Conversation
WalkthroughThe PR implements a comprehensive database migration from a basic candidate management system to a full Applicant Tracking System (ATS) by introducing 8 new database tables, expanding existing Candidate/Education/WorkExperience/Resume models with additional fields and cascade delete rules, establishing complex relational networks with foreign keys and indexes, and providing extensive migration documentation and automation tooling. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Admin as Admin/Recruiter
participant API
participant DB as Database
rect rgb(200, 230, 255)
Note over Admin,DB: 1. Setup Phase
Admin->>API: Create Company & Employees
API->>DB: Insert Company, Employee records
DB-->>API: ✓ Created
end
rect rgb(220, 240, 200)
Note over Admin,DB: 2. Position Publication
Admin->>API: Post Job Position + Interview Flow
API->>DB: Insert Position, InterviewFlow, InterviewSteps
DB-->>API: ✓ Position Live
end
rect rgb(255, 240, 200)
Note over Admin,DB: 3. Candidate Application
Admin->>API: Candidate applies for Position
API->>DB: Insert Application (links Candidate ↔ Position)
DB-->>API: ✓ Application Recorded
end
rect rgb(240, 220, 240)
Note over Admin,DB: 4. Interview Process
Admin->>API: Schedule Interview via InterviewStep
API->>DB: Insert Interview (links Application ↔ InterviewStep ↔ Employee)
DB-->>API: ✓ Interview Scheduled
API->>DB: Update Interview with result/score
DB-->>API: ✓ Updated
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~50 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/package.json (1)
25-25: Align Prisma versions across package.json files to resolve dependency conflict.Verification confirms the version mismatch: backend uses Prisma
^5.13.0while the rootpackage.jsonspecifies^6.19.0for both@prisma/clientandprisma. The incompatible major versions (5.x vs 6.x) cause npm to detect a conflict. Update either backend/package.json lines 25 and 44 or root package.json lines 3 and 12 to use consistent versions, ensuring alignment between the Prisma client and CLI.
🧹 Nitpick comments (10)
backend/package.json.example (1)
1-27: LGTM with documentation suggestion.This example package.json provides a clear template for the backend configuration. The scripts are well-organized and cover essential Prisma and database operations.
Consider adding a brief comment at the top of the file explaining its purpose:
{ + "_comment": "Example package.json - copy to package.json and adjust as needed", "name": "backend", "version": "2.0.0",backend/prisma/ATS_SYSTEM_OVERVIEW.md (1)
1-436: Excellent comprehensive documentation!This overview provides a thorough explanation of the ATS system architecture, workflows, and entities. The visual diagrams and code examples are particularly helpful.
For improved markdown compliance, consider adding language identifiers to the unlabeled code blocks (Lines 5, 57, 245, 252, 259, 315, 365) as flagged by markdownlint:
-``` +```text ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ATS SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE │This helps rendering engines apply proper syntax highlighting.
backend/prisma/DATABASE_SCHEMA.md (1)
1-404: Comprehensive and well-structured schema documentation!This document provides excellent technical detail on the ATS database schema, including:
- Complete ER diagram with relationships
- Index strategy and rationale
- Constraint documentation
- Practical SQL examples
- Data flow illustrations
The documentation will be invaluable for developers working with the database.
For improved markdown compliance, consider:
- Add a blank line before the table at Line 137 (flagged by MD058)
- Add a language identifier to the code block at Line 196:
-``` +```text - VarChar(15): phoneThese are minor formatting improvements that enhance rendering consistency.
backend/scripts/seed-ats.ts (1)
31-74: Verify upsert behavior with hardcoded IDs.The upsert operations use hardcoded IDs (1-5) for InterviewType records. On a fresh database, if the sequence starts at a different value or if these IDs are already taken by other records, this could cause inconsistencies. The empty update object
{}also means no fields are updated if records exist.Consider using
createManywithskipDuplicates: trueor removing the hardcodedidfield to let the database auto-generate IDs consistently:-const phoneScreening = await prisma.interviewType.upsert({ - where: { id: 1 }, - update: {}, - create: { +const phoneScreening = await prisma.interviewType.create({ + data: { name: 'Phone Screening', description: 'Initial phone call to assess basic qualifications and interest' } });Alternatively, if these are meant to be idempotent seed records, consider using unique constraints on the
namefield and upserting by name instead of ID.backend/prisma/migrations/manual_migration.sql (2)
24-26: Consider backfilling existing NULL uploadDate values.The default value for
uploadDateis set toCURRENT_TIMESTAMP, but this only affects new rows. If there are existingResumerecords with NULLuploadDatevalues, they will remain NULL.If you want to ensure all existing records have a valid upload date, add a backfill statement:
-- After setting the default UPDATE "Resume" SET "uploadDate" = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP WHERE "uploadDate" IS NULL;However, if the Resume table is new or guaranteed to be empty, this is not necessary.
163-164: Consider the cascade behavior for Employee deletion.The Interview table has
ON DELETE RESTRICTfor the Employee foreign key. This means you cannot delete an Employee record if they have conducted any interviews, even historical ones.Consider whether this is the intended behavior:
- RESTRICT: Protects data integrity but prevents employee removal (current)
- SET NULL: Allows employee deletion but loses interviewer information
- Soft delete: Add an
isActiveflag to Employee (already exists) and never actually DELETE recordsSince the Employee table already has an
isActiveboolean (line 64), using soft deletes might be the better approach. Keep the RESTRICT constraint but handle employee "deletion" by settingisActive = falseinstead of using SQL DELETE.backend/prisma/QUICK_START.md (1)
69-236: Inconsistency between example seed script and actual seed-ats.ts.This embedded example uses
.create()for InterviewTypes (lines 79-89) without hardcoded IDs, which is better practice. However, the actualbackend/scripts/seed-ats.tsfile uses.upsert()with hardcoded IDs (1-5).Consider either:
- Update the actual
seed-ats.tsto match this cleaner example (usecreateinstead ofupsertwith hardcoded IDs)- Remove this embedded example and simply reference the actual file
- Add a note explaining why they differ
This will avoid confusion for users who might copy this example thinking it's the complete solution, when there's actually a more comprehensive seed file available.
backend/prisma/MIGRATION_GUIDE.md (1)
1-275: Documentation is comprehensive but has minor Spanish grammar/formatting inconsistencies.The migration guide is well-structured and provides excellent detail on the ATS expansion. LanguageTool flags ~50 minor Spanish grammar and punctuation preferences (e.g., missing periods after list items, capitalization style) that are low-impact for documentation clarity. These can be addressed in a follow-up pass if desired.
prompts/prompts-iniciales.md (2)
11-98: Mermaid diagram uses snake_case but schema.prisma uses camelCase—ensure consistency for developer clarity.The ER diagram documents field names in snake_case (e.g.,
company_id,interview_flow_id), but the actual Prisma schema uses camelCase (e.g.,companyId,interviewFlowId). While the database will store snake_case column names, developers working with the Prisma ORM see camelCase in code. Update the Mermaid diagram field names to match schema.prisma for consistency:EMPLOYEE { int id PK int company_id FK - int company_id FK + int companyId FKThis prevents confusion when developers cross-reference the diagram with actual code.
11-11: Add language specifier to Mermaid code block for proper rendering.The fenced code block at line 11 is missing a language specifier. Update for proper syntax highlighting:
-```mermaid +```mermaid erDiagram
| DB_PASSWORD=D1ymf8wyQEGthFR1E9xhCq | ||
| DB_USER=LTIdbUser | ||
| DB_NAME=LTIdb | ||
| # Database Configuration for Docker Compose |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove BOM character.
The byte-order mark (BOM) character at the start of the comment causes static analysis warnings and can lead to parsing issues.
Apply this diff:
-# Database Configuration for Docker Compose
+# Database Configuration for Docker Compose📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Database Configuration for Docker Compose | |
| # Database Configuration for Docker Compose |
🧰 Tools
🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)
[warning] 1-1: [IncorrectDelimiter] The # Database Configuration for Docker Compose key has incorrect delimiter
(IncorrectDelimiter)
[warning] 1-1: [KeyWithoutValue] The # Database Configuration for Docker Compose key should be with a value or have an equal sign
(KeyWithoutValue)
[warning] 1-1: [LeadingCharacter] Invalid leading character detected
(LeadingCharacter)
[warning] 1-1: [LowercaseKey] The # Database Configuration for Docker Compose key should be in uppercase
(LowercaseKey)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .env around line 1 there is a leading BOM character (�) before the comment "#
Database Configuration for Docker Compose" that triggers static analysis and
parsing issues; remove the BOM by re-saving the file as UTF-8 without BOM or
deleting the invisible character so the file begins directly with the '#'
comment (ensure no other invisible bytes remain).
| # Database Configuration for Docker Compose | ||
| DB_USER=postgres | ||
| DB_PASSWORD=postgres123 | ||
| DB_NAME=ats_database | ||
| DB_PORT=5432 | ||
| DATABASE_URL="postgresql://${DB_USER}:${DB_PASSWORD}@localhost:${DB_PORT}/${DB_NAME}" | ||
|
|
||
| # Prisma Database URL | ||
| DATABASE_URL="postgresql://postgres:postgres123@localhost:5432/ats_database?schema=public" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Clarify configuration strategy and address duplication.
This file contains potential issues:
-
Duplication: Both root
.envandbackend/.envdefineDATABASE_URL. It's unclear which takes precedence or if both are needed. -
Redundancy: Lines 2-5 define individual DB variables (
DB_USER,DB_PASSWORD,DB_NAME,DB_PORT) while Line 8 provides a compositeDATABASE_URL. This redundancy can lead to inconsistencies if one is updated but not the other. -
Security: Hardcoded credentials are committed if this file is tracked.
Recommendations:
- Document which
.envfile is authoritative (root vs backend) - Choose either individual variables OR
DATABASE_URL, not both - Ensure
.envfiles are in.gitignoreand provide.env.exampletemplates
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for .env file conflicts and tracking status
echo "=== Searching for DATABASE_URL definitions ==="
rg -n "DATABASE_URL" --type env .env backend/.env 2>/dev/null || rg -n "DATABASE_URL" .env backend/.env
echo -e "\n=== Checking .gitignore coverage ==="
rg "\.env" .gitignore
echo -e "\n=== Checking if .env files are tracked ==="
git ls-files | rg "\.env$"Length of output: 382
Immediately remove .env files from git tracking and fix .gitignore configuration.
Verification confirms critical issues:
-
.envfiles are tracked in git: Both.envandbackend/.envare committed with hardcoded credentials (postgres/postgres123). This is a security risk—credentials should never be in version control. -
.gitignoreis misconfigured: The patterns#**/.envand# .envare commented out (prefixed with#), so they don't actually exclude.envfiles. Only**/.env.exampleis active. -
Duplication confirmed:
DATABASE_URLis defined identically in both files (lines 2-5 and line 8 in root.env).
Required actions:
- Remove
.envandbackend/.envfrom git history usinggit rm --cached - Fix
.gitignoreby uncommenting or correcting the patterns to:.envandbackend/.env - Provide
.env.exampleandbackend/.env.exampletemplates with placeholder values - Document which
.envfile takes precedence
🧰 Tools
🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)
[warning] 1-1: [IncorrectDelimiter] The # Database Configuration for Docker Compose key has incorrect delimiter
(IncorrectDelimiter)
[warning] 1-1: [KeyWithoutValue] The # Database Configuration for Docker Compose key should be with a value or have an equal sign
(KeyWithoutValue)
[warning] 1-1: [LeadingCharacter] Invalid leading character detected
(LeadingCharacter)
[warning] 1-1: [LowercaseKey] The # Database Configuration for Docker Compose key should be in uppercase
(LowercaseKey)
[warning] 2-2: [UnorderedKey] The DB_USER key should go before the # Database Configuration for Docker Compose key
(UnorderedKey)
[warning] 3-3: [UnorderedKey] The DB_PASSWORD key should go before the DB_USER key
(UnorderedKey)
[warning] 4-4: [UnorderedKey] The DB_NAME key should go before the DB_PASSWORD key
(UnorderedKey)
[warning] 5-5: [UnorderedKey] The DB_PORT key should go before the DB_USER key
(UnorderedKey)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .env (lines 1-8) and backend/.env remove sensitive credentials from version
control and update git tracking: run git rm --cached .env backend/.env and
commit the removals so the files remain locally but are untracked; fix
.gitignore by adding uncommented entries ".env" and "backend/.env" (or
"**/.env") to ensure both root and backend env files are ignored; add
.env.example and backend/.env.example files with placeholder values (e.g.,
DB_USER=your_user, DB_PASSWORD=your_password, DB_NAME=your_db, DB_PORT=5432,
DATABASE_URL="postgresql://...") and commit them; finally add a short note in
the repo README (or a new docs/ENV.md) stating which file takes precedence (root
.env vs backend/.env) and how to populate local .env from the corresponding
.env.example.
| # Database Configuration | ||
| DATABASE_URL="postgresql://postgres:postgres123@localhost:5432/ats_database?schema=public" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Remove BOM character and address security concerns.
The file contains several issues:
-
BOM Character: A byte-order mark (BOM) character
precedes the comment on Line 1, causing multiple static analysis warnings. This invisible character can cause parsing issues. -
Hardcoded Credentials: The DATABASE_URL contains hardcoded credentials (
postgres:postgres123). If this file is tracked in version control, it poses a security risk. -
File Purpose: The filename
backend/.envsuggests this is a template or example. Consider renaming tobackend/.env.exampleand ensure the actual.envfile is in.gitignore.
Apply this diff to remove the BOM and rename the file:
-# Database Configuration
+# Database Configuration
DATABASE_URL="postgresql://postgres:postgres123@localhost:5432/ats_database?schema=public"Then verify that:
backend/.envis in.gitignore- Developers use
backend/.env.exampleas a template - Actual credentials are set via environment variables or a local
.envfile
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if .env files are properly ignored
echo "=== Checking .gitignore for .env files ==="
rg -n "\.env" .gitignore
echo -e "\n=== Checking if .env files are tracked in git ==="
git ls-files | rg "\.env$"Length of output: 150
Remove BOM character and immediately address tracked credentials in version control.
The file contains critical issues:
-
BOM Character: Line 1 has a byte-order mark (BOM) character
preceding the comment, causing static analysis warnings and potential parsing issues. -
Hardcoded Credentials in Version Control: The
DATABASE_URLcontains hardcoded credentials (postgres:postgres123), and verification confirms both.envandbackend/.envare actively tracked in git. This is a security vulnerability. -
.gitignoreIneffective: The.envrule in.gitignoreis not preventing tracking (line 3 appears to be commented).
Required actions:
- Remove
.envandbackend/.envfrom git history:git rm --cached .env backend/.env - Fix
.gitignore: Ensure.envrule is active (uncomment line 3 if needed) - Remove BOM character from Line 1
- Regenerate credentials and update only local
.envfiles - Use
backend/.env.exampleas a template with placeholder credentials
-# Database Configuration
+# Database Configuration
DATABASE_URL="postgresql://postgres:postgres123@localhost:5432/ats_database?schema=public"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Database Configuration | |
| DATABASE_URL="postgresql://postgres:postgres123@localhost:5432/ats_database?schema=public" | |
| # Database Configuration | |
| DATABASE_URL="postgresql://postgres:postgres123@localhost:5432/ats_database?schema=public" |
🧰 Tools
🪛 dotenv-linter (4.0.0)
[warning] 1-1: [IncorrectDelimiter] The # Database Configuration key has incorrect delimiter
(IncorrectDelimiter)
[warning] 1-1: [KeyWithoutValue] The # Database Configuration key should be with a value or have an equal sign
(KeyWithoutValue)
[warning] 1-1: [LeadingCharacter] Invalid leading character detected
(LeadingCharacter)
[warning] 1-1: [LowercaseKey] The # Database Configuration key should be in uppercase
(LowercaseKey)
[warning] 2-2: [UnorderedKey] The DATABASE_URL key should go before the # Database Configuration key
(UnorderedKey)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In backend/.env around lines 1 to 2, remove the leading BOM character on line 1
and replace the tracked file with a non-sensitive template; specifically: delete
the BOM so the file starts clean, remove both .env and backend/.env from git
tracking with git rm --cached .env backend/.env, fix .gitignore to ensure a
plain un-commented .env entry so future .env files are ignored, create or update
backend/.env.example with placeholder values (no real credentials), and
regenerate database credentials locally and store them only in your untracked
local .env files.
| - salaryMin: decimal(10,2, opcional) | ||
| - salaryMax: decimal(10,2, opcional) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix malformed field documentation syntax.
Line 85 has mismatched parentheses that could confuse readers about the actual field type and optionality.
- salaryMax: decimal(10,2, opcional)
+ salaryMax: decimal(10,2), opcionalThis formatting issue appears in multiple field descriptions; search for similar patterns and correct them for consistency.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - salaryMin: decimal(10,2, opcional) | |
| - salaryMax: decimal(10,2, opcional) | |
| - salaryMin: decimal(10,2, opcional) | |
| - salaryMax: decimal(10,2), opcional |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In backend/prisma/MIGRATION_GUIDE.md around lines 85-86, the field docs use
malformed parentheses "decimal(10,2, opcional)" which misplaces the optionality
token inside the type; fix by moving "opcional" outside the type and using
consistent syntax like "salaryMin: decimal(10,2) — opcional" (or "salaryMin:
decimal(10,2) (opcional)") and apply the same correction to salaryMax and any
other fields showing the same pattern across the document for consistency.
| CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "Candidate_email_key" ON "Candidate"("email"); | ||
|
|
||
| -- CreateIndex | ||
| CREATE INDEX "Candidate_email_idx" ON "Candidate"("email"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Redundant index on Candidate.email.
Lines 148 and 151 create both a unique constraint and a separate index on the same column:
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "Candidate_email_key" ON "Candidate"("email");
CREATE INDEX "Candidate_email_idx" ON "Candidate"("email");In PostgreSQL, a UNIQUE constraint automatically creates a unique index. The second regular index on the same column is redundant and wastes storage space.
This appears to be a Prisma schema definition issue. Check your schema.prisma file - you likely have both:
email String @unique
@@index([email])Remove the redundant @@index([email]) since @unique already creates an index. The same issue likely exists for Employee.email (lines 166 and 172).
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In backend/prisma/migrations/20251116182548_ats_system_expansion/migration.sql
around lines 148–151 (and similarly for Employee.email around lines ~166–172),
the migration creates both a UNIQUE index and a separate non-unique index on the
same email columns which is redundant; update your Prisma schema.prisma to
remove the explicit @@index([email]) entries for Candidate.email and
Employee.email (leave the email String fields with @unique), then regenerate the
migration (prisma migrate dev/resolve and/or create a new clean migration) so
the redundant CREATE INDEX statements are removed from the migration SQL.
| model Position { | ||
| id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) | ||
| companyId Int | ||
| interviewFlowId Int | ||
| title String @db.VarChar(255) | ||
| description String? @db.Text | ||
| status String @default("draft") @db.VarChar(50) | ||
| isVisible Boolean @default(true) | ||
| location String? @db.VarChar(255) | ||
| jobDescription String? @db.Text | ||
| requirements String? @db.Text | ||
| responsibilities String? @db.Text | ||
| salaryMin Decimal? @db.Decimal(10, 2) | ||
| salaryMax Decimal? @db.Decimal(10, 2) | ||
| employmentType String? @db.VarChar(50) | ||
| benefits String? @db.Text | ||
| companyDescription String? @db.Text | ||
| applicationDeadline DateTime? | ||
| contactInfo String? @db.VarChar(255) | ||
| company Company @relation(fields: [companyId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade) | ||
| interviewFlow InterviewFlow @relation(fields: [interviewFlowId], references: [id]) | ||
| applications Application[] | ||
|
|
||
| @@index([companyId]) | ||
| @@index([interviewFlowId]) | ||
| @@index([status]) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Position.interviewFlow relation missing onDelete behavior—positions become orphaned if flow is deleted.
Line 123 defines the interviewFlow relation without specifying what happens if the InterviewFlow is deleted. If an InterviewFlow is removed, Position records will have dangling foreign keys, and queries requiring valid flows will fail.
Choose one approach:
Option A (Cascade deletion): Delete positions when flow is deleted
interviewFlow InterviewFlow @relation(fields: [interviewFlowId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade)Option B (Restrict deletion): Prevent flow deletion if positions reference it
interviewFlow InterviewFlow @relation(fields: [interviewFlowId], references: [id], onDelete: Restrict)Option C (Allow orphans): Set NULL on deletion (requires interviewFlowId Int? as optional)
interviewFlowId Int?
interviewFlow InterviewFlow @relation(fields: [interviewFlowId], references: [id], onDelete: SetNull)Choose based on business logic: do positions belong to flows, or can flows be reusable templates? Recommend Option B (Restrict) if flows are shared templates to prevent accidental deletion; Option A (Cascade) if flows are position-specific.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| model Position { | |
| id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) | |
| companyId Int | |
| interviewFlowId Int | |
| title String @db.VarChar(255) | |
| description String? @db.Text | |
| status String @default("draft") @db.VarChar(50) | |
| isVisible Boolean @default(true) | |
| location String? @db.VarChar(255) | |
| jobDescription String? @db.Text | |
| requirements String? @db.Text | |
| responsibilities String? @db.Text | |
| salaryMin Decimal? @db.Decimal(10, 2) | |
| salaryMax Decimal? @db.Decimal(10, 2) | |
| employmentType String? @db.VarChar(50) | |
| benefits String? @db.Text | |
| companyDescription String? @db.Text | |
| applicationDeadline DateTime? | |
| contactInfo String? @db.VarChar(255) | |
| company Company @relation(fields: [companyId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade) | |
| interviewFlow InterviewFlow @relation(fields: [interviewFlowId], references: [id]) | |
| applications Application[] | |
| @@index([companyId]) | |
| @@index([interviewFlowId]) | |
| @@index([status]) | |
| } | |
| model Position { | |
| id Int @id @default(autoincrement()) | |
| companyId Int | |
| interviewFlowId Int | |
| title String @db.VarChar(255) | |
| description String? @db.Text | |
| status String @default("draft") @db.VarChar(50) | |
| isVisible Boolean @default(true) | |
| location String? @db.VarChar(255) | |
| jobDescription String? @db.Text | |
| requirements String? @db.Text | |
| responsibilities String? @db.Text | |
| salaryMin Decimal? @db.Decimal(10, 2) | |
| salaryMax Decimal? @db.Decimal(10, 2) | |
| employmentType String? @db.VarChar(50) | |
| benefits String? @db.Text | |
| companyDescription String? @db.Text | |
| applicationDeadline DateTime? | |
| contactInfo String? @db.VarChar(255) | |
| company Company @relation(fields: [companyId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade) | |
| interviewFlow InterviewFlow @relation(fields: [interviewFlowId], references: [id], onDelete: Restrict) | |
| applications Application[] | |
| @@index([companyId]) | |
| @@index([interviewFlowId]) | |
| @@index([status]) | |
| } |
| @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "dependencies": { | |||
| "@prisma/client": "^6.19.0", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify Prisma version 6.19.0 compatibility.
The root package.json specifies Prisma ^6.19.0, but backend/package.json uses ^5.13.0. This version mismatch could cause compatibility issues.
Additionally, since Prisma 6.19.0 may be a recent release (beyond my knowledge cutoff), verification is needed to ensure:
- The version exists and is stable
- It's compatible with the project's dependencies
- Migration from 5.13.0 to 6.19.0 doesn't introduce breaking changes
Consider aligning the Prisma versions across root and backend package files, or document why different versions are needed.
Also applies to: 12-12
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest stable version of Prisma and are there breaking changes between Prisma 5.13.0 and 6.19.0?
💡 Result:
Short answer: as of Nov 16, 2025 the latest stable Prisma ORM release is 6.19.0. [1][2]
Are there breaking changes between 5.13.0 and 6.19.0?
- Yes. Upgrading from any v5.x to v6.x is a major-version upgrade and can include breaking changes; Prisma follows SemVer so breaking changes may appear in major releases. [3][4]
- Major upgrade areas to check (high‑level): schema/prisma config changes (prisma.config.ts), new generator/adapter/driver model (database drivers like @prisma/adapter-pg), updated minimum Node/TypeScript requirements, and other documented v5→v6 breaking items in the upgrade guides and release notes. You should read the v6 upgrade guide and changelogs for the full, version‑by‑version list. [3][4][5]
References
- Prisma blog — Announcing Prisma 6.19.0 (Nov 5, 2025).
- Prisma changelog (shows 6.x releases).
- Prisma docs — Upgrade to Prisma ORM 6 (breaking changes & upgrade guide).
- Prisma docs — Upgrade to Prisma ORM 5 (major v5 breaking changes context).
- Prisma docs — Releases & SemVer policy.
I'll verify the actual package.json files to confirm the version mismatch and determine the scope of the issue.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Prisma versions in root and backend package.json files
echo "=== Root package.json (Prisma version) ==="
cat package.json | grep -A1 "@prisma/client"
echo ""
echo "=== Backend package.json (Prisma version) ==="
if [ -f backend/package.json ]; then
cat backend/package.json | grep -A1 "@prisma/client"
else
echo "backend/package.json not found, checking for alternative paths..."
find . -name "package.json" -type f | head -20
fiLength of output: 209
Align Prisma versions across root and backend package.json files.
Version mismatch confirmed: root specifies ^6.19.0 while backend specifies ^5.13.0. Since both are in the same repository, they should use the same major version to avoid runtime conflicts.
Prisma 6.19.0 is the current stable release. Upgrading from v5 to v6 includes breaking changes per SemVer; review the Prisma upgrade guide before aligning. Choose either to:
- Upgrade backend to
^6.19.0(align to latest), or - Downgrade root to
^5.13.0(align to current backend)
Then document the reason if different versions must be maintained.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json around line 3, the root dependency "@prisma/client": "^6.19.0"
conflicts with backend's ^5.13.0; align Prisma major versions to avoid runtime
issues. Update the backend package.json to "^6.19.0" (recommended) or change the
root to "^5.13.0" if you intentionally must stay on v5, then run package manager
install to update lockfiles, run any required Prisma upgrade steps (follow the
Prisma v5→v6 upgrade guide), regenerate clients (prisma generate) and run the
test suite/migrations to validate; if you keep differing versions, add a comment
in the repo docs explaining why with risk notes.
💪 FortalezasModelado muy sólido y coherenteLas entidades clave del flujo de reclutamiento ( Excelente alineación entre SQL y PrismaLas FKs, tipos de datos, Buen foco en rendimiento básicoHas indexado sistemáticamente:
Esto es justo lo que un DBA quiere ver en una primera versión del modelo. 🛠 RecomendacionesEliminar índices redundantes en columnas únicasEn Añadir reglas de negocio en el nivel de base de datosEjemplos muy útiles: Esto protege la integridad aunque haya errores en la capa de aplicación. Refinar unicidades y posibles índices compuestos
Índices compuestos donde haya filtrados combinados, por ejemplo:
El trabajo está muy bien encaminado: se nota cuidado tanto en el diseño de datos como en la coherencia con Prisma. Con esos ajustes, este esquema quedaría perfectamente listo para producción en muchos contextos. |
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores