1. Documentacion inicial - Proyecto Final#85
1. Documentacion inicial - Proyecto Final#85rapidroute-finance-dev wants to merge 6 commits intoLIDR-academy:mainfrom
Conversation
Added a detailed summary of interactions and project status, including key deliverables, current state, and next steps.
incorporation of the detailed proposals for the development of the project.
Updated the README to reflect project details and structure.
|
Important Review skippedToo many files! 148 files out of 298 files are above the max files limit of 150. You can disable this status message by setting the 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive project documentation for RRFinances, a multi-tenant cooperative finance system. It adds architecture diagrams, data models, security frameworks, user stories, work tickets (427 total across 9 blocks), process workflows, and requirements documentation. No executable code or runtime functionality changes are included. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Attention areas:
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (17)
prompts/sudolang_miguel.sudo (1)
35-38: Inconsistent case handling in user input comparisons.The DSL has inconsistent handling of case-sensitivity when comparing user input:
- Lines 35, 107, 124: Uses
toLowerCase()for comparison- Lines 51, 170: Compares directly with
"Sí"without case normalizationThis could lead to unexpected behavior if users type "sí", "SI", or "si" instead of the exact expected string.
Consider normalizing all user input comparisons consistently:
- if (choice == "Sí") { + if (choice.toLowerCase() == "sí") {Apply similar changes to lines 51 and 170.
Also applies to: 51-57, 107-109, 124-127, 169-174
prompts/DIAGRAMA_PAQUETES_MODULOS.md (2)
472-472: Add language specifier to fenced code blocks.The directory tree code blocks at lines 472 and 720 are missing language specifiers, which can affect syntax highlighting in some Markdown renderers. Consider adding a language identifier.
-``` +```text backend/ ├── src/Apply the same fix at line 720 for the frontend directory tree.
Also applies to: 720-720
848-861: Placeholder sections need completion.Multiple feature module sections use
[estructura similar]placeholder text (apoderados, poderes, catalogos, reportes, configuracion). Consider either completing these sections with actual structure details or adding a TODO comment indicating they are intentionally templated for consistency.Would you like me to help generate the detailed structure for these placeholder sections based on the patterns established for
usuariosandclientes?prompts/prompts.md (1)
18-25: Fix list indentation for Markdown consistency.The nested list items use 3-space indentation instead of the standard 2-space. While this renders correctly in most viewers, standardizing to 2-space indentation improves consistency.
- Diagramas de arquitectura y diseño en prompts/: - - DIAGRAMA_ARQUITECTURA_C4.md (Contexto y Contenedores: SPA Angular, API NestJS, PostgreSQL, Redis, S3, externo). + - DIAGRAMA_ARQUITECTURA_C4.md (Contexto y Contenedores: SPA Angular, API NestJS, PostgreSQL, Redis, S3, externo).Apply the same 2-space indentation to lines 19-25.
prompts/DIAGRAMA_DESPLIEGUE.md (1)
276-286: Revisar puertos expuestos entre DMZ y App TierEn la sección Firewalls y Security Groups se permite tráfico DMZ → App en
80, 443, 3000. Para producción suele ser suficiente exponer solo 80/443 y mantener puertos tipo3000detrás del reverse proxy o en red interna. Sugiero:
- Limitar DMZ → App a 80/443 únicamente, o
- Documentar explícitamente por qué 3000 debe ser accesible desde DMZ.
prompts/work_tickets_bloque_06.md (1)
10-18: Alinear niveles de encabezado para reducir ruido de markdownlintLos tickets están definidos como
#### TICKET-…inmediatamente después de##de módulo (se salta###), lo que dispara MD001. Si quieren mantener el linter verde, podrían:
- Subir los tickets a
### TICKET-xxx…, o- Bajar los módulos a
###y dejar los tickets en####.Funcionalmente no cambia nada, solo mejora consistencia de formato.
readme.md (1)
1-47: Buen índice maestro; considerar aclarar alcance vs implementación realEl README estructura bien la navegación hacia PRD, resúmenes, diagramas y tickets. Dado que aquí se declara bastante cobertura (76 casos de uso, 427 tickets, etc.), podría ser útil añadir una breve nota indicando si el repositorio de código ya implementa todo o si la documentación define el alcance objetivo, para evitar falsas expectativas en lectores nuevos.
prompts/work_tickets_bloque_05.md (1)
1201-1215: Aclarar si el estado “Sistema PRODUCTIVO” es real o objetivoEn esta sección se afirma que el sistema “ya cuenta con toda la funcionalidad core operativa” y está listo para lanzamiento MVP. Dado que este repositorio contiene sobre todo planificación y documentación, sugeriría aclarar explícitamente si:
- Refleja el estado real de la implementación, o
- Es el estado objetivo una vez ejecutados todos los tickets.
Eso ayudará a futuros lectores a no asumir capacidades que todavía no estén desplegadas.
prompts/PROJECT_SUMMARY.md (1)
9-21: Pequeños ajustes para dejar el markdownlint en verdeSi quieren que este archivo pase limpio por markdownlint:
Los enlaces del índice usan fragmentos como
#resumen-ejecutivo, pero los encabezados reales incluyen emoji y acentos (## 📊 Resumen Ejecutivo). Pueden:
- Simplificar los encabezados (sin emoji/acentos) para que el slug sea predecible, o
- Añadir anclas HTML explícitas (
<a id="resumen-ejecutivo"></a>justo antes del encabezado).Los bloques de diagrama/texto usan
sin lenguaje (tablas ASCII y cajas). Añadir algo como `text` en:
- El bloque de “Desglose de Esfuerzo”
- El diagrama de arquitectura
- El diagrama de monitoring/logs
Con eso deberían desaparecer los avisos MD051 y MD040 sin cambiar el contenido.
Also applies to: 87-99, 441-517
prompts/DIAGRAMA_COMPONENTES_BACKEND.md (1)
112-150: Use proper markdown headings instead of bold emphasis.Lines 112, 139, 145, 150, etc. use
**text**(bold) where proper markdown headings (###, ####) should be used. This improves document structure and navigation. For example:- ### 1. AuthModule (Autenticación y Autorización) - - ```typescript + ### 1. AuthModule (Autenticación y Autorización) + + ```typescript // auth/auth.module.ts - **Controllers:** + #### ControllersRefactor similar instances throughout the file (approx. 8–10 occurrences at lines 139, 145, 150, 167, 197, 207, 229, 238, 256, 285).
prompts/user_stories_rrfinances.md (1)
273-278: Technical considerations should cross-reference data model and backend architecture.The technical notes for US-003 (lines 273–278) mention "algoritmo de validación de cédula ecuatoriana", "almacenamiento de archivos", "proceso batch para vencimiento", and "sistema de alertas". Consider explicitly referencing how these will be implemented in backend modules (e.g., which service handles cédula validation, where PDFs are stored per the Storage module). This strengthens traceability to the architecture diagrams and backend components.
Add a subsection or hyperlink to
DIAGRAMA_COMPONENTES_BACKEND.md(section on PoderesModule, DocumentosService) andENTIDADES_MODELO_DATOS.md(Personas, Poderes entities) within the technical considerations to establish clear implementation paths.prompts/prd_rrfinances.md (2)
741-777: Add a language to the architecture code block for markdownlint and readabilityThe ASCII architecture diagram is fenced with ``` but without a language, which triggers MD040 and can degrade rendering in some viewers/tools. Consider tagging it explicitly, e.g.:
-``` +```text ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ FRONTEND (Angular + Fuse) │ ... -``` +```This keeps it purely illustrative while satisfying linters.
1374-1414: Fix duplicated section “17” and inconsistent 16.x subsection numberingThere are two main sections numbered “17”:
## 17. SUGERENCIAS Y RECOMENDACIONES(earlier).## 17. DEFINICIONES Y GLOSARIO(later).Additionally, within the “Sugerencias y recomendaciones” block you have subsections labeled
### 16.6 UX/UI,### 16.7 Testing,### 16.8 Performance,### 16.9 Documentación, which reuse the “16.x” prefix even though they logically belong under section 17.To avoid confusion in references and keep the outline coherent, I’d suggest:
- Renumber
### 16.6 UX/UI→### 17.6 UX/UI, and similarly adjust16.7–16.9to17.7–17.9.- Rename the final
## 17. DEFINICIONES Y GLOSARIOto## 18. DEFINICIONES Y GLOSARIO(or another next sequential number).This will keep TOC, cross-references, and future maintenance much clearer.
prompts/work_tickets_bloque_07.md (1)
10-40: Normalize ticket heading levels to avoid heading jumps (MD001)Right now each ticket uses
#### **TICKET-3xx...**directly under a##module heading, which markdownlint (MD001) flags as “heading levels should only increment by one level at a time.”To keep the outline and generated TOC clean (and silence the linter), consider either:
- Changing ticket headings to
###:-#### **TICKET-301: Implementar dashboard ejecutivo** +### TICKET-301: Implementar dashboard ejecutivoand similarly for the rest of the tickets in this file; or
- Introducing an intermediate
### Ticketssection and keeping tickets as####.Either option will give you a more consistent hierarchy across all bloques.
prompts/work_tickets_bloque_09.md (1)
10-40: Align ticket heading levels with the document hierarchyAs in Bloque 7, ticket titles here are
####under##module headings (skipping###), which causes MD001 warnings and can make the structure harder to scan.For consistency and cleaner tooling support, I’d suggest:
- Using
### TICKET-401: ...(and similarly for 402–427), or- Adding an intermediate
### Ticketsunder each module and keeping tickets as####.Applying the same convention across all
work_tickets_bloque_XX.mdfiles will make navigation and automation (e.g., TOC, exports) much smoother.prompts/DIAGRAMA_SECUENCIA.md (1)
55-57: Declare all services used in the Mermaid diagrams as participantsIn a couple of diagrams you send messages to services that aren’t declared as
participants:
- Autenticación/Login (section 1):
AuditServiceis used here:AuthController->>AuditService: log('AUTH', 'LOGIN', userId, ip) AuditService->>DB: INSERT INTO audit_logs
- Exportación Asíncrona (section 5):
NotificationServiceis used here:Mermaid will implicitly create lifelines, but for clarity and to keep the style consistent with other actors, it’s better to declare them explicitly near the top of each diagram, e.g.:
sequenceDiagram - participant StorageService as Storage Service (S3) + participant StorageService as Storage Service (S3) + participant NotificationService as Notification Serviceand similarly:
sequenceDiagram - participant Redis + participant Redis + participant AuditService as Audit ServiceThis will make the diagrams easier to read and less surprising to anyone editing them later.
Also applies to: 304-378
prompts/DIAGRAMA_COMPONENTES_FRONTEND.md (1)
1-1107: Frontend architecture is well-documented and follows Angular modular best practices, but lacks guidance on error handling patterns, testing, and cross-module state management.The component diagram effectively illustrates the layered modular architecture (Core, Shared, Layout, Features) with appropriate use of lazy loading, guards, interceptors, and facade-based state management. However, several architectural patterns need clarification:
Error Handling Pattern: The ErrorInterceptor is mentioned (Line 17, 106) but no implementation details are shown. The diagram should clarify how errors are categorized (auth errors, client errors, server errors, network errors) and how each is handled (retry logic, user notification, logging).
Cross-Module State and Side Effects: The Facade pattern (ClientesFacade example, lines 556–602) uses BehaviorSubject for simple state. For complex interactions between feature modules (e.g., filter changes in Clientes affecting Poderes selection), the documentation should clarify whether a centralized state management (NgRx/Store) will be introduced later or if services will communicate via shared observables.
Testing Strategy: No testing patterns, mock services, or test utilities are documented. Given the modular architecture, clarify whether unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests are expected per module type (e.g., Core module services have unit tests, feature components have integration tests, critical flows have E2E tests).
Unsubscription and Memory Leaks: Best practice (Line 1094) mentions using
asyncpipe, but the example (ClientesListComponent, lines 442–444) shows raw subscriptions in methods likeloadClientes(line 474–479). Ensure all subscriptions are explicitly unsubscribed or useasyncpipe consistently to avoid memory leaks.Proposed additions to documentation:
- Add error handling pattern section with examples (auth errors, HTTP error codes, network timeouts).
- Document cross-module state management strategy (current: Facade with BehaviorSubject; future: NgRx if needed).
- Include testing patterns and mock service examples.
- Clarify subscription management (prefer
asyncpipe, document unsubscribe pattern for manual subscriptions).
prompts/DATA_MODEL_DIAGRAM.md
Outdated
| COOPERATIVAS ||--o{ CONFIGURACIONES : tiene | ||
| COOPERATIVAS ||--o{ OFICINAS : tiene | ||
| COOPERATIVAS ||--o{ USUARIOS : agrupa | ||
| COOPERATIVAS ||--o{ ROLES : define | ||
| COOPERATIVAS ||--o{ PERMISOS : define | ||
| COOPERATIVAS ||--o{ CATALOGOS : define |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistencia multi‑tenant en CATALOGOS y PERMISOS respecto a COOPERATIVAS
Arriba se modela:
COOPERATIVAS ||--o{ CATALOGOS : defineCOOPERATIVAS ||--o{ PERMISOS : define
pero las entidades CATALOGOS y PERMISOS no incluyen cooperativa_id_fk, a diferencia de otras entidades dependientes de cooperativa (ej. ROLES, USUARIOS_ROLES, CLIENTES).
Conviene decidir si:
-
Son globales (compartidos por todas las cooperativas):
- Quitar esas relaciones desde
COOPERATIVASy aclarar en las notas que son catálogos/permisos globales; o
- Quitar esas relaciones desde
-
Son por cooperativa (lo que sugiere el diagrama actual):
- Añadir
int cooperativa_id_fkaCATALOGOSyPERMISOSy, idealmente, mencionarlo también en las notas sobre multi‑tenant.
- Añadir
Ejemplo de ajuste mínimo en el diagrama:
CATALOGOS {
int id_pk
+ int cooperativa_id_fk
string codigo
string nombre
string descripcion
string tipo
string estado
datetime fecha_creacion
int usuario_creacion
}
PERMISOS {
int id_pk
+ int cooperativa_id_fk
string codigo
string descripcion
string estado
json metadata_opt
datetime fecha_creacion
}Also applies to: 182-189, 226-235
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
prompts/DATA_MODEL_DIAGRAM.md around lines 7 to 12 (also applies to lines
182-189 and 226-235): the diagram currently shows COOPERATIVAS -> CATALOGOS and
COOPERATIVAS -> PERMISOS but the CATALOGOS and PERMISOS entity definitions lack
a cooperativa_id_fk, creating a multi-tenant inconsistency; choose one approach
and implement it: either remove those associations from COOPERATIVAS and add a
note that CATALOGOS and PERMISOS are global/shared, or keep the associations and
add int cooperativa_id_fk to both CATALOGOS and PERMISOS (and update the
multi-tenant notes accordingly) so the diagram and entity attributes align.
prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md
Outdated
| # Diagrama de Seguridad - RRFinances | ||
|
|
||
| ## 1. Arquitectura de Seguridad en Capas | ||
|
|
||
| ```mermaid | ||
| graph TB | ||
| subgraph Layer1["Capa 1: Perímetro"] | ||
| WAF["WAF / Firewall<br/>- DDoS Protection<br/>- SQL Injection<br/>- XSS Prevention<br/>- Rate Limiting"] | ||
| CDN["CDN<br/>- SSL/TLS<br/>- HTTPS Only<br/>- HSTS"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| subgraph Layer2["Capa 2: Aplicación Frontend"] | ||
| AuthGuard["Auth Guards<br/>- Route Protection<br/>- Role Validation"] | ||
| CSP["Content Security Policy<br/>- Script Sources<br/>- Frame Ancestors"] | ||
| Sanitization["Input Sanitization<br/>- XSS Prevention<br/>- HTML Escape"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| subgraph Layer3["Capa 3: API Backend"] | ||
| JWTAuth["JWT Authentication<br/>- Token Validation<br/>- Signature Verify"] | ||
| RBAC["RBAC Authorization<br/>- Roles Check<br/>- Permissions Check"] | ||
| TenantIsolation["Tenant Isolation<br/>- cooperativa_id Filter<br/>- Auto-inject Context"] | ||
| RateLimit["Rate Limiting<br/>- Throttling<br/>- IP Whitelist"] | ||
| InputValidation["Input Validation<br/>- DTOs<br/>- class-validator<br/>- Sanitization"] | ||
| CORS["CORS<br/>- Allowed Origins<br/>- Credentials"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| subgraph Layer4["Capa 4: Base de Datos"] | ||
| RowLevel["Row-Level Security<br/>- PostgreSQL Policies<br/>- cooperativa_id"] | ||
| Encryption["Encryption at Rest<br/>- Sensitive Data<br/>- Passwords: bcrypt"] | ||
| Parameterized["Parameterized Queries<br/>- SQL Injection Prevention<br/>- TypeORM Safe"] | ||
| Audit["Audit Trail<br/>- All Operations<br/>- User Tracking"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| subgraph Layer5["Capa 5: Infraestructura"] | ||
| NetworkSeg["Network Segmentation<br/>- Private Subnets<br/>- Security Groups"] | ||
| Encryption2["Encryption in Transit<br/>- TLS 1.3<br/>- mTLS (Internal)"] | ||
| Secrets["Secrets Management<br/>- Vault / AWS Secrets<br/>- No Hardcoded Keys"] | ||
| Backup["Encrypted Backups<br/>- AES-256<br/>- Off-site Storage"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| User["👤 Usuario"] -->|HTTPS| WAF | ||
| WAF --> CDN | ||
| CDN --> Layer2 | ||
| Layer2 --> Layer3 | ||
| Layer3 --> Layer4 | ||
| Layer4 --> Layer5 | ||
|
|
||
| classDef perimeterStyle fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828,stroke-width:2px | ||
| classDef frontendStyle fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0,stroke-width:2px | ||
| classDef apiStyle fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#e65100,stroke-width:2px | ||
| classDef dbStyle fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px | ||
| classDef infraStyle fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#6a1b9a,stroke-width:2px | ||
|
|
||
| class WAF,CDN perimeterStyle | ||
| class AuthGuard,CSP,Sanitization frontendStyle | ||
| class JWTAuth,RBAC,TenantIsolation,RateLimit,InputValidation,CORS apiStyle | ||
| class RowLevel,Encryption,Parameterized,Audit dbStyle | ||
| class NetworkSeg,Encryption2,Secrets,Backup infraStyle | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## 2. Flujo de Autenticación y Autorización | ||
|
|
||
| ```mermaid | ||
| graph TB | ||
| Start([Usuario accede a la app]) | ||
| Start --> CheckToken{¿Tiene token<br/>válido?} | ||
|
|
||
| CheckToken -->|No| ShowLogin[Mostrar Login] | ||
| ShowLogin --> EnterCreds[Usuario ingresa credenciales] | ||
| EnterCreds --> ValidateCreds{Validar<br/>credenciales} | ||
|
|
||
| ValidateCreds -->|Inválidas| IncrementAttempts[Incrementar intentos fallidos] | ||
| IncrementAttempts --> CheckAttempts{Intentos >= 5?} | ||
| CheckAttempts -->|Sí| BlockUser[Bloquear usuario] | ||
| BlockUser --> ShowError1[Mostrar: Usuario bloqueado] | ||
| CheckAttempts -->|No| ShowError2[Mostrar: Credenciales incorrectas] | ||
| ShowError2 --> ShowLogin | ||
|
|
||
| ValidateCreds -->|Válidas| CheckStatus{Estado usuario<br/>activo?} | ||
| CheckStatus -->|No| ShowError3[Mostrar: Usuario inactivo] | ||
|
|
||
| CheckStatus -->|Sí| GenerateJWT[Generar JWT con payload:<br/>userId, cooperativaId,<br/>roles, permissions] | ||
| GenerateJWT --> StoreSession[Guardar sesión en Redis<br/>y PostgreSQL] | ||
| StoreSession --> ReturnToken[Retornar token + refreshToken] | ||
| ReturnToken --> StoreInBrowser[Almacenar en LocalStorage] | ||
| StoreInBrowser --> SetAuthHeader[Configurar header:<br/>Authorization: Bearer token] | ||
|
|
||
| CheckToken -->|Sí| ValidateToken{Token válido<br/>y no expirado?} | ||
| ValidateToken -->|No| TryRefresh{¿Tiene<br/>refreshToken?} | ||
| TryRefresh -->|No| ShowLogin | ||
| TryRefresh -->|Sí| RefreshToken[Solicitar nuevo token] | ||
| RefreshToken --> ValidateRefresh{RefreshToken<br/>válido?} | ||
| ValidateRefresh -->|No| ShowLogin | ||
| ValidateRefresh -->|Sí| GenerateJWT | ||
|
|
||
| ValidateToken -->|Sí| ExtractPayload[Extraer payload del token] | ||
| ExtractPayload --> CheckRoute{Ruta requiere<br/>roles/permisos?} | ||
|
|
||
| CheckRoute -->|No| AllowAccess[Permitir acceso] | ||
|
|
||
| CheckRoute -->|Sí| CheckRole{Usuario tiene<br/>rol requerido?} | ||
| CheckRole -->|No| ShowUnauth[Mostrar: No autorizado] | ||
| CheckRole -->|Sí| CheckPermission{Usuario tiene<br/>permiso requerido?} | ||
| CheckPermission -->|No| ShowUnauth | ||
| CheckPermission -->|Sí| InjectTenant[Inyectar cooperativaId<br/>en contexto request] | ||
| InjectTenant --> AllowAccess | ||
|
|
||
| AllowAccess --> ExecuteRequest[Ejecutar operación] | ||
| ExecuteRequest --> FilterByTenant[Aplicar filtro:<br/>WHERE cooperativa_id = X] | ||
| FilterByTenant --> LogAudit[Registrar en audit_logs] | ||
| LogAudit --> ReturnResponse[Retornar respuesta] | ||
|
|
||
| style Start fill:#e8f5e9 | ||
| style AllowAccess fill:#c8e6c9 | ||
| style ShowError1 fill:#ffcdd2 | ||
| style ShowError2 fill:#ffcdd2 | ||
| style ShowError3 fill:#ffcdd2 | ||
| style ShowUnauth fill:#ffcdd2 | ||
| style BlockUser fill:#ef5350 | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## 3. Arquitectura Multi-tenant (Row-Level Security) | ||
|
|
||
| ```mermaid | ||
| graph TB | ||
| subgraph Request["Request Entrante"] | ||
| HTTPReq["HTTP Request"] | ||
| JWTToken["JWT Token en Header"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| subgraph AuthProcess["Proceso de Autenticación"] | ||
| DecodeJWT["Decodificar JWT"] | ||
| ExtractCoopId["Extraer cooperativaId<br/>del payload"] | ||
| ValidateCoop["Validar cooperativaId<br/>existe y está activa"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| subgraph TenantContext["Contexto Multi-tenant"] | ||
| InjectContext["Inyectar cooperativaId<br/>en Request Context"] | ||
| TenantInterceptor["Tenant Interceptor<br/>actúa globalmente"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| subgraph QueryExecution["Ejecución de Query"] | ||
| BaseQuery["Query Base:<br/>SELECT * FROM clientes"] | ||
| AutoFilter["Aplicar filtro automático:<br/>WHERE cooperativa_id = ?"] | ||
| SoftDeleteFilter["Aplicar filtro soft delete:<br/>AND fecha_eliminacion IS NULL"] | ||
| ExecuteQuery["Ejecutar en PostgreSQL"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| subgraph Database["Base de Datos"] | ||
| PGPolicy["PostgreSQL RLS Policies<br/>(capa adicional)"] | ||
| IndexOptim["Índices compuestos:<br/>(cooperativa_id, id)<br/>(cooperativa_id, campo)"] | ||
| ResultSet["Resultados filtrados<br/>solo de cooperativa actual"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| subgraph Validation["Validación de Resultados"] | ||
| CheckResults{¿Resultados<br/>vacíos?} | ||
| Return404["404 Not Found"] | ||
| ReturnData["200 OK + Data"] | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| HTTPReq --> JWTToken | ||
| JWTToken --> DecodeJWT | ||
| DecodeJWT --> ExtractCoopId | ||
| ExtractCoopId --> ValidateCoop | ||
|
|
||
| ValidateCoop -->|Inválida| Return403["403 Forbidden"] | ||
| ValidateCoop -->|Válida| InjectContext | ||
|
|
||
| InjectContext --> TenantInterceptor | ||
| TenantInterceptor --> BaseQuery | ||
| BaseQuery --> AutoFilter | ||
| AutoFilter --> SoftDeleteFilter | ||
| SoftDeleteFilter --> ExecuteQuery | ||
|
|
||
| ExecuteQuery --> PGPolicy | ||
| PGPolicy --> IndexOptim | ||
| IndexOptim --> ResultSet | ||
| ResultSet --> CheckResults | ||
|
|
||
| CheckResults -->|Vacíos| Return404 | ||
| CheckResults -->|Con datos| ReturnData | ||
|
|
||
| Note1["🔒 Aislamiento Garantizado:<br/>- JWT contiene cooperativaId inmutable<br/>- Filtro automático en TODAS las queries<br/>- Imposible acceder datos de otra cooperativa<br/>- No confía en input del cliente"] | ||
|
|
||
| style Note1 fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00 | ||
| style Return403 fill:#ffcdd2 | ||
| style Return404 fill:#ffcdd2 | ||
| style ReturnData fill:#c8e6c9 | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find key files mentioned in the review
fd -t f \( -name "environment*" -o -name "*.prod.*" \) | head -20Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 307
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# List directory structure to understand project layout
git ls-files | grep -E "(src/|config/|env)" | head -30Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 59
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check current directory and list main structure
pwd
ls -laRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 521
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find TypeScript/JavaScript source files
find . -type f -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" | grep -E "(env|auth|rate|encrypt)" | head -30Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 59
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Explore prompts directory and list all files
ls -la prompts/Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 2011
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any implementation files in the repository
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.json" \) | head -30Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 59
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Read the DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md file to verify line references and content
wc -l prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 110
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for rate limiting references (Ticket 353)
grep -n "353\|rate.limit\|100 req/min" prompts/*.md | head -20Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 1819
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Read sections of DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md to verify line number references
echo "=== Lines 1-50 (header) ==="
sed -n '1,50p' prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md | cat -n
echo -e "\n=== Lines 260-280 (session/token area) ==="
sed -n '260,280p' prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md | cat -nRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 5337
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for session timeout, MFA, encryption mentions
grep -n "8h\|8 hour\|sesión\|timeout\|MFA\|future\|encript" prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md | head -30Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 397
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for environment configuration, session timeout references
grep -n "environment\|prod\.ts\|1076\|session\|timeout" prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 234
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for Ticket 353 references and rate limiting details
grep -n "Ticket 353\|TICKET-353" prompts/work_tickets*.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 177
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check work_tickets for rate limiting details (Ticket-206, Ticket-025 found earlier)
grep -A 30 "TICKET-206\|TICKET-025" prompts/work_tickets_bloque_05.md prompts/work_tickets_bloque_01.md | head -80Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 4043
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check TICKET-353 specifically (line 63 in work_tickets_bloque_08.md)
sed -n '63,100p' prompts/work_tickets_bloque_08.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 1425
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for MFA references and "future" mentions
grep -n -i "mfa\|multi.factor\|future\|futuro" prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 270
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for secrets rotation, encryption at rest details
grep -n "rotaci\|secret\|encrypt.*rest\|pgcrypto\|field.*encrypt" prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 441
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for more details on encryption in DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md
grep -n -B2 -A2 "bcrypt\|Encryption\|AES-256\|pgcrypto\|sensitive" prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md | head -60Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 2559
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for session management and timeout details in DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md
grep -n "sesión\|session\|expir\|refresh\|token\|JWT" prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md | head -40Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 3262
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for deployment checklist and operational procedures
sed -n '460,510p' prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 2025
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify line count and check if there are other environment references
wc -l prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md
echo "---"
grep -n "environment\|prod\|1076" prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 517
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for session timeout specifics (idle vs absolute)
grep -n -i "idle\|inactiv\|absolute\|timeout" prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 141
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check prd_rrfinances.md and other files for environment references mentioned in review
grep -n "1076\|environment.prod\|session.*timeout\|idle.*timeout" prompts/*.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 379
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check environment.prod.ts reference - look in frontend diagram
sed -n '1000,1100p' prompts/DIAGRAMA_COMPONENTES_FRONTEND.md | head -80Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 2049
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Count lines in DIAGRAMA_COMPONENTES_FRONTEND.md to see if environment.prod.ts is documented there
wc -l prompts/DIAGRAMA_COMPONENTES_FRONTEND.md
sed -n '1068p' prompts/DIAGRAMA_COMPONENTES_FRONTEND.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 145
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify: does DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md reference environment.prod.ts at line 1076?
# The review says "Line 1076 shows 8-hour session timeout in environment.prod.ts"
# but DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md is only 547 lines. Let me check if this is correct.
grep -n "environment\|480\|8.*hour\|8h" prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 329
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify what's actually in DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md around token/session lifetime mentions
sed -n '195,215p' prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 1016
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Get full context of token/session storage section
sed -n '190,260p' prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 2928
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify line numbers - check what's at line 1076 mentioned in review
# First confirm DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md line count
echo "DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md lines:"
wc -l prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md
echo -e "\nDIAGRAMA_COMPONENTES_FRONTEND.md lines:"
wc -l prompts/DIAGRAMA_COMPONENTES_FRONTEND.md
# Check if environment.prod.ts is actually documented elsewhere
echo -e "\nSearching for environment.prod.ts content (session timeout):"
grep -B5 -A5 "sessionTimeout" prompts/DIAGRAMA_COMPONENTES_FRONTEND.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 585
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify Ticket 353 line range cited in review
sed -n '63,120p' prompts/work_tickets_bloque_08.md | grep -n "TICKET-353\|Rate limiting\|Prioridad\|Esfuerzo"Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 375
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Final verification: Check backend architecture for additional details on the 5 concerns
grep -n "rate.limit\|encript\|rotation\|secrets\|MFA\|timeout" prompts/DIAGRAMA_COMPONENTES_BACKEND.md | head -30Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 59
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PRD for session timeout and MFA details
grep -n "session.*timeout\|idle\|inactiv\|MFA\|multi.*factor" prompts/prd_rrfinances.md | head -20Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 546
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Final check: Look for any additional documentation on JWT key rotation or secrets management
grep -n "key.*rotation\|secret.*rotat\|versioning\|signing.*key" prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md prompts/prd_rrfinances.mdRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 59
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify where session timeout idle/auto-logout is actually mentioned
grep -n -B3 -A3 "cerrar sesión\|close session\|auto.*logout\|inactiv" prompts/prd_rrfinances.md | head -30Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject
Length of output: 1059
Security architecture is comprehensive and well-layered; however, several implementation details must be documented and verified before deployment.
The 5-layer security model (Perimeter → Frontend → API → Database → Infrastructure) is architecturally sound and covers OWASP Top 10 threats effectively. The auth/authz flow and multi-tenant isolation strategy are particularly well-designed. However, the following implementation decisions require clarification and documentation:
-
Session Timeout Strategy (Idle vs. Absolute): The frontend configuration specifies an 8-hour session timeout (480 minutes), but no distinction exists between idle timeout (inactivity) and absolute timeout (max session duration). The PRD requires auto-logout on inactivity. Financial institutions typically enforce shorter idle timeouts (15–30 minutes). Document both timeout policies and ensure both are enforced.
-
Rate Limiting Architecture: TICKET-353 specifies "100 req/min general, 200 req/min per user, 5 req/min login, Redis backend," but the hierarchy is unclear—is per-user a subset of per-IP? How are distributed requests across multiple IPs handled? Document the rate limiting granularity and ensure the Redis backend is configured with appropriate TTLs and eviction policies.
-
Secrets Rotation without Downtime: The operational checklist requires "quarterly secrets rotation," but no mechanism for rotating secrets (JWT signing keys, database passwords, API credentials) without service downtime is documented. Clarify key versioning strategy (e.g., multiple active signing keys during rotation window) or document Vault/AWS Secrets Manager features for gradual rollout.
-
Data Encryption at Rest: Only password hashing (bcrypt) is specified. Clarify which sensitive fields/tables require encryption, whether encryption is database-native (PostgreSQL pgcrypto) or application-level, key management approach, and performance impact.
-
MFA and Step-Up Authentication: Listed as "future" work, but given the financial domain and multi-cooperative access patterns, prioritize MFA. Document the roadmap for TOTP, SMS, or hardware key support, especially for admin/privileged users.
Recommended verification steps:
- Define session timeout policy (idle: 15 min, absolute: 8 hours suggested) and update configuration.
- Document rate limiting architecture diagram (per-IP vs. per-user vs. per-endpoint hierarchy) and Redis configuration (key patterns, TTLs, eviction policy).
- Design secrets rotation procedure (key versioning for JWT signing, password rotation, API credential rotation) and validate with Vault/AWS Secrets Manager.
- Specify data-at-rest encryption strategy (field-level or table-level, key management, performance impact) and decide on database-native vs. application-level approach.
- Prioritize MFA rollout timeline and implementation strategy (TOTP first, SMS fallback, hardware keys for privileged users).
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~3-~3: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ...d - RRFinances
1. Arquitectura de Seguridad en Capas
graph TB
s...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
---
[grammar] ~3-~3: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ...s
## 1. Arquitectura de Seguridad en Capas
```mermaid
graph TB
subgraph Layer1["Capa 1: Perímetro"]
WAF["WAF / Firewall<br/>- DDoS Protection<br/>- SQL Injection<br/>- XSS Prevention<br/>- Rate Limiting"]
CDN["CDN<br/>- SSL/TLS<br/>- HTTPS Only<br/>- HSTS"]
end
subgraph Layer2["Capa 2: Aplicación Frontend"]
AuthGuard["Auth Guards<br/>- Route Protection<br/>- Role Validation"]
CSP["Content Security Policy<br/>- Script Sources<br/>- Frame Ancestors"]
Sanitization["Input Sanitization<br/>- XSS Prevention<br/>- HTML Escape"]
end
subgraph Layer3["Capa 3: API Backend"]
JWTAuth["JWT Authentication<br/>- Token Validation<br/>- Signature Verify"]
RBAC["RBAC Authorization<br/>- Roles Check<br/>- Permissions Check"]
TenantIsolation["Tenant Isolation<br/>- cooperativa_id Filter<br/>- Auto-inject Context"]
RateLimit["Rate Limiting<br/>- Throttling<br/>- IP Whitelist"]
InputValidation["Input Validation<br/>- DTOs<br/>- class-validator<br/>- Sanitization"]
CORS["CORS<br/>- Allowed Origins<br/>- Credentials"]
end
subgraph Layer4["Capa 4: Base de Datos"]
RowLevel["Row-Level Security<br/>- PostgreSQL Policies<br/>- cooperativa_id"]
Encryption["Encryption at Rest<br/>- Sensitive Data<br/>- Passwords: bcrypt"]
Parameterized["Parameterized Queries<br/>- SQL Injection Prevention<br/>- TypeORM Safe"]
Audit["Audit Trail<br/>- All Operations<br/>- User Tracking"]
end
subgraph Layer5["Capa 5: Infraestructura"]
NetworkSeg["Network Segmentation<br/>- Private Subnets<br/>- Security Groups"]
Encryption2["Encryption in Transit<br/>- TLS 1.3<br/>- mTLS (Internal)"]
Secrets["Secrets Management<br/>- Vault / AWS Secrets<br/>- No Hardcoded Keys"]
Backup["Encrypted Backups<br/>- AES-256<br/>- Off-site Storage"]
end
User["👤 Usuario"] -->|HTTPS| WAF
WAF --> CDN
CDN --> Layer2
Layer2 --> Layer3
Layer3 --> Layer4
Layer4 --> Layer5
classDef perimeterStyle fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c62828,stroke-width:2px
classDef frontendStyle fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0,stroke-width:2px
classDef apiStyle fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#e65100,stroke-width:2px
classDef dbStyle fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px
classDef infraStyle fill:#f3e5f5,stroke:#6a1b9a,stroke-width:2px
class WAF,CDN perimeterStyle
class AuthGuard,CSP,Sanitization frontendStyle
class JWTAuth,RBAC,TenantIsolation,RateLimit,InputValidation,CORS apiStyle
class RowLevel,Encryption,Parameterized,Audit dbStyle
class NetworkSeg,Encryption2,Secrets,Backup infraStyle
2. Flujo de Autenticación y Autorización...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
[grammar] ~61-~61: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ...ackup infraStyle
## 2. Flujo de Autenticación y Autorización
```mermaid
graph TB
...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
---
[grammar] ~61-~61: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ...
2. Flujo de Autenticación y Autorización
graph TB
Start([Usuario accede a la app])
Start --> CheckToken{¿Tiene token<br/>válido?}
CheckToken -->|No| ShowLogin[Mostrar Login]
ShowLogin --> EnterCreds[Usuario ingresa credenciales]
EnterCreds --> ValidateCreds{Validar<br/>credenciales}
ValidateCreds -->|Inválidas| IncrementAttempts[Incrementar intentos fallidos]
IncrementAttempts --> CheckAttempts{Intentos >= 5?}
CheckAttempts -->|Sí| BlockUser[Bloquear usuario]
BlockUser --> ShowError1[Mostrar: Usuario bloqueado]
CheckAttempts -->|No| ShowError2[Mostrar: Credenciales incorrectas]
ShowError2 --> ShowLogin
ValidateCreds -->|Válidas| CheckStatus{Estado usuario<br/>activo?}
CheckStatus -->|No| ShowError3[Mostrar: Usuario inactivo]
CheckStatus -->|Sí| GenerateJWT[Generar JWT con payload:<br/>userId, cooperativaId,<br/>roles, permissions]
GenerateJWT --> StoreSession[Guardar sesión en Redis<br/>y PostgreSQL]
StoreSession --> ReturnToken[Retornar token + refreshToken]
ReturnToken --> StoreInBrowser[Almacenar en LocalStorage]
StoreInBrowser --> SetAuthHeader[Configurar header:<br/>Authorization: Bearer token]
CheckToken -->|Sí| ValidateToken{Token válido<br/>y no expirado?}
ValidateToken -->|No| TryRefresh{¿Tiene<br/>refreshToken?}
TryRefresh -->|No| ShowLogin
TryRefresh -->|Sí| RefreshToken[Solicitar nuevo token]
RefreshToken --> ValidateRefresh{RefreshToken<br/>válido?}
ValidateRefresh -->|No| ShowLogin
ValidateRefresh -->|Sí| GenerateJWT
ValidateToken -->|Sí| ExtractPayload[Extraer payload del token]
ExtractPayload --> CheckRoute{Ruta requiere<br/>roles/permisos?}
CheckRoute -->|No| AllowAccess[Permitir acceso]
CheckRoute -->|Sí| CheckRole{Usuario tiene<br/>rol requerido?}
CheckRole -->|No| ShowUnauth[Mostrar: No autorizado]
CheckRole -->|Sí| CheckPermission{Usuario tiene<br/>permiso requerido?}
CheckPermission -->|No| ShowUnauth
CheckPermission -->|Sí| InjectTenant[Inyectar cooperativaId<br/>en contexto request]
InjectTenant --> AllowAccess
AllowAccess --> ExecuteRequest[Ejecutar operación]
ExecuteRequest --> FilterByTenant[Aplicar filtro:<br/>WHERE cooperativa_id = X]
FilterByTenant --> LogAudit[Registrar en audit_logs]
LogAudit --> ReturnResponse[Retornar respuesta]
style Start fill:#e8f5e9
style AllowAccess fill:#c8e6c9
style ShowError1 fill:#ffcdd2
style ShowError2 fill:#ffcdd2
style ShowError3 fill:#ffcdd2
style ShowUnauth fill:#ffcdd2
style BlockUser fill:#ef5350
3. Arquitectura Multi-tenant (Row-Level ...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
[grammar] ~122-~122: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ...fill:#ef5350
## 3. Arquitectura Multi-tenant (Row-Level Security)
```merma...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
</details>
</details>
<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>
In prompts/DIAGRAMA_SEGURIDAD.md around lines 1 to 189, the architecture doc
omits critical implementation details and verification steps required before
deployment; update the document to (1) define both idle and absolute session
timeouts (suggest idle 15–30 min, absolute 8h) and show where they're enforced;
(2) specify rate-limiting hierarchy and Redis config (global, per-IP, per-user,
per-endpoint limits; key naming, TTLs, eviction policy) and how distributed
clients are aggregated; (3) add a secrets rotation plan with key versioning and
zero-downtime strategy (multiple active signing keys, Vault/AWS Secrets Manager
usage and rollout steps); (4) enumerate which fields/tables require encryption
at rest, state whether using pgcrypto or application-level encryption, and note
key management and performance considerations; and (5) add an MFA roadmap (TOTP
primary, SMS fallback, hardware keys for admins) and mark verification checklist
items to track completion.
</details>
<!-- fingerprinting:phantom:triton:mongoose -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
prompts/PROJECT_SUMMARY.md
Outdated
| | Métrica | Valor | | ||
| |---------|-------| | ||
| | **Total Tickets** | 427 tickets | | ||
| | **Esfuerzo Total** | ~1,056 horas | | ||
| | **Duración Estimada** | ~26.4 semanas (6.6 meses) | | ||
| | **Bloques de Trabajo** | 9 bloques de 50 tickets | | ||
| | **User Stories** | 5 historias completas | | ||
| | **Documentos Generados** | 12 archivos markdown | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ajustar ligera inconsistencia en el total de horas
Los números no son del todo consistentes:
- “Esfuerzo Total: ~1,056 horas” (tabla global)
- Suma de esfuerzos por bloque (119 + 121.5 + 118.5 + 120 + 123.5 + 128 + 131.5 + 127.5 + 65.5) ≈ 1,055 horas
- Suma del desglose por fase (US‑001…US‑005 + Infrastructure & DevOps + Polish & Launch) da 1,056 horas.
Sugiero elegir una de las dos referencias como “fuente de verdad” (por ejemplo, la suma por bloque) y ajustar el otro valor en 1h para que todas las tablas cuenten la misma historia.
Also applies to: 103-114
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~76-~76: Cambia la palabra o signo.
Context: ... Números Globales
| Métrica | Valor |
|---|---|
| Total Tickets... |
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_SPACE)
[grammar] ~77-~77: Cambia la palabra o signo.
Context: ...| Métrica | Valor |
|---------|-------|
| Total Tickets | 427 tickets |
| *...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_SPACE)
[grammar] ~78-~78: Cambia la palabra o signo.
Context: ...--|
| Total Tickets | 427 tickets |
| Esfuerzo Total | ~1,056 horas |
|...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_SPACE)
[grammar] ~79-~79: Cambia la palabra o signo.
Context: ...|
| Esfuerzo Total | ~1,056 horas |
| Duración Estimada | ~26.4 semanas ...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_SPACE)
[grammar] ~80-~80: Cambia la palabra o signo.
Context: ...Estimada** | ~26.4 semanas (6.6 meses) |
| Bloques de Trabajo | 9 bloques de ...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_SPACE)
[grammar] ~81-~81: Cambia la palabra o signo.
Context: ...de Trabajo** | 9 bloques de 50 tickets |
| User Stories | 5 historias complet...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_SPACE)
[grammar] ~82-~82: Cambia la palabra o signo.
Context: ...User Stories** | 5 historias completas |
| Documentos Generados | 12 archivos...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_SPACE)
prompts/work_tickets_bloque_04.md
Outdated
| ## 🧪 Módulo: Testing y Calidad | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| #### **TICKET-199: Crear suite de tests E2E para flujo completo de cliente** | ||
|
|
||
| **Título:** Crear suite de tests E2E para flujo completo de cliente | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix heading hierarchy violation.
Line 1122 skips a heading level (from ## to ####). Change to a proper h3 heading.
- ## 🧪 Módulo: Testing y Calidad
+ ### 🧪 Módulo: Testing y Calidad🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~1118-~1118: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ...
🧪 Módulo: Testing y Calidad
**TICKET-199: Crear suite de tests E2E par...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
[grammar] ~1122-~1122: Aquí puede haber un error.
Context: ...tests E2E para flujo completo de cliente**
Título: Crear suite de tests E2E para ...
(QB_NEW_ES)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
1122-1122: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h3; Actual: h4
(MD001, heading-increment)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In prompts/work_tickets_bloque_04.md around lines 1118 to 1125, the heading
hierarchy jumps from "## 🧪 Módulo: Testing y Calidad" to a "#### **TICKET-199:
Crear suite de tests E2E para flujo completo de cliente**" which skips an H3
level; change that "####" to "###" so the ticket title is a proper H3 under the
module heading, keeping the rest of the content unchanged.
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.