if it does, if it's a multicite-version for\ftvolcite
or if there maybe is another undocumented one for that.biblatex documentation (page 115)
Didn't have the time to really analyse/test this yet. Maybe someone else knows more about this or can find out more.
How to test this pull request