test: multiple coins final tests #186
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates introduce support for handling multiple coins across various modules ( Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (11)
x/stakers/spec/03_messages.md (4)
Line range hint
10-10: Add a comma after "address".- for each address. The sender can specify an amount which in turn is a direct + for each address. The sender can specify an amount, which in turn is a direct
Line range hint
25-25: Add a comma after "passed".- After the `CommissionChangeTime` has passed the new commission is applied. + After the `CommissionChangeTime` has passed, the new commission is applied.
Line range hint
50-50: Add a comma after "passed".- After the `LeavePoolTime` has passed the valaccount is deleted and the staker can shut down the protocol node. + After the `LeavePoolTime` has passed, the valaccount is deleted and the staker can shut down the protocol node.
Line range hint
51-51: Add a newline at the end of the file.} +proto/kyve/stakers/v1beta1/events.proto (1)
5-6: Ensure that the new imports are necessary and used within the file. If they are not used, consider removing them to keep the code clean.x/stakers/keeper/logic_stakers.go (1)
19-19: Consider adding a log message here to indicate that the amount is empty and no action will be taken. This can help with debugging and understanding the flow of the code.if amount.Empty() { ctx.Logger().Info("No commission rewards to increase, amount is empty.") return nil }x/stakers/spec/07_exported.md (2)
Line range hint
16-16: Replace hard tabs with spaces for consistency and to avoid formatting issues.- LeavePool(ctx sdk.Context, staker string, poolId uint64) + LeavePool(ctx sdk.Context, staker string, poolId uint64)
Line range hint
24-24: Replace hard tabs with spaces for consistency and to avoid formatting issues.- GetCommission(ctx sdk.Context, stakerAddress string) sdk.Dec + GetCommission(ctx sdk.Context, stakerAddress string) sdk.Decproto/kyve/stakers/v1beta1/stakers.proto (1)
5-6: Ensure that the new imports are necessary and used within the file. If they are not used, consider removing them to keep the code clean.x/stakers/spec/05_events.md (1)
Line range hint
157-157: Files should end with a single newline character to avoid potential issues with version control systems and to follow best practices.-} \ No newline at end of file +}proto/kyve/stakers/v1beta1/tx.proto (1)
5-6: Ensure that the new imports are necessary and used within the file. If they are not used, consider removing them to keep the code clean.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
x/query/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/stakers/types/events.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/stakers/types/stakers.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/stakers/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (25)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- docs/static/openapi.yml (6 hunks)
- proto/kyve/query/v1beta1/query.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/kyve/stakers/v1beta1/events.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/kyve/stakers/v1beta1/stakers.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/kyve/stakers/v1beta1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- testutil/integration/checks.go (1 hunks)
- testutil/integration/helpers.go (1 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_funding_bundles_test.go (13 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (28 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_stakers_leave_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go (18 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_zero_delegation_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles.go (1 hunks)
- x/bundles/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- x/stakers/client/cli/tx_claim_commission_rewards.go (2 hunks)
- x/stakers/keeper/getters_staker.go (1 hunks)
- x/stakers/keeper/keeper_suite_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/stakers/keeper/logic_stakers.go (3 hunks)
- x/stakers/keeper/msg_server_claim_commission_rewards.go (2 hunks)
- x/stakers/keeper/msg_server_claim_commission_rewards_test.go (6 hunks)
- x/stakers/spec/03_messages.md (1 hunks)
- x/stakers/spec/05_events.md (1 hunks)
- x/stakers/spec/07_exported.md (1 hunks)
- x/stakers/types/message_claim_commission_rewards.go (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (2)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- x/stakers/keeper/keeper_suite_test.go
Additional comments not posted (125)
x/stakers/client/cli/tx_claim_commission_rewards.go (1)
8-8: LGTM! The change to parse the amount assdk.Coinsis appropriate for handling multiple coins.x/stakers/types/message_claim_commission_rewards.go (1)
42-45: LGTM! The validation logic forsdk.Coinsis correctly implemented.x/stakers/keeper/msg_server_claim_commission_rewards.go (3)
24-25: LGTM! The logic for checking if the amount can be claimed is correctly implemented.
29-30: LGTM! The logic for transferringsdk.Coinsis correctly implemented.
35-35: LGTM! The logic for updating the staker's commission rewards is correctly implemented.testutil/integration/helpers.go (1)
8-16: LGTM! The function correctly retrieves and returns the coins from the community pool.x/bundles/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
31-31: LGTM! The change to acceptsdk.Coinsis appropriate for handling multiple coins.proto/kyve/stakers/v1beta1/events.proto (1)
71-76: Theamountfield inEventClaimCommissionRewardshas been correctly updated to support multiple coins. The annotations ensure proper handling of repeated fields.x/stakers/keeper/logic_stakers.go (2)
17-17: The method signature forIncreaseStakerCommissionRewardshas been correctly updated to acceptsdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64. This change aligns with the new requirement to handle multiple coins.
29-29: The method for transferring funds has been correctly updated to useSendCoinsFromModuleToModuleto handle multiple coins. Ensure that this method is properly tested to verify the transfer of multiple coins.x/stakers/spec/07_exported.md (1)
68-68: The documentation for theIncreaseStakerCommissionRewardsfunction has been correctly updated to reflect the new signature that acceptssdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64. Ensure that all references to this function in the documentation are consistent with this change.proto/kyve/stakers/v1beta1/stakers.proto (1)
31-36: Thecommission_rewardsfield in theStakermessage has been correctly updated to support multiple coins. The annotations ensure proper handling of repeated fields.x/stakers/spec/05_events.md (1)
101-106: The documentation for theEventClaimCommissionRewardsevent has been correctly updated to reflect the newamountfield that supports multiple coins. Ensure that all references to this event in the documentation are consistent with this change.proto/kyve/stakers/v1beta1/tx.proto (1)
93-97: Theamountfield in theMsgClaimCommissionRewardsmessage has been correctly updated to support multiple coins. The annotations ensure proper handling of repeated fields.proto/kyve/query/v1beta1/query.proto (1)
132-137: Updatecommission_rewardsfield to support multiple coins.The changes to the
commission_rewardsfield in theStakerMetadatamessage correctly update it to support multiple coins usingrepeated cosmos.base.v1beta1.Coin. This is consistent with the overall goal of supporting multiple coins.x/stakers/keeper/getters_staker.go (1)
42-45: UpdateupdateStakerCommissionRewardsto handlesdk.Coins.The changes to the
updateStakerCommissionRewardsfunction correctly update it to handlesdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64. This aligns with the goal of supporting multiple coins.CHANGELOG.md (3)
21-21: Add changelog entry for multiple coins support instakersmodule.The changelog entry correctly describes the support for multiple coins in the
stakersmodule.
22-22: Add changelog entry for multiple coins support inbundlesmodule.The changelog entry correctly describes the support for multiple coins in the
bundlesmodule.
23-23: Add changelog entry for multiple coins support infundersmodule.The changelog entry correctly describes the support for multiple coins in the
fundersmodule.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_stakers_leave_test.go (1)
257-257: Update assertion to handle multiple coins correctly.The assertion for
uploader.CommissionRewardshas been updated to check the amount of a specific denomination. This change ensures that the test correctly handles multiple coins.x/stakers/keeper/msg_server_claim_commission_rewards_test.go (11)
199-211: The test case "Produce a valid bundle and check commission rewards" is well-structured and covers the necessary assertions for verifying the commission rewards. Good job!
221-238: The test case "Claim with non-staker account" correctly verifies that an error is returned when a non-staker account attempts to claim rewards. Well done!
242-260: The test case "Claim more rewards than available" correctly verifies that an error is returned when attempting to claim more rewards than available. Good job!
264-279: The test case "Claim zero rewards" correctly verifies that claiming zero rewards does not alter the commission rewards. Well done!
281-296: The test case "Claim partial rewards" correctly verifies that claiming partial rewards correctly updates the commission rewards. Good job!
299-368: The test case "Claim partial rewards twice" correctly verifies that claiming partial rewards twice correctly updates the commission rewards. Well done!
370-385: The test case "Claim all rewards" correctly verifies that claiming all rewards correctly updates the commission rewards. Good job!
388-459: The test case "Claim multiple coins" correctly verifies that claiming multiple coins correctly updates the commission rewards. Well done!
461-535: The test case "Claim one coin of multiple coins" correctly verifies that claiming one coin of multiple coins correctly updates the commission rewards. Good job!
Line range hint
537-614: The test case "Claim more rewards than available with multiple coins" correctly verifies that an error is returned when attempting to claim more rewards than available with multiple coins. Well done!
616-689: The test case "Claim coin which does not exist" correctly verifies that an error is returned when attempting to claim a coin that does not exist. Good job!testutil/integration/checks.go (2)
169-172: Correctly updated to handlesdk.Coinsfor expected balance.
176-178: Correctly updated to handlesdk.Coinsfor actual balance.x/bundles/keeper/logic_bundles.go (15)
588-588: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in uploader rewards.The change to handle multiple coins in uploader rewards looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for uploader rewards.
Line range hint
288-288: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in storage cost calculation.The change to handle multiple coins in storage cost calculation looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for storage costs.
Line range hint
278-278: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in treasury payouts.The change to handle multiple coins in treasury payouts looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for treasury payouts.
Line range hint
298-298: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in delegation rewards.The change to handle multiple coins in delegation rewards looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for delegation rewards.
Line range hint
308-308: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in uploader commission.The change to handle multiple coins in uploader commission looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for uploader commission.
Line range hint
578-578: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in treasury rewards.The change to handle multiple coins in treasury rewards looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for treasury rewards.
588-588: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in uploader rewards.The change to handle multiple coins in uploader rewards looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for uploader rewards.
Line range hint
598-598: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in delegator rewards.The change to handle multiple coins in delegator rewards looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for delegator rewards.
Line range hint
608-608: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in staker slashing.The change to handle multiple coins in staker slashing looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for staker slashing.
Line range hint
618-618: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in tally result.The change to handle multiple coins in tally result looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for tally result.
Line range hint
268-268: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in total payout calculation.The change to handle multiple coins in total payout calculation looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for total payout calculation.
Line range hint
298-298: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in commission rewards calculation.The change to handle multiple coins in commission rewards calculation looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for commission rewards calculation.
Line range hint
288-288: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in uploader storage cost calculation.The change to handle multiple coins in uploader storage cost calculation looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for uploader storage cost calculation.
Line range hint
278-278: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in treasury payout calculation.The change to handle multiple coins in treasury payout calculation looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for treasury payout calculation.
Line range hint
268-268: Ensure correct handling of multiple coins in total payout calculation.The change to handle multiple coins in total payout calculation looks correct. However, please verify that all relevant parts of the codebase correctly handle
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64for total payout calculation.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_zero_delegation_test.go (2)
8-8: Import aliasglobaltypesis used correctly.
476-476: Ensure the correct denomination is used in the assertion.Please verify that
globaltypes.Denomis the correct denomination for the assertion.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_funding_bundles_test.go (3)
773-845: The test case "Produce a valid bundle with only one funder and multiple coins" is well-structured and covers the necessary assertions. Good job!
847-932: The test case "Produce a valid bundle with multiple funders and multiple coins" is well-structured and covers the necessary assertions. Good job!
934-1019: The test case "Produce a valid bundle although the only funder can not pay for the full bundle reward" is well-structured and covers the necessary assertions. Good job!x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (37)
11-11: Importingsdkas an alias is a good practice for readability and consistency.
36-39: The added test cases for multiple coins funded with different inflation splitting percentages are well-documented and cover various scenarios. This enhances the test coverage significantly.
45-46: DefiningamountPerBundleas a variable at the beginning of the test suite improves readability and maintainability.
71-75: Setting the storage cost parameter ensures that the tests are run with the correct configuration. This is a good practice to ensure consistency across test runs.
76-102: The addition of multiple coin entries in the funders' parameters is well-structured. It ensures that the tests cover scenarios with different coin denominations and weights.
186-186: The addition ofGetCoinsFromCommunityPoolis a useful helper function to retrieve the state of the community pool, which is essential for validating the test outcomes.
219-219: The assertion for empty commission rewards is correct and ensures that the expected state is validated.
225-228: The assertion for the treasury payout when inflation is zero is correctly implemented. It ensures that no unexpected payouts occur.
298-298: The calculation and assertion of the inflation payout are correctly implemented. This ensures that the payout logic is validated accurately.
305-310: The detailed comments explaining the calculation of commission and delegation rewards are very helpful for understanding the logic. The assertions are correctly implemented.
383-383: The calculation and assertion of the inflation payout for 100% inflation splitting are correctly implemented. This ensures that the payout logic is validated accurately.
390-395: The detailed comments explaining the calculation of commission and delegation rewards for 100% inflation splitting are very helpful for understanding the logic. The assertions are correctly implemented.
420-427: The funding transactions for Alice and Bob are correctly implemented, ensuring that the pool is funded with sufficient amounts for the test scenarios.
455-455: The addition ofGetCoinsFromCommunityPoolis a useful helper function to retrieve the state of the community pool, which is essential for validating the test outcomes.
484-493: The detailed comments explaining the calculation of commission and delegation rewards are very helpful for understanding the logic. The assertions are correctly implemented.
497-503: The assertion for the treasury payout when inflation is zero is correctly implemented. It ensures that no unexpected payouts occur.
525-532: The funding transactions for Alice and Bob are correctly implemented, ensuring that the pool is funded with sufficient amounts for the test scenarios.
587-599: The detailed comments explaining the calculation of commission and delegation rewards for 10% inflation splitting are very helpful for understanding the logic. The assertions are correctly implemented.
723-730: The funding transactions for Alice and Bob are correctly implemented, ensuring that the pool is funded with insufficient amounts for the test scenarios.
758-758: The addition ofGetCoinsFromCommunityPoolis a useful helper function to retrieve the state of the community pool, which is essential for validating the test outcomes.
790-795: The detailed comments explaining the calculation of commission and delegation rewards for insufficient funders are very helpful for understanding the logic. The assertions are correctly implemented.
799-805: The assertion for the treasury payout when inflation is zero is correctly implemented. It ensures that no unexpected payouts occur.
827-834: The funding transactions for Alice and Bob are correctly implemented, ensuring that the pool is funded with insufficient amounts for the test scenarios.
889-901: The detailed comments explaining the calculation of commission and delegation rewards for 30% inflation splitting are very helpful for understanding the logic. The assertions are correctly implemented.
926-933: The funding transactions for Alice and Bob are correctly implemented, ensuring that the pool is funded with insufficient amounts for the test scenarios.
988-1000: The detailed comments explaining the calculation of commission and delegation rewards for 10% inflation splitting are very helpful for understanding the logic. The assertions are correctly implemented.
1025-1032: The funding transactions for Alice and Bob are correctly implemented, ensuring that the pool is funded with some insufficient amounts for the test scenarios.
1060-1060: The addition ofGetCoinsFromCommunityPoolis a useful helper function to retrieve the state of the community pool, which is essential for validating the test outcomes.
1092-1097: The detailed comments explaining the calculation of commission and delegation rewards for some insufficient funders are very helpful for understanding the logic. The assertions are correctly implemented.
1101-1107: The assertion for the treasury payout when inflation is zero is correctly implemented. It ensures that no unexpected payouts occur.
1129-1136: The funding transactions for Alice and Bob are correctly implemented, ensuring that the pool is funded with some insufficient amounts for the test scenarios.
1191-1203: The detailed comments explaining the calculation of commission and delegation rewards for 30% inflation splitting are very helpful for understanding the logic. The assertions are correctly implemented.
1228-1235: The funding transactions for Alice and Bob are correctly implemented, ensuring that the pool is funded with some insufficient amounts for the test scenarios.
1290-1302: The detailed comments explaining the calculation of commission and delegation rewards for 100% inflation splitting are very helpful for understanding the logic. The assertions are correctly implemented.
1311-1413: The test case for multiple coins funded with 0% inflation splitting is comprehensive and correctly implemented. It ensures that the logic for handling multiple coins is validated.
1415-1523: The test case for multiple coins funded with 10% inflation splitting is comprehensive and correctly implemented. It ensures that the logic for handling multiple coins is validated.
1525-1632: The test case for multiple coins funded with 100% inflation splitting is comprehensive and correctly implemented. It ensures that the logic for handling multiple coins is validated.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go (29)
28-30: Good addition of test cases for multiple validators and multiple coins scenarios. This ensures comprehensive coverage for the new feature.
36-51: The initialization of balances for multiple stakers and validators is correctly done. This setup is crucial for the subsequent assertions.
79-82: Setting the storage cost to 0.5 is a good step to ensure the test case covers the scenario where storage costs are involved.
84-110: The funders' parameters are set correctly, including multiple coins with different weights. This aligns with the PR objective of testing multiple coins.
146-150: Re-initializing the balances after the setup is a good practice to ensure the initial state is correctly captured for assertions.
183-186: Capturing the initial state of the community pool is essential for later assertions on treasury payouts.
255-279: The assertions for uploader and voter balances, rewards, and commission rewards are thorough and correctly implemented. This ensures the integrity of the bundle processing logic.
283-288: The assertion for the treasury payout is correctly implemented, ensuring that the community pool's state is validated.
328-331: Capturing the initial state of the community pool is essential for later assertions on treasury payouts.
400-427: The assertions for uploader and voter balances, rewards, and commission rewards are thorough and correctly implemented. This ensures the integrity of the bundle processing logic.
434-439: The assertion for the treasury payout is correctly implemented, ensuring that the community pool's state is validated.
496-499: Capturing the initial state of the community pool is essential for later assertions on treasury payouts.
568-595: The assertions for uploader and voter balances, rewards, and commission rewards are thorough and correctly implemented. This ensures the integrity of the bundle processing logic.
602-607: The assertion for the treasury payout is correctly implemented, ensuring that the community pool's state is validated.
672-675: Capturing the initial state of the community pool is essential for later assertions on treasury payouts.
744-771: The assertions for uploader and voter balances, rewards, and commission rewards are thorough and correctly implemented. This ensures the integrity of the bundle processing logic.
778-783: The assertion for the treasury payout is correctly implemented, ensuring that the community pool's state is validated.
848-851: Capturing the initial state of the community pool is essential for later assertions on treasury payouts.
Line range hint
920-957: The assertions for uploader and voter balances, rewards, and commission rewards are thorough and correctly implemented. This ensures the integrity of the bundle processing logic.
964-969: The assertion for the treasury payout is correctly implemented, ensuring that the community pool's state is validated.
1007-1010: Capturing the initial state of the community pool is essential for later assertions on treasury payouts.
1079-1103: The assertions for uploader and voter balances, rewards, and commission rewards are thorough and correctly implemented. This ensures the integrity of the bundle processing logic.
1107-1113: The assertion for the treasury payout is correctly implemented, ensuring that the community pool's state is validated.
1150-1153: Capturing the initial state of the community pool is essential for later assertions on treasury payouts.
1219-1243: The assertions for uploader and voter balances, rewards, and commission rewards are thorough and correctly implemented. This ensures the integrity of the bundle processing logic.
1247-1256: The assertion for the treasury payout is correctly implemented, ensuring that the community pool's state is validated.
1484-1487: Capturing the initial state of the community pool is essential for later assertions on treasury payouts.
1553-1577: The assertions for uploader and voter balances, rewards, and commission rewards are thorough and correctly implemented. This ensures the integrity of the bundle processing logic.
1581-1588: The assertion for the treasury payout is correctly implemented, ensuring that the community pool's state is validated.docs/static/openapi.yml (6)
612-631: The changes to thecommission_rewardsfield to support multiple coins look good. The description and properties are accurate.
3946-3965: The changes to thecommission_rewardsfield to support multiple coins are consistent and accurate.
6323-6342: The changes to thecommission_rewardsfield to support multiple coins are consistent and accurate.
6781-6800: The changes to thecommission_rewardsfield to support multiple coins are consistent and accurate.
7345-7364: The changes to thecommission_rewardsfield to support multiple coins are consistent and accurate.
7852-7871: The changes to thecommission_rewardsfield to support multiple coins are consistent and accurate.
# Conflicts: # x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go # x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
x/stakers/spec/03_messages.md (1)
Line range hint
51-51: Please ensure the file ends with a single newline character.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go (1)
7-7: Ensure consistent import aliasing for SDK types.It's good practice to consistently alias imported packages, especially common ones like
sdk. This helps maintain readability and prevents conflicts.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (2)
12-12: Ensure consistent import aliasing for SDK types.It's a good practice to consistently use or avoid aliasing imports unless necessary to resolve conflicts. Here,
sdkis aliased, which is common, but ensure it's consistently used across your project for better readability.
434-434: Ensure consistency in funding amounts per bundle across different funders.It's noted that the
AmountsPerBundlefor both funders are set to the same value. If this is intentional and required by the business logic, consider adding a comment to clarify why this consistency is necessary. If not, this might be an area to allow variability based on funder preferences or strategies.Also applies to: 441-441
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_funding_bundles_test.go (13 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (38 hunks)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go (18 hunks)
- x/stakers/spec/03_messages.md (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (2)
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional context used
LanguageTool
x/stakers/spec/03_messages.md
[uncategorized] ~25-~25: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: .... After theCommissionChangeTimehas passed the new commission is applied. ## `Msg...
[uncategorized] ~50-~50: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ...en pool. After theLeavePoolTimehas passed the valaccount is deleted and the stake...
Markdownlint
x/stakers/spec/03_messages.md
51-51: null (MD047, single-trailing-newline)
Files should end with a single newline character
Additional comments not posted (12)
x/stakers/spec/03_messages.md (2)
36-36: Clarification on multiple coins in commission rewards is clear and aligns with system updates.
Line range hint
25-25: The suggested commas by the static analysis tool are not necessary in this context.Also applies to: 50-50
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_funding_bundles_test.go (5)
8-11: Imports are correctly organized and relevant to the test cases.
36-37: Initialization ofinitialBalanceAliceandinitialBalanceBobis clear and concise.
70-95: The setup for the whitelist parameters is comprehensive and covers multiple scenarios with different coin denominations and weights.
200-211: The assertions for balances and funded amounts are correctly implemented and check the expected outcomes based on the test setup.Also applies to: 281-295, 368-382, 455-473, 543-547, 622-626, 703-707, 833-844, 914-931, 994-1005
145-146: Ensure consistency in the representation of coin amounts across all test cases.Also applies to: 219-220, 226-227, 306-307, 313-314, 393-394, 400-401, 555-556, 562-563, 634-635, 641-642, 776-779, 850-853, 857-860
Verification successful
The representation of coin amounts using
i.ACoinsis consistent across all test cases in the specified file. The values differ as expected for different test scenarios, but the format and usage remain uniform.
- Lines 145-146:
i.ACoins(100 * i.T_KYVE)andi.ACoins(10 * i.T_KYVE)- Lines 219-220, 226-227, 306-307, 313-314, 393-394, 400-401, 555-556, 562-563, 634-635, 641-642, 776-779, 850-853, 857-860: All instances follow the same format.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent representation of coin amounts across test cases. # Test: Search for inconsistent coin amount representations. Expect: Consistent usage. rg --type go $'i.ACoins' x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_funding_bundles_test.goLength of output: 3009
x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_valid_bundles_test.go (2)
186-186: Verify the correctness ofGetCoinsFromCommunityPoolmethod.Verification successful
The implementation of the
GetCoinsFromCommunityPoolmethod is as follows:func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) GetCoinsFromCommunityPool() sdk.Coins { pool, err := suite.App().DistributionKeeper.FeePool.Get(suite.Ctx()) if (err != nil) { return sdk.NewCoins() } coins, _ := pool.CommunityPool.TruncateDecimal() return coins }This method retrieves the community pool from the distribution keeper, handles any errors by returning an empty set of coins, and truncates the decimal values of the coins in the community pool before returning them.
The method appears to be correctly implemented and used consistently across the test files.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of the GetCoinsFromCommunityPool method by checking its implementation and usage across the test suite. # Test: Search for the function usage and implementation. Expect: Correct implementation and consistent usage. rg --type go $'GetCoinsFromCommunityPool'Length of output: 3106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the GetCoinsFromCommunityPool method from the helpers.go file. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (suite *KeeperTestSuite) GetCoinsFromCommunityPool() $_' testutil/integration/helpers.goLength of output: 689
255-265: Ensure consistent handling of balances and rewards calculations.x/bundles/keeper/keeper_suite_inflation_splitting_test.go (3)
37-39: Add test cases for multiple coins with inflation splitting.These new test cases are crucial for ensuring that the system behaves correctly when handling multiple types of coins with different inflation splitting settings. Good addition for comprehensive testing.
197-197: Validate changes to community pool coin handling.The modifications to handle multiple types of coins in the community pool are well-implemented. This is crucial for systems that deal with various coin types and ensures that the logic for handling pool balances is robust.
Also applies to: 237-239
81-107: Ensure dynamic handling of multiple coin types in funders parameters.The handling of multiple coin types with different weights and minimum funding amounts is a complex feature. Verify that the logic correctly handles edge cases, such as extremely high or low values, and interacts correctly with other parts of the system.
Implemented final unit tests to test the multiple coin feature with all relevant modules together
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
stakers,bundles, andfundersmodules.Bug Fixes
Refactor
sdk.Coinsinstead ofuint64.Documentation
MsgClaimCommissionmessage.