Deprecating RBF options in ALMAOpy

[andrewlee94]

Addresses #1223

Summary/Motivation:

The current implementation of ALAMOpy does not work if radial basis function options are included. We currently do not have the resources to implement support for these, so this PR adds a check for cases where the user selects these options and raises a ConfigurationError if they are selected.

Changes proposed in this PR:

Legal Acknowledgement

By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution:

1. I agree my contributions are submitted under the license terms described in the LICENSE.txt file at the top level of this directory.
2. I represent I am authorized to make the contributions and grant the license. If my employer has rights to intellectual property that includes these contributions, I represent that I have received permission to make contributions and grant the required license on behalf of that employer.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: -0.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (a03ea47) 76.84% compared to head (fbc72e0) 76.83%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1226      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.84%   76.83%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         390      390              
  Lines       61873    61875       +2     
  Branches    11388    11389       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        47545    47544       -1     
- Misses      11866    11870       +4     
+ Partials     2462     2461       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
idaes/core/surrogate/alamopy.py	80.82% <100.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.