Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flux-limited diffusion radiation hydrodynamics in later versions of MESA #769

Open
JRGarza opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #772
Open

Flux-limited diffusion radiation hydrodynamics in later versions of MESA #769

JRGarza opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #772

Comments

@JRGarza
Copy link

JRGarza commented Jan 24, 2025

I noticed for later versions of MESA the option use_flux_limiting_with_dPrad_dm_form has ben removed. It would be great to get it back in order to have an approximate way to model the transition from diffusion to free-streaming radiative transport. Neglecting such physical prescription makes the radiative transport in the optically thin zones less reliable.

In my current scientific cases, I use MESA 23.05.01 to inject energy in stellar envelopes to model common envelope events. When the outer envelope of the primary expands, part of its outer regions reach velocities higher than the escape velocity. But, as such regions become optically thin, the current radiative transport leads to an overestimation of the luminosity. The energy of such escaping regions is being radiated at superluminal rates, they loose their kinetic energy and become bound. These runs use the HLLC Riemann solver, do not have any artificial viscosity that could damp the kinetic energy of such regions. I did some diagnostics by calculating the flux limiter for the profiles this behaviour appears and it looks that the surface luminosity is being overestimated by several order of magnitud (depending on the configuration of the common envelope).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant