Compounding liquidity #190
Open
+2,366
−1,076
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
andrewsource147
force-pushed
the
compounding_liquidity
branch
from
6f27530 to
0c4fe8c
Compare
bangyro
reviewed
Feb 11, 2026
bangyro
reviewed
Feb 11, 2026
andrewsource147
force-pushed
the
compounding_liquidity
branch
from
675bc71 to
eacd7a9
Compare
bangyro
reviewed
Feb 12, 2026
| if collect_fee_mode == CollectFeeMode::Compounding { | ||
| CompoundingLiquidity::get_initial_pool_information(sqrt_price, liquidity) | ||
| } else { | ||
| ConcenstratedLiquidity::get_initial_pool_information( |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
typo. Should be Concenstrated -> Concentrated
bangyro
reviewed
Feb 12, 2026
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
| ### Added | ||
|
|
||
| - Pool now will track reserves balances `(token_a_amount, token_b_amount)` if `pool.layout_version == 1`. For pool layout_version 0, operator can call the new endpoint `fix_pool_layout_version` to pump pool version. | ||
| - Add a new `collect_fee_mode (Compounding)`, in the new collect fee mode, fee will be collected in quote token, and a percentage of fee (configurable) will be added in reserves for compounding. In the new collect fee mode, the pool doesn't have concenstrated price range, instead following constant-product formula `token_a_amount * token_b_amount = constant`. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
typo. Should be concenstrated -> concentrated
bangyro
reviewed
Feb 12, 2026
| [toolchain] | ||
| anchor_version = "0.31.0" | ||
| solana_version = "2.1.0" | ||
| solana_version = "2.3.13" |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should update the CI to use the same version in .github/workflows/ci.yml:10
codewithgun
reviewed
Feb 12, 2026
codewithgun
reviewed
Feb 12, 2026
| ) -> Result<InitialPoolInformation> { | ||
| require!( | ||
| liquidity >= DEAD_LIQUIDITY, | ||
| liquidity > DEAD_LIQUIDITY, |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What's the reason of the change? Doesn't only DEAD_LIQUIDITY during pool initialization make sense too?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.