Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @lwsinclair, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request integrates an external security validation badge into the project's main documentation. The change aims to publicly display a third-party security assessment, offering users a quick reference to the project's security posture as evaluated by MseeP.ai.
Highlights
- README Update: I've added a MseeP.ai security assessment badge to the very top of the
README.mdfile. This badge is an image that links directly to the MseeP.ai security assessment page forhormold-cognition-wheel, providing a quick visual indicator of the project's security status as assessed by MseeP.ai.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
| [](https://mseep.ai/app/hormold-cognition-wheel) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better document structure and readability, it's conventional to place badges after the main project title (<h1>). The project title should be the first prominent element in the README.md to immediately orient visitors.
Please consider moving the badge to appear after the title and the main description.
Example placement:
# Cognition Wheel MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that implements a "wisdom of crowds" approach to AI reasoning by consulting multiple state-of-the-art language models in parallel and synthesizing their responses.
[](https://mseep.ai/app/hormold-cognition-wheel)
Hi there,
This pull request shares a security update on cognition-wheel.
We also have an entry for cognition-wheel in our directory, MseeP.ai, where we provide regular security and trust updates on your app.
We invite you to add our badge for your MCP server to your README to help your users learn from a third party that provides ongoing validation of cognition-wheel.
You can easily take control over your listing for free: visit it at https://mseep.ai/app/hormold-cognition-wheel.
Yours Sincerely,
Lawrence W. Sinclair
CEO/SkyDeck AI
Founder of MseeP.ai
MCP servers you can trust
Here are our latest evaluation results of cognition-wheel
Security Scan Results
Security Score: 100/100
Risk Level: low
Scan Date: 2025-06-30
Score starts at 100, deducts points for security issues, and adds points for security best practices
This security assessment was conducted by MseeP.ai, an independent security validation service for MCP servers. Visit our website to learn more about our security reviews.