Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cbmc 6.3.0 #191209

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

cbmc 6.3.0 #191209

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link

This is to replace #191202 as it requires removal of a prior patch.

  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

@github-actions github-actions bot added autosquash Automatically squash pull request commits according to Homebrew style. rust Rust use is a significant feature of the PR or issue java Java use is a significant feature of the PR or issue long build Set a long timeout for formula testing labels Sep 19, 2024
@tautschnig tautschnig mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Copy link
Member

@carlocab carlocab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the autosquash Automatically squash pull request commits according to Homebrew style. label Sep 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for contributing to Homebrew! 🎉 It looks like you're having trouble with a CI failure. See our contribution guide for help. You may be most interested in the section on dealing with CI failures. You can find the CI logs in the Checks tab of your pull request.

@carlocab
Copy link
Member

Seems to fail with newer Clang:

  __libcheck.c:1138:55: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1138 |   while((__CPROVER_size_t)__CPROVER_POINTER_OFFSET(arg.__stack) <
        |                                                    ~~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1139:34: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1139 |         __CPROVER_OBJECT_SIZE(arg.__stack))
        |                               ~~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1196:55: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1196 |   while((__CPROVER_size_t)__CPROVER_POINTER_OFFSET(arg.__stack) <
        |                                                    ~~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1197:34: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1197 |         __CPROVER_OBJECT_SIZE(arg.__stack))
        |                               ~~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1342:55: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1342 |   while((__CPROVER_size_t)__CPROVER_POINTER_OFFSET(arg.__stack) <
        |                                                    ~~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1343:34: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1343 |         __CPROVER_OBJECT_SIZE(arg.__stack))
        |                               ~~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1386:55: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1386 |   while((__CPROVER_size_t)__CPROVER_POINTER_OFFSET(arg.__stack) <
        |                                                    ~~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1387:34: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1387 |         __CPROVER_OBJECT_SIZE(arg.__stack))
        |                               ~~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1831:54: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1831 |   while((__CPROVER_size_t)__CPROVER_POINTER_OFFSET(ap.__stack) <
        |                                                    ~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1832:33: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1832 |         __CPROVER_OBJECT_SIZE(ap.__stack))
        |                               ~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1837:67: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1837 |       __CPROVER_POINTER_OBJECT(str) != __CPROVER_POINTER_OBJECT(ap.__stack),
        |                                                                 ~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1891:54: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1891 |   while((__CPROVER_size_t)__CPROVER_POINTER_OFFSET(ap.__stack) <
        |                                                    ~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1892:33: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1892 |         __CPROVER_OBJECT_SIZE(ap.__stack))
        |                               ~~^~~~~~~~
  __libcheck.c:1897:67: error: member reference base type 'va_list' (aka 'char *') is not a structure or union
   1897 |       __CPROVER_POINTER_OBJECT(str) != __CPROVER_POINTER_OBJECT(ap.__stack),
        |                                                                 ~~^~~~~~~~
  14 errors generated.

https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/actions/runs/10939506036/job/30370052416?pr=191209#step:3:1365

@carlocab carlocab added the CI-no-fail-fast Continue CI tests despite failing GitHub Actions matrix builds. label Sep 19, 2024
- Revert 6.2.0 patch

The problem has been addressed upstream (the patch itself was a
cherry-pick from upstream).

Co-authored-by: Michael Tautschnig <tautschn@amazon.com>
@tautschnig
Copy link
Author

Seems to fail with newer Clang:

Err, thank you, we'll have to create a 6.3.1 bug-fixing release.

@carlocab
Copy link
Member

carlocab commented Sep 19, 2024

Actually, it's not really a newer Clang. Seems to be specific to arm64, though no idea if it'll reproduce on Linux arm64.

@chenrui333
Copy link
Member

#191262

@chenrui333 chenrui333 added the superseded PR was replaced by another PR label Sep 19, 2024
@tautschnig
Copy link
Author

Closing in favour of 191262.

@tautschnig tautschnig closed this Sep 19, 2024
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the bump-cbmc-6.3.0 branch September 19, 2024 18:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI-no-fail-fast Continue CI tests despite failing GitHub Actions matrix builds. java Java use is a significant feature of the PR or issue long build Set a long timeout for formula testing rust Rust use is a significant feature of the PR or issue superseded PR was replaced by another PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants