# feat(test): Implementar suite completa de pruebas E2E para interfaz Position#5
# feat(test): Implementar suite completa de pruebas E2E para interfaz Position#5gzaratet-dev wants to merge 18 commits intoLIDR-academy:mainfrom
Conversation
- Add prisma/**/*.ts to backend/tsconfig.json so prisma seed compiles. - Add comprehensive codebase analysis at docs/codebase-analysis.md. NOTE: backend/test-seed.js remains untracked and .gitignore is modified but not staged (intentional).
- Created detailed E2E testing plan using Cypress and Page Object Model - Includes 7-stage implementation plan with time estimates - Defines architecture with Page Objects and Component Objects - Covers page load verification and drag-and-drop functionality - Includes best practices, configuration examples, and checklists
- Removed **/prisma/migrations/*.sql from .gitignore - Prisma migration files are source of truth and must be tracked - Added explanatory comment about migration files importance
- Install Cypress v15.7.1 as dev dependency - Create cypress.config.js with baseUrl and API configuration - Set up complete folder structure following Page Object Model pattern - Create base Page Objects: * BasePage.js - Base class for all page objects * PositionsListPage.js - Page object for positions list * PositionDetailsPage.js - Page object for position details * StageColumnComponent.js - Component object for stage columns * CandidateCardComponent.js - Component object for candidate cards - Create utility helpers: * api-helpers.js - API interceptors and wait utilities * test-data-helpers.js - Test data manipulation utilities - Add Cypress scripts to package.json: * cypress:open - Open interactive test runner * cypress:run - Run tests headless * cypress:run:headless - Run tests in headless mode - Create placeholder test file: position.spec.cy.js - Add README.md with structure documentation This completes Etapa 1 of the E2E testing plan.
- Create interviewFlows.json fixture with complete interview flow structure * 4 interview stages: Initial Review, Technical Interview, Final Interview, Offer * Includes positionName and nested structure matching API response - Create candidates.json fixture with 6 candidates distributed across stages * Candidates in different stages for testing various scenarios * Includes: candidateId, fullName, currentInterviewStep, applicationId, averageScore * Distribution: 2 in Initial Review, 2 in Technical Interview, 1 in Final Interview, 1 in Offer - Create positions.json fixture with 3 example positions * Different statuses: Open, Draft * Includes all relevant position fields - Enhance test-data-helpers.js with additional utility functions: * getCandidateById() - Get candidate by ID * getCandidateByName() - Get candidate by full name * getPositionById() - Get position by ID * getStageNames() - Get all stage names from interview flow * getStageIdByName() - Get stage ID by name * countCandidatesByStage() - Count candidates per stage * generateCandidateData() - Generate dynamic candidate data - Add README.md in fixtures directory with: * Documentation of each fixture structure * Usage examples * Helper function examples * Maintenance guidelines This completes Etapa 2 of the E2E testing plan.
…nctions - Add clarification in JSDoc that parameter must be the complete fixture object - Verified that three levels of interviewFlow nesting is correct - Functions work correctly with interviewFlow.interviewFlow.interviewFlow.interviewSteps path - This matches the actual fixture structure and API response format
- Enhance BasePage with additional utility methods: * waitForElement() - Wait for element visibility with timeout * waitForText() - Wait for element to contain specific text * verifyUrl() - Verify current URL matches expected * scrollTo() - Scroll element into view - Improve PositionsListPage with real frontend selectors: * getPositionCards() - Get all position cards * getPositionCardByTitle() - Get specific position card * navigateToPositionByTitle() - Navigate by position title * verifyPositionExists() - Verify position in list * getPositionsCount() - Get total positions count - Complete PositionDetailsPage with additional methods: * getBackButton() / goBackToPositions() - Navigation methods * getStageColumnsCount() - Get total stage columns count * verifyStageColumnsCount() - Verify expected columns count * verifyCandidatesInColumns() - Verify candidate distribution * getCandidateCard() - Get specific candidate card - Enhance StageColumnComponent with advanced methods: * getCardBody() - Get column card body * getDroppableId() - Get react-beautiful-dnd droppableId * getCandidateCard() - Get specific candidate card in column * getCandidateNames() - Get all candidate names in column - Complete CandidateCardComponent with full functionality: * getCardBody() - Get card body element * getRating() / verifyRating() - Rating verification methods * getDraggableId() - Get react-beautiful-dnd draggableId * getCandidateId() - Extract candidate ID from draggableId * verifyIsVisible() - Verify card visibility - All selectors based on actual frontend structure: * Bootstrap Card components (.card, .card-header, .card-body) * react-beautiful-dnd integration (droppableId, draggableId) * Real component hierarchy matching PositionDetails.js This completes Etapa 3 of the E2E testing plan.
- Implementar pruebas E2E para verificación de carga de página - Configurar interceptores de API en beforeEach - Agregar pruebas para: * Verificación del título de la posición * Verificación de columnas de fase (todas las columnas y conteo) * Verificación de distribución de candidatos en columnas * Verificación de ratings de candidatos * Verificación de visibilidad de columnas * Prueba de navegación (volver a lista) - Usar Page Objects y fixtures creados en etapas anteriores - Preparar estructura para Etapa 5 (drag-and-drop)
- Instalar @4tw/cypress-drag-drop para soporte de drag-and-drop - Configurar comando de drag-and-drop en commands.js - Implementar método dragTo() en CandidateCardComponent - Agregar helpers para interceptar PUT /candidates/:id * setupCandidateUpdateInterceptor() * waitForCandidateUpdate() - Agregar métodos helper al PositionDetailsPage: * dragCandidateToStage() * verifyCandidateInStage() * verifyCandidateNotInStage() - Implementar 5 pruebas de drag-and-drop: * Drag-and-drop básico (movimiento visual) * Verificación de actualización en backend * Drag-and-drop a columna vacía * Mantener orden de candidatos * Múltiples operaciones de drag-and-drop - Todas las pruebas verifican movimiento visual y actualización en backend
- Agregar 3 comandos personalizados de Cypress: * cy.waitForApi() - Esperar llamadas API con timeout personalizable * cy.verifyApiCall() - Verificar llamadas API con parámetros esperados * cy.shouldBeVisibleWithText() - Verificar visibilidad y texto - Agregar 6 pruebas de edge cases y manejo de errores: * Manejo de error 500 en actualización de candidato * Manejo de error de red (network error) * Arrastrar candidato a la misma columna * Arrastrar a columna vacía * Múltiples candidatos en la misma columna * Manejo de datos faltantes en carga de página - Mejorar documentación en README: * Documentación de comandos personalizados con ejemplos * Estructura de pruebas explicada * Mejores prácticas de testing * Guía de troubleshooting * Recursos adicionales - Las pruebas ahora cubren casos límite y escenarios de error
- Crear guía completa de uso (E2E_TESTING_GUIDE.md): * Inicio rápido y requisitos previos * Cómo ejecutar pruebas (interactivo y headless) * Cómo agregar nuevas pruebas con ejemplos * Guía completa de Page Objects * Uso de fixtures y datos de prueba * Comandos personalizados disponibles * Mejores prácticas de testing - Crear guía de troubleshooting (E2E_TROUBLESHOOTING.md): * Problemas de configuración y soluciones * Problemas de ejecución y timing * Problemas de selectores y drag-and-drop * Problemas de API e interceptores * Guía completa de debugging * Comandos útiles para debugging - Crear resumen del proyecto (E2E_TESTING_SUMMARY.md): * Visión general y estadísticas completas * Estructura del proyecto detallada * Lista de todas las etapas completadas * Lista de todas las pruebas (19 pruebas) * Tecnologías utilizadas * Cobertura de requisitos * Próximos pasos opcionales - Actualizar README de Cypress con referencias a nueva documentación - Proyecto de testing E2E completamente documentado y listo para uso
- Crear directorio prompts/ con análisis detallado de todos los prompts - Incluir clasificación por categorías temáticas (6 categorías) - Documentar todas las 7 etapas del plan de implementación - Incluir Etapas 1 y 2 (implícitas) y prompt generador del documento - Agregar métricas, patrones y observaciones de la sesión - Actualizar .gitignore para incluir directorio prompts en documentación
WalkthroughEnvironment configuration is refactored to use example templates and runtime variables instead of hardcoded credentials. Database URL in Prisma schema is updated to use environment variables. Comprehensive End-to-End testing infrastructure is added using Cypress with Page Object Model, including configuration, page objects, test utilities, fixtures, and a full test suite for the Position interface. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (18)
docs/codebase-analysis.md (4)
1-50: Verify PR scope alignment—consider splitting this into a separate documentation PR.This comprehensive codebase analysis is valuable but appears orthogonal to the E2E testing infrastructure changes described in the PR objectives. The PR objectives focus on implementing Cypress E2E tests with Page Object Model for the Position interface, while this 1483-line document provides a complete architectural overview of the entire system.
Recommendation: Consider either:
- Moving this file to a separate documentation-focused PR
- Adding a brief section specifically about the E2E testing infrastructure (Cypress setup, test structure, POM implementation) if it's meant to accompany the testing changes
- Keeping it in this PR only if it's considered foundational documentation for onboarding developers to the testing infrastructure
755-849: Add E2E testing documentation to the API specification section.The API specification section documents REST endpoints but does not cover the E2E testing approach or test structure. Since this PR introduces comprehensive E2E tests, consider adding a subsection documenting:
- How the tests use the API endpoints
- Test data fixtures and their relationship to the API contracts
- Verification of backend state changes via API calls (e.g., PUT /candidates/:id for drag-and-drop verification)
This would align the documentation with the actual testing infrastructure being added.
1389-1441: Add E2E testing to "Mejoras Técnicas Propuestas" (Recommended Improvements).The recommendations section suggests containerization, authentication, API versioning, caching, and CI/CD, but does not mention the E2E testing infrastructure that is being implemented in this PR. Consider adding a recommendation entry such as:
"6. E2E Testing with Cypress (✅ Implemented)
- Page Object Model pattern for maintainability
- Comprehensive test coverage for user flows
- Integration with backend API verification
- CI/CD integration for automated test execution"
This would document the testing improvements being introduced and provide context for future developers.
1-1483: Address Spanish grammar and formatting issues flagged by static analysis.Static analysis identified approximately 120 grammar and style issues throughout the document, primarily:
- Capitalization of section headings and list items (e.g., lines 315, 325, 372)
- Spacing inconsistencies in lists and code blocks (lines 564-567, 1241)
- Punctuation in bullet points (line 789, 1179)
- False positives in code/diagram sections (largely ignorable)
Many are minor, but a thorough review and correction pass is recommended for a public-facing documentation file. Priority fixes:
- Line 1162: "Manifesto" → "Manifiesto" (orthographic error)
- Line 1434: "Quotas" → consider Spanish alternative; anglicism
- Lines 1446-1452: Consistency in reference list formatting
frontend/package.json (1)
55-58: Consider pinning exact versions in package.json for E2E test reproducibility.The caret (
^) version ranges allow minor and patch updates, which can introduce subtle test flakiness or behavior changes. For E2E tests where reproducibility is critical, consider using exact versions (cypress: "15.7.1"instead of^15.7.1) or at minimum tilde ranges (~15.7.1) to lock patch versions..env.example (1)
4-8: Consider reordering environment variables for consistency.The dotenv-linter flagged that CORS_ORIGIN (line 7) should come before NODE_ENV (line 5). While this is a minor style preference, aligning with linter expectations improves consistency across .env templates.
Apply this diff to align with key ordering expectations:
# Application - NODE_ENV=development - PORT=3010 CORS_ORIGIN=http://localhost:3000 + NODE_ENV=development + PORT=3010frontend/cypress/fixtures/interviewFlows.json (1)
1-29: Revisa el doble anidamientointerviewFlow.interviewFlowLa estructura actual expone los pasos como
interviewFlow.interviewFlow.interviewSteps. Si esto refleja exactamente la respuesta real del backend, perfecto. Si en la API la forma es algo como{ interviewFlow: { interviewSteps, positionName } }, te convendría aplanar el fixture para evitar confusión en los selectores de datos.Por ejemplo, si quisieras simplificar:
-{ - "interviewFlow": { - "interviewFlow": { - "interviewSteps": [ /* ... */ ] - }, - "positionName": "Senior Software Engineer" - } -} +{ + "interviewFlow": { + "interviewSteps": [ /* ... */ ], + "positionName": "Senior Software Engineer" + } +}Confirma que la forma del JSON coincide con el contrato real del endpoint que interceptas antes de cambiar nada.
docs/E2E_TESTING_SUMMARY.md (1)
26-49: Especifica un lenguaje en el bloque de código del árbol de proyectoEl bloque con la estructura de
frontend/cypress/usa ``` sin lenguaje, lo que dispara la regla MD040 de markdownlint. Puedes marcarlo como texto plano para mejorar el linting y la legibilidad:-``` +```text frontend/cypress/ ├── e2e/ @@ └── README.md # Documentación de Cypress -``` +```Resto del resumen se ve muy alineado con el PR.
frontend/cypress.config.js (1)
3-19: Config de Cypress correcta; podrías parametrizar URLs vía variables de entornoLa configuración actual es perfectamente válida para el escenario descrito (frontend en
3000, backend en3010). Si en el futuro quieres reutilizar las pruebas en CI o en otros entornos, podrías hacer las URLs configurables:module.exports = defineConfig({ e2e: { - baseUrl: 'http://localhost:3000', + baseUrl: process.env.CYPRESS_BASE_URL || 'http://localhost:3000', @@ - env: { - apiUrl: 'http://localhost:3010' - } + env: { + apiUrl: process.env.CYPRESS_API_URL || 'http://localhost:3010' + } }, });Así puedes ajustar
CYPRESS_BASE_URLyCYPRESS_API_URLdesde el entorno sin tocar código.docs/E2E_TROUBLESHOOTING.md (1)
19-36: Añade lenguaje a los bloques de código de mensajes de errorAlgunos bloques usados para mostrar mensajes de error usan ``` sin lenguaje (por ejemplo, el de
"Cannot find module 'cypress'"), lo que dispara MD040. Puedes marcarlos como texto plano:-**Síntoma:** -``` -Error: Cannot find module 'cypress' -``` +**Síntoma:** +```text +Error: Cannot find module 'cypress' +```Repetir el mismo ajuste (
```text) en los demás bloques similares (ECONNREFUSED,Timed out retrying,cy.wait() timed out..., etc.) dejará el documento alineado con las reglas de markdownlint sin cambiar el contenido.frontend/cypress/README.md (1)
7-29: Optional: Add language identifier to fenced code block.The directory structure code block is missing a language identifier. While not critical, adding one improves syntax highlighting and accessibility.
Apply this diff:
-``` +```text cypress/ ├── e2e/ # Archivos de pruebas E2Edocs/E2E_TESTING_GUIDE.md (1)
144-152: Optional: Add language identifiers to fenced code blocks.Two code blocks showing directory structure are missing language identifiers (lines 144-152 and 308-312).
For the block at lines 144-152:
-``` +```text cypress/support/page-objects/For the block at lines 308-312:
-``` +```text cypress/e2e/Also applies to: 308-312
frontend/cypress/support/page-objects/components/CandidateCardComponent.js (1)
70-75: Consider explicit error handling for invalid draggableId.The method returns
nullwhen draggableId is falsy, butparseInt(null)would returnNaN, notnull. Consider explicit validation.Apply this diff for clearer error handling:
getCandidateId() { return this.getDraggableId().then((draggableId) => { - // El draggableId es el candidate.id que es candidateId.toString() - return draggableId ? parseInt(draggableId) : null; + if (!draggableId) { + return null; + } + const id = parseInt(draggableId, 10); + return isNaN(id) ? null : id; }); }frontend/cypress/support/page-objects/components/StageColumnComponent.js (1)
44-57: Consider optimizing getDroppableId() implementation.The current implementation iterates through all headers to find the index. This could be simplified using Cypress commands more idiomatically.
Apply this diff for a more Cypress-idiomatic approach:
getDroppableId() { - // Necesitamos encontrar el índice de esta columna - // Esto se puede hacer contando las columnas anteriores - return cy.get('.card-header').then(($headers) => { - let index = -1; - for (let i = 0; i < $headers.length; i++) { - if ($headers.eq(i).text().includes(this.stageName)) { - index = i; - break; - } - } - return index.toString(); - }); + return this.getTitle().then(($title) => { + return cy.get('.card-header').then(($headers) => { + const index = Array.from($headers).findIndex(header => + Cypress.$(header).text().includes(this.stageName) + ); + return index >= 0 ? index.toString() : null; + }); + }); }frontend/cypress/e2e/position/position.spec.cy.js (2)
192-192: Consider replacing hardcoded animation waits with robust assertions.Multiple tests use
cy.wait(500)to wait for drag-and-drop animations to complete. This approach can be fragile and slow down test execution.Replace hardcoded waits with assertions that wait for the expected state:
// Arrastrar John Doe a Technical Interview positionDetailsPage.dragCandidateToStage('John Doe', 'Technical Interview'); -// Esperar un momento para que se complete la animación -cy.wait(500); - // Verificar que John Doe se movió a Technical Interview +// Cypress will automatically retry this assertion until it passes positionDetailsPage.verifyCandidateInStage('John Doe', 'Technical Interview');This approach:
- Eliminates arbitrary wait times
- Makes tests faster when animations complete quickly
- Still waits as long as needed when animations are slow
- More resilient to timing variations
Also applies to: 252-252, 284-284, 305-305, 310-310, 316-316, 340-340, 364-364, 385-385, 405-405, 431-431
351-369: Optional: Add explicit error state verification for network errors.The network error test (lines 351-369) logs that the error was handled but doesn't verify the frontend's error handling behavior. Consider adding assertions for error UI states if the application displays error messages.
If the application shows error messages or UI feedback for network errors, add verification:
it('should handle network error gracefully', () => { // ... existing setup ... // Intentar arrastrar candidato positionDetailsPage.dragCandidateToStage('John Doe', 'Technical Interview'); cy.wait(500); // Verify error UI is displayed (if applicable) cy.get('[data-testid="error-message"]').should('be.visible'); // Or verify candidate remains in original position positionDetailsPage.verifyCandidateInStage('John Doe', 'Initial Review'); cy.log('Network error handled gracefully'); });frontend/cypress/support/utils/api-helpers.js (1)
5-16: Align JSDoc types with how the helpers are actually usedIn
setupPositionApiInterceptorsthe documented types don’t match runtime usage:
positionIdis documented asstring, but tests are likely passing anumber(and the template literal works with either).interviewFlowFixtureandcandidatesFixtureare documented asObject, but they are used as Cypressfixturenames (strings).To avoid confusion, consider updating the JSDoc to something like:
- * @param {string} options.positionId - ID de la posición - * @param {Object} options.interviewFlowFixture - Fixture para interview flow - * @param {Object} options.candidatesFixture - Fixture para candidatos + * @param {number|string} options.positionId - ID de la posición + * @param {string} options.interviewFlowFixture - Nombre de fixture para interview flow + * @param {string} options.candidatesFixture - Nombre de fixture para candidatosfrontend/cypress/support/utils/test-data-helpers.js (1)
108-118: Avoid randomness in default test data to keep specs deterministic
generateCandidateDatabuilds candidates usingMath.random()andDate.now(). That’s convenient for ad-hoc/manual testing, but if any spec relies on the defaults (without overriding fields), you can easily get flaky or hard-to-reproduce failures.Consider either:
- Making the defaults deterministic (e.g., using a simple incremental counter for IDs and a fixed base name), or
- Documenting and enforcing that callers must always override fields they assert on (score, names, etc.), and optionally switching to a deterministic counter for IDs.
For example, a deterministic version with a simple counter:
-let defaultId = Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000); +let nextCandidateId = 1; export function generateCandidateData(overrides = {}) { const defaultCandidate = { - candidateId: Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000), - fullName: `Test Candidate ${Date.now()}`, + candidateId: nextCandidateId++, + fullName: 'Test Candidate', currentInterviewStep: 'Initial Review', - applicationId: Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000), - averageScore: Math.floor(Math.random() * 5) + 1 + applicationId: nextCandidateId++, + averageScore: 3 }; return { ...defaultCandidate, ...overrides }; }
| docs/ | ||
| # Cypress | ||
| cypress/ No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Ignoring docs/ and cypress/ will prevent essential PR files from being tracked.
The .gitignore rules at lines 112–114 would ignore the entire docs/ and cypress/ directories. However, per the PR objectives, these directories contain critical content that must be version-controlled:
- docs/ includes the E2E testing requirements, guides, plans, and troubleshooting documentation
- frontend/cypress/ contains your entire test suite: configuration, specs, page objects, fixtures, support utilities, and commands
Removing these ignore rules will allow the comprehensive test infrastructure and documentation introduced in this PR to be properly tracked.
Apply this diff to remove the overly broad ignore rules:
# Other sensitive files
**/prompts_master.md
**/*.bak
**/*.backup
**/*.old
# Security and Setup directories - may contain sensitive information
SECURITY/
SETUP/
# Allow setup.sh script to be tracked
!SETUP/setup.sh
# Template for pull requests
PR_TEMPLATE.md
# Local test verification scripts
backend/test-seed.js
- # Documentation
- docs/
- # Cypress
- cypress/If you need to ignore generated Cypress artifacts (e.g., /frontend/cypress/screenshots, /frontend/cypress/videos), add those specific patterns instead:
+ # Cypress generated artifacts (but keep test code, fixtures, and config)
+ /frontend/cypress/screenshots/
+ /frontend/cypress/videos/Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.gitignore around lines 112–114: the file currently ignores the entire docs/ and
cypress/ directories which will omit critical PR files (E2E docs and
frontend/cypress test suite); remove those broad ignore entries and instead, if
necessary, add specific ignore patterns for generated artifacts only (for
example frontend/cypress/screenshots and frontend/cypress/videos) so the
documentation and test sources remain version-controlled.
| 1. Identifica las credenciales afectadas. | ||
| 2. Genera nuevas credenciales en el proveedor correspondiente. | ||
| 3. Actualiza tus `.env` locales y despliegues con los nuevos valores. | ||
| 4. Revoca/elimna las credenciales antiguas. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Limpieza de historial (opcional/invasivo) | ||
|
|
||
| Para eliminar valores sensibles de la historia Git se requieren herramientas que reescriban el historial (BFG o `git filter-repo`). Esto requiere coordinación con el equipo y un `force push`. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Recomendaciones | ||
|
|
||
| - Para producción, usa servicios de gestión de secretos (Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, etc.). | ||
| - No dejes valores sensibles en archivos de código (por ejemplo en `prisma/schema.prisma`); usa `env("DATABASE_URL")` en el `schema.prisma`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Corrige pequeños typos y puntuación en la guía de .env
Hay un par de detalles menores que vale la pena ajustar:
- Línea 33:
elimna→elimina. - Opcionalmente, mejorar la lectura de la frase sobre historial de Git y el "por ejemplo".
Propuesta:
-4. Revoca/elimna las credenciales antiguas.
+4. Revoca/elimina las credenciales antiguas.
@@
-Para eliminar valores sensibles de la historia Git se requieren herramientas que reescriban el historial (BFG o `git filter-repo`). Esto requiere coordinación con el equipo y un `force push`.
+Para eliminar valores sensibles de la historia de Git, se requieren herramientas que reescriban el historial (BFG o `git filter-repo`). Esto requiere coordinación con el equipo y un `force push`.
@@
-- No dejes valores sensibles en archivos de código (por ejemplo en `prisma/schema.prisma`); usa `env("DATABASE_URL")` en el `schema.prisma`.
+- No dejes valores sensibles en archivos de código (por ejemplo, en `prisma/schema.prisma`); usa `env("DATABASE_URL")` en el `schema.prisma`.Nada crítico, pero deja el documento más pulido.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| 1. Identifica las credenciales afectadas. | |
| 2. Genera nuevas credenciales en el proveedor correspondiente. | |
| 3. Actualiza tus `.env` locales y despliegues con los nuevos valores. | |
| 4. Revoca/elimna las credenciales antiguas. | |
| ## Limpieza de historial (opcional/invasivo) | |
| Para eliminar valores sensibles de la historia Git se requieren herramientas que reescriban el historial (BFG o `git filter-repo`). Esto requiere coordinación con el equipo y un `force push`. | |
| ## Recomendaciones | |
| - Para producción, usa servicios de gestión de secretos (Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, etc.). | |
| - No dejes valores sensibles en archivos de código (por ejemplo en `prisma/schema.prisma`); usa `env("DATABASE_URL")` en el `schema.prisma`. | |
| 1. Identifica las credenciales afectadas. | |
| 2. Genera nuevas credenciales en el proveedor correspondiente. | |
| 3. Actualiza tus `.env` locales y despliegues con los nuevos valores. | |
| 4. Revoca/elimina las credenciales antiguas. | |
| ## Limpieza de historial (opcional/invasivo) | |
| Para eliminar valores sensibles de la historia de Git, se requieren herramientas que reescriban el historial (BFG o `git filter-repo`). Esto requiere coordinación con el equipo y un `force push`. | |
| ## Recomendaciones | |
| - Para producción, usa servicios de gestión de secretos (Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, etc.). | |
| - No dejes valores sensibles en archivos de código (por ejemplo, en `prisma/schema.prisma`); usa `env("DATABASE_URL")` en el `schema.prisma`. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~33-~33: Corrige el error ortográfico.
Context: ...egues con los nuevos valores. 4. Revoca/elimna las credenciales antiguas. ## Limpieza...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_SPELLING)
[grammar] ~37-~37: Agrega un signo de puntuación.
Context: ...iminar valores sensibles de la historia Git se requieren herramientas que reescriba...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)
[grammar] ~42-~42: Agrega un signo de puntuación.
Context: ...es sensibles en archivos de código (por ejemplo en prisma/schema.prisma); usa `env("D...
(QB_NEW_ES_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/ENV_USAGE.md around lines 30 to 42, fix the small typos and punctuation:
change "elimna" to "elimina" on line 33, rephrase the Git history sentence for
clarity (e.g. "Para eliminar valores sensibles del historial de Git se requieren
herramientas que reescriban el historial, como BFG o git filter-repo; esto
requiere coordinación con el equipo y un force push.") and adjust the "por
ejemplo" line to improve readability and punctuation (e.g. "No dejes valores
sensibles en archivos de código (por ejemplo, en prisma/schema.prisma); usa
env(\"DATABASE_URL\") en el schema.prisma."). Ensure accents and commas are
correct.
| Cypress.Commands.add('verifyApiCall', (alias, expectedRequest = {}, expectedResponse = null) => { | ||
| cy.get(alias).then((interception) => { | ||
| if (expectedRequest.method) { | ||
| expect(interception.request.method).to.equal(expectedRequest.method); | ||
| } | ||
| if (expectedRequest.url) { | ||
| expect(interception.request.url).to.include(expectedRequest.url); | ||
| } | ||
| if (expectedRequest.body) { | ||
| expect(interception.request.body).to.deep.include(expectedRequest.body); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (expectedResponse) { | ||
| if (expectedResponse.statusCode) { | ||
| expect(interception.response.statusCode).to.equal(expectedResponse.statusCode); | ||
| } | ||
| if (expectedResponse.body) { | ||
| expect(interception.response.body).to.deep.include(expectedResponse.body); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Incorrect usage of cy.get() for interception alias.
The verifyApiCall command uses cy.get(alias) at line 36, but Cypress aliases for intercepts must be accessed via cy.wait() or by using @ prefix with .then(). The current implementation will fail at runtime.
Apply this diff to fix:
-Cypress.Commands.add('verifyApiCall', (alias, expectedRequest = {}, expectedResponse = null) => {
- cy.get(alias).then((interception) => {
+Cypress.Commands.add('verifyApiCall', (alias, expectedRequest = {}, expectedResponse = null) => {
+ // The alias should already have been waited on with cy.wait(alias)
+ // Access the interception using @ prefix
+ cy.get(alias.startsWith('@') ? alias : `@${alias}`).then((interception) => {
if (expectedRequest.method) {Alternative approach (if the command should wait for the interception):
Cypress.Commands.add('verifyApiCall', (alias, expectedRequest = {}, expectedResponse = null) => {
- cy.get(alias).then((interception) => {
+ // Remove @ prefix if present for cy.wait()
+ const aliasName = alias.startsWith('@') ? alias : `@${alias}`;
+ cy.wait(aliasName).then((interception) => {
if (expectedRequest.method) {Note: Based on the test file usage, the first approach is likely correct as tests call cy.wait() separately before using verifyApiCall.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/cypress/support/commands.js around lines 35 to 56, the helper
incorrectly uses cy.get(alias) to access an intercept alias which will fail at
runtime; replace the cy.get(alias) call with cy.wait(alias) so the command waits
for and receives the interception object, then perform the existing
request/response assertions on that interception; ensure alias is passed in the
form of a string like '@myAlias' when calling verifyApiCall.
| navigateToPosition(positionId) { | ||
| // Buscar el botón "Ver proceso" dentro de la tarjeta de la posición | ||
| // Las tarjetas están en .card.shadow-sm y el botón está dentro | ||
| cy.get('.card.shadow-sm') | ||
| .contains('Ver proceso') | ||
| .first() | ||
| .click(); | ||
| return this; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unused positionId parameter in navigateToPosition
The method signature and JSDoc suggest navigation to a specific position by ID, but positionId is not used and the implementation just clicks the first “Ver proceso” button. This is misleading for callers and easy to misuse.
Consider either:
- Using
positionIdto target a specific card (e.g., via adata-*attribute or more specific selector), or - Removing the parameter and updating the JSDoc/name to reflect that it just opens the first available position.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/cypress/support/page-objects/PositionsListPage.js around lines 34 to
42, the navigateToPosition(positionId) function accepts a positionId but ignores
it and always clicks the first "Ver proceso" button; either use the id to target
the correct card or remove the parameter and rename the method. To fix: if you
want specific navigation, change the selector to scope to the card with the
matching identifier (e.g., find
`.card.shadow-sm[data-position-id="${positionId}"]` or a similar data-*
attribute), then call .contains('Ver proceso').click() within that card and keep
a fallback that clicks the first card when positionId is falsy; alternatively,
remove the positionId parameter and update the JSDoc and method name to reflect
it always opens the first position.
1 participant
📋 Descripción
Este PR implementa una suite completa de pruebas End-to-End (E2E) para la interfaz de gestión de posiciones utilizando Cypress y el patrón Page Object Model (POM). Las pruebas cubren todos los requisitos especificados en
docs/requirements.md, incluyendo la carga de página y la funcionalidad de drag-and-drop para cambiar fases de candidatos.🎯 Objetivos Cumplidos
✅ Carga de la Página de Position
✅ Cambio de Fase de un Candidato
📊 Estadísticas
🚀 Cambios Principales
Configuración y Setup
cypress.config.jsArquitectura Page Object Model
BasePage- Clase base con métodos comunesPositionsListPage- Page Object para lista de posicionesPositionDetailsPage- Page Object para detalles de posiciónStageColumnComponent- Component Object para columnasCandidateCardComponent- Component Object para tarjetasFixtures y Datos de Prueba
interviewFlows.json- Datos de flujo de entrevistacandidates.json- Datos de candidatos (6 candidatos distribuidos)positions.json- Datos de posicionesPruebas Implementadas
Carga de Página (7 pruebas)
Drag-and-Drop (5 pruebas)
Edge Cases y Manejo de Errores (6 pruebas)
Comandos Personalizados
cy.waitForApi()- Esperar llamadas API con timeout personalizablecy.verifyApiCall()- Verificar llamadas API con parámetros esperadoscy.shouldBeVisibleWithText()- Verificar visibilidad y textoDocumentación
docs/e2e-testing-plan.md- Plan detallado de implementacióndocs/E2E_TESTING_GUIDE.md- Guía completa de usodocs/E2E_TROUBLESHOOTING.md- Guía de solución de problemasdocs/E2E_TESTING_SUMMARY.md- Resumen del proyectofrontend/cypress/README.md- Documentación técnica📁 Archivos Modificados/Creados
Nuevos Archivos
Archivos Modificados
frontend/package.json- Agregados scripts y dependencias de Cypress.gitignore- Mejoras en reglas de exclusión🧪 Cómo Probar
Requisitos Previos
http://localhost:3000http://localhost:3010Ejecutar Pruebas
Verificar Pruebas Específicas
📚 Documentación
Toda la documentación está disponible en la carpeta
docs/:✅ Checklist
🔍 Revisión Sugerida
Al revisar este PR, por favor verifica:
📝 Notas Adicionales
🎉 Resultado
Este PR proporciona una base sólida y completa para las pruebas E2E de la interfaz Position. Todas las funcionalidades principales están cubiertas, y la arquitectura permite fácil extensión y mantenimiento.
Tiempo estimado de implementación: 26-34 horas (según plan)
Etapas completadas: 7/7 ✅
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.