Conversation
WalkthroughEstablishes comprehensive Cypress E2E testing infrastructure for the frontend Position interface, adding configuration, custom drag-and-drop command, and test suites with position and smoke tests. Components instrumented with data-testid attributes. Backend dependencies updated and seed data adjusted. Documentation framework and testing guidelines added. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
.claude/commands/analyze-codebase.md (1)
102-102: Minor style suggestion for conciseness.Consider simplifying "all of the output" to "all output" for more concise writing.
- At the end, write all of the output into a file called "codebase_analysis.md" + At the end, write all output into a file called "codebase_analysis.md"frontend/cypress/e2e/smoke.spec.js (1)
1-9: Smoke tests look good; optional stronger check for drag commandThe two checks (homepage visibility and
cy.dragAndDropbeing defined) are a solid, fast smoke layer. If you later want a slightly stronger signal, you could also callcy.dragAndDropin a simple scenario once the DnD DOM is present to ensure it runs without throwing, but this is not required for this PR.backend/package.json (1)
13-16: DB reset tooling and ts-node upgrade fit the test flowThe Prisma scripts and
db:reset:testhook line up with the Cypresscy.execusage, and upgradingts-nodeto^10.9.2resolves the earlier compatibility issue with your TypeScript/Prisma stack. If you want to DRY things up later,db:reset:testcould simply delegate tonpm run prisma:reset, but the current setup is perfectly fine.Also applies to: 44-44
frontend/cypress/support/commands.js (1)
1-99: dragAndDrop implementation is solid; JSDoc is out of sync with actual behaviorThe command logic (center-based coordinates, staged mouse moves on
source/body, and short waits) is a reasonable approach for react-beautiful-dnd and matches how your tests use it. The main gap is in the header comments: they still describe an HTML5 drag event/DataTransfer sequence and older selector names, which the implementation no longer uses. Updating the JSDoc (event list, waits, and example selectors) to reflect the current mouse-event–driven approach will make this easier to maintain.frontend/cypress/e2e/position.spec.js (2)
5-17: DB reset in beforeEach gives good isolation; consider improving the wait and command portabilityResetting the DB via
npm run db:reset:testbefore each test plus waiting on the initial GET intercepts is a solid isolation strategy. The extracy.wait(200)is a pragmatic flakiness fix, but if you run into future timing issues you might consider:
- Exposing a lightweight backend “health/ready” check and polling that instead of a fixed sleep, and/or
- Using a more shell-agnostic command like
npm --prefix ../backend run db:reset:testto avoidcd ... &&issues on non-Unix shells.Not blocking, but worth keeping in mind as the suite evolves.
120-149: Network error test could assert the error path more explicitlyThe network error scenario currently sets
forceNetworkErroronGET /interviewFlowand then checks that the position title still exists, but it never waits on@networkErroror asserts any specific error-handling behavior. To make this test more robust and self-explanatory, consider:
- Adding
cy.wait('@networkError')to confirm the failure actually occurred, and- Asserting whatever the intended UX is in this case (e.g., an error banner, fallback content, or a retry state), or renaming the test if the goal is simply to ensure the app doesn’t crash.
prompts/prompts-ldlb.md (1)
55-60: Prompts doc is slightly out of sync with the current implementation (plus a few typos)A couple of small doc cleanups would make this file better match the code you ended up shipping:
- The drag-and-drop prompt still talks about a full HTML5
dragstart/dragover/drop+ DataTransfer flow and specific 100ms/200ms waits, while the actualdragAndDropcommand now uses mouse events and different timings. It’d be helpful to update the description to match what’s implemented.- The E2E prompt states “No arbitrary waits (
cy.wait(milliseconds)),” but the final suite intentionally uses short fixed waits (DB reset + drag animation) for stability. Clarifying this trade-off will avoid confusion for future readers.- Minor wording/typo fixes like “Gemni Pro” → “Gemini Pro” and softening “I told Claude to create…” to “I asked Claude to create…” will polish the narrative.
All of these are documentation-only; the code itself is consistent.
Also applies to: 119-127, 398-408, 511-511, 690-690
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
backend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonfrontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonprompts/ClaudePlan.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngprompts/GeminiResponse.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
.claude/commands/analyze-codebase.md(1 hunks)backend/package.json(2 hunks)backend/prisma/seed.ts(1 hunks)frontend/cypress.config.js(1 hunks)frontend/cypress/.eslintrc.json(1 hunks)frontend/cypress/e2e/position.spec.js(1 hunks)frontend/cypress/e2e/smoke.spec.js(1 hunks)frontend/cypress/support/commands.js(1 hunks)frontend/cypress/support/e2e.js(1 hunks)frontend/package.json(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/CandidateCard.js(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/PositionDetails.js(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/StageColumn.js(1 hunks)prompts/context/codebase_analysis.md(1 hunks)prompts/prompts-ldlb.md(1 hunks)prompts/requirement.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
frontend/src/components/CandidateCard.js (1)
frontend/src/components/AddCandidateForm.js (1)
candidate(9-18)
🪛 Gitleaks (8.30.0)
prompts/context/codebase_analysis.md
[high] 692-692: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 LanguageTool
prompts/context/codebase_analysis.md
[grammar] ~1364-~1364: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...Objects** - Issue: Education and WorkExperience have IDs but could be value objects ...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[uncategorized] ~1421-~1421: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ... Rate Limiting - Missing: No rate limiting - Risk: DoS attacks, brute force...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[uncategorized] ~1619-~1619: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ... containerized - Recommendation: Full stack containerization - Structure: ...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[grammar] ~1718-~1718: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ... middleware to track - Target: < 200ms for simple queries - *Optimization...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
prompts/requirement.md
[grammar] ~3-~3: Corrige el error ortográfico.
Context: ...funciona correctamente mediante pruebas End-to-End (E2E). # Requisito ## Crear Pr...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_OTHERCASE)
[grammar] ~3-~3: Corrige el error ortográfico.
Context: ...a correctamente mediante pruebas End-to-End (E2E). # Requisito ## Crear Pruebas E...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_OTHERCASE)
[grammar] ~7-~7: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ...nd-to-End (E2E). # Requisito ## Crear Pruebas E2E para la Interfaz "position": Debes...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
[grammar] ~7-~7: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ...Requisito ## Crear Pruebas E2E para la Interfaz "position": Debes crear pruebas E2E pa...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
[grammar] ~11-~11: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ... siguientes escenarios: 1. Carga de la Página de Position: - Verifica que el títu...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
[grammar] ~12-~12: Cambia la forma del verbo.
Context: ...erifica que el título de la posición se muestra correctamente. - Verifica que se mu...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)
[grammar] ~15-~15: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ...ecta según su fase actual. 2. Cambio de Fase de un Candidato: - Simula el arrast...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
[grammar] ~15-~15: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ...su fase actual. 2. Cambio de Fase de un Candidato: - Simula el arrastre (drag-and-drop) de un...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
[grammar] ~20-~20: Corrige la mayúscula.
Context: ...nt PUT /candidate/:id. # Instrucciones Adicionales: - Crea un archivo de prueba position.spec....
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_UPPERCASE)
prompts/prompts-ldlb.md
[grammar] ~58-~58: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...e DataTransfer API - Include waits: 100ms after dragstart, 200ms after drop (for ...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~511-~511: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...rag-and-drop tests, so I decided to ask Gemni Pro to help with the review and validat...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[style] ~690-~690: Consider using the more polite verb “ask” (“tell” implies ordering/instructing someone).
Context: ...l issues that needed to be addressed. I told Claude to create a detailed plan to fix...
(TELL_ASK)
[style] ~690-~690: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...old Claude to create a detailed plan to fix the issues found in the review. ![Clau...
(FIX_RESOLVE)
.claude/commands/analyze-codebase.md
[style] ~102-~102: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ... decision-making. At the end, write all of the output into a file called “codebase_ana...
(ALL_OF_THE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
prompts/context/codebase_analysis.md
36-36: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
54-54: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
122-122: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
460-460: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
584-584: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
622-622: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
758-758: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
759-759: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
1053-1053: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
1195-1195: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
1272-1272: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
frontend/src/components/PositionDetails.js (1)
109-113: LGTM! Test attributes added correctly.The data-testid attributes follow best practices for E2E testing and provide stable selectors for the Cypress tests. The naming is clear and descriptive.
frontend/package.json (1)
32-35: LGTM! Cypress integration looks good.The Cypress scripts and dependency are correctly configured. Version 15.7.0 is a recent stable release.
frontend/cypress/support/e2e.js (1)
1-1: LGTM! Standard Cypress setup.The import statement correctly loads custom commands for use in E2E tests.
frontend/cypress/.eslintrc.json (1)
1-5: LGTM! Proper Cypress ESLint configuration.Correctly enables the Cypress environment for ESLint, which provides type definitions for Cypress globals.
backend/prisma/seed.ts (1)
235-242: LGTM! Fixes interview step ordering.The change ensures Manager Interview has a unique orderIndex (3) instead of duplicating the Technical Interview's index (2). This creates proper sequential ordering: Initial Screening (1) → Technical Interview (2) → Manager Interview (3).
frontend/src/components/CandidateCard.js (1)
14-17: Test IDs on CandidateCard align with Cypress selectorsThe added
data-testidattributes (candidate-card-${candidate.id},candidate-name-${candidate.id}) give stable hooks for the E2E specs while keeping all react-beautiful-dnd props and behavior intact. This matches the documented pattern and the selectors used inposition.spec.js.frontend/cypress.config.js (1)
1-18: Cypress configuration matches project layout and test needs
baseUrl,env.apiUrl,specPattern, and timeouts line up with how the specs run and with the DB reset viacy.exec. This is a good, minimal config; if you later add more environments, you can move the URLs to external env vars without changing tests.frontend/src/components/StageColumn.js (1)
7-11: StageColumn test IDs are consistent and preserve Droppable wiringThe added
stage-column-${stage.id},droppable-zone-${stage.id}, andcolumn-header-${stage.id}test IDs give precise selectors for the E2E tests, and you correctly keepref={provided.innerRef}and{...provided.droppableProps}on the droppable container, so react-beautiful-dnd behavior is preserved.frontend/cypress/e2e/position.spec.js (1)
19-60: Strong end-to-end coverage of initial state and happy-path drag-and-dropThe Page Load suite plus the first Drag and Drop test give a clear, deterministic check that:
- Seed data is wired correctly (title, stages, initial candidates per column), and
- Moving Carlos from stage 1 → 2 triggers the expected PUT payload and UI update.
The combination of
cy.interceptbody assertions, alias waits, anddata-testidselectors makes these tests both readable and resilient.Also applies to: 62-94
| it('should maintain candidate order after drag and drop', () => { | ||
| cy.intercept('PUT', `${API_URL}/candidates/1`, { | ||
| statusCode: 200, | ||
| body: { data: { currentInterviewStep: 3 } }, | ||
| }).as('updateCandidate'); | ||
|
|
||
| cy.get('[data-testid="droppable-zone-2"]') | ||
| .find('[data-testid^="candidate-card-"]') | ||
| .should('have.length', 2); | ||
|
|
||
| cy.dragAndDrop('[data-testid="candidate-card-1"]', '[data-testid="droppable-zone-3"]'); | ||
|
|
||
| cy.wait('@updateCandidate'); | ||
|
|
||
| cy.get('[data-testid="droppable-zone-3"]').within(() => { | ||
| cy.get('[data-testid="candidate-card-1"]').should('exist'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| cy.get('[data-testid="droppable-zone-2"]') | ||
| .find('[data-testid^="candidate-card-"]') | ||
| .should('have.length', 1); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
# First, let's look at the full test file around the mentioned lines to understand context
cd frontend/cypress/e2e && wc -l position.spec.jsRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-qa-2509-R
Length of output: 204
🏁 Script executed:
# Get the full context of drag and drop tests in the file
cd frontend/cypress/e2e && sed -n '70,130p' position.spec.jsRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-qa-2509-R
Length of output: 204
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for other drag and drop related tests in the file
cd frontend/cypress/e2e && rg -n "dragAndDrop|candidate.*order|ordering" position.spec.jsRepository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-qa-2509-R
Length of output: 204
🏁 Script executed:
# Check if there are any other position-related spec files
fd -t f "position" frontend/cypress/Repository: LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-qa-2509-R
Length of output: 204
Test name doesn't match assertions—either validate order or rename
This test verifies that a dragged candidate moves to the target zone and source zone count decreases, but it doesn't assert any ordering behavior despite the test name. Either add explicit order checks (e.g., verify remaining candidates maintain their relative positions) or rename the test to reflect what it actually validates (e.g., "moves candidate between zones and updates counts").
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/cypress/e2e/position.spec.js around lines 96 to 117, the test title
("should maintain candidate order after drag and drop") claims to check ordering
but only verifies movement and counts; either rename the test to reflect its
current checks (e.g., "moves candidate between zones and updates counts") or add
explicit order assertions: capture the list of candidate-card elements (their
data-testid or text) in the source zone before the drag, perform the drag, wait
for the update, then assert the remaining list in the source zone preserves the
same relative order and that the moved candidate appears in the correct position
in the target zone. Ensure assertions are deterministic (use .then to extract
IDs/text and compare arrays) and keep the intercept/wait logic as-is.
| #### Backend `.env` | ||
| ```bash | ||
| # Database connection | ||
| DATABASE_URL=postgresql://LTIdbUser:D1ymf8wyQEGthFR1E9xhCq@localhost:5432/LTIdb | ||
|
|
||
| # Docker database configuration | ||
| DB_USER=LTIdbUser | ||
| DB_PASSWORD=D1ymf8wyQEGthFR1E9xhCq | ||
| DB_NAME=LTIdb | ||
| DB_PORT=5432 | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove hardcoded credentials from documentation.
The documentation contains actual database credentials that should not be committed to the repository. Even in example documentation, real credentials pose a security risk.
Replace with placeholder values:
#### Backend `.env`
```bash
# Database connection
-DATABASE_URL=postgresql://LTIdbUser:D1ymf8wyQEGthFR1E9xhCq@localhost:5432/LTIdb
+DATABASE_URL=postgresql://username:password@localhost:5432/database_name
# Docker database configuration
-DB_USER=LTIdbUser
-DB_PASSWORD=D1ymf8wyQEGthFR1E9xhCq
-DB_NAME=LTIdb
+DB_USER=your_db_user
+DB_PASSWORD=your_db_password
+DB_NAME=your_db_name
DB_PORT=5432
**Important:** If these are real production credentials, they should be rotated immediately as they are now exposed in git history.
<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>
<details>
<summary>🪛 Gitleaks (8.30.0)</summary>
[high] 692-692: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
</details>
</details>
<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>
In prompts/context/codebase_analysis.md around lines 685 to 695, the
documentation contains hardcoded database credentials; replace the real
credentials with safe placeholders (e.g., set DATABASE_URL to
postgresql://username:password@localhost:5432/database_name and replace DB_USER,
DB_PASSWORD, DB_NAME with your_db_user, your_db_password, your_db_name) and save
the file; if those credentials are real and committed, rotate them immediately
and consider removing them from git history.
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
| - Crea un archivo de prueba position.spec.js en la carpeta /cypress/integration. | ||
| - Escribe pruebas E2E para verificar la carga de la página y el cambio de fase de un candidato. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update path to match Cypress 10+ convention.
The documentation references the outdated /cypress/integration path. Cypress 10+ (including v15.7.0 used in this PR) uses /cypress/e2e as the standard directory for E2E tests.
-- Crea un archivo de prueba position.spec.js en la carpeta /cypress/integration.
+- Crea un archivo de prueba position.spec.js en la carpeta /cypress/e2e.
- Escribe pruebas E2E para verificar la carga de la página y el cambio de fase de un candidato.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - Crea un archivo de prueba position.spec.js en la carpeta /cypress/integration. | |
| - Escribe pruebas E2E para verificar la carga de la página y el cambio de fase de un candidato. | |
| - Crea un archivo de prueba position.spec.js en la carpeta /cypress/e2e. | |
| - Escribe pruebas E2E para verificar la carga de la página y el cambio de fase de un candidato. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In prompts/requirement.md around lines 22-23, the instructions reference the
deprecated /cypress/integration directory; update the path to /cypress/e2e to
match Cypress 10+ conventions (used in this PR). Replace "/cypress/integration"
with "/cypress/e2e" in that line and check nearby text for any other references
to the old path, updating them as well.
💬 Muy buen setup E2E, con detalles finos por pulir✅ Fortalezas
🛠️ Recomendaciones
|
RunningTests.mov
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.