Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce mainnet/devnet build profiles in nix (rampup) #15027

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

georgeee
Copy link
Member

@georgeee georgeee commented Feb 2, 2024

Clone of #15026 against rampup.

To build mainnet node, use nix build mina#mainnet

For devnet node: nix build mina#devnet

Explain how you tested your changes:

  • Ran a node, checked that mainnet profile was used when compiling
  • Compared output of mina advanced constraint-system-digests between nix version and mainnet binary built by CI

Checklist:

  • Dependency versions are unchanged
    • Notify Velocity team if dependencies must change in CI
  • Modified the current draft of release notes with details on what is completed or incomplete within this project
  • Document code purpose, how to use it
    • Mention expected invariants, implicit constraints
  • Tests were added for the new behavior
    • Document test purpose, significance of failures
    • Test names should reflect their purpose
  • All tests pass (CI will check this if you didn't)
  • Serialized types are in stable-versioned modules
  • Does this close issues? None

joaosreis and others added 4 commits January 31, 2024 09:47
…er-slot-compatible

[compatible] Stop txn/network after slot feature
To build mainnet node, use `nix build mina#mainnet`

For devnet node: `nix build mina#devnet`
@georgeee
Copy link
Member Author

georgeee commented Feb 2, 2024

!ci-build-me

@georgeee
Copy link
Member Author

Not needed anymore as we are abandoning rampup

@georgeee georgeee closed this Feb 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants