Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add name and state to ExecutionService and MultichainRouter #3058

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

Mrtenz
Copy link
Member

@Mrtenz Mrtenz commented Feb 4, 2025

This adds a name and state field to the ExecutionService and MultichainRouter, which is required for it to work with modular initialisation in the MetaMask extension.

@Mrtenz Mrtenz requested a review from a team as a code owner February 4, 2025 11:38
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.88%. Comparing base (361cd5b) to head (c99af33).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3058   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.88%   94.88%           
=======================================
  Files         506      506           
  Lines       11120    11124    +4     
  Branches     1703     1703           
=======================================
+ Hits        10551    10555    +4     
  Misses        569      569           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

FrederikBolding
FrederikBolding previously approved these changes Feb 4, 2025
@Mrtenz Mrtenz changed the title Add name and state to ExecutionService type Add name and state to ExecutionService and MultichainRouter Feb 4, 2025
FrederikBolding
FrederikBolding previously approved these changes Feb 4, 2025
@Mrtenz Mrtenz merged commit 1a1ec5e into main Feb 4, 2025
167 checks passed
@Mrtenz Mrtenz deleted the mrtenz/execution-service-name branch February 4, 2025 12:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants