Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 209: Add layers accessors #214

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Issue 209: Add layers accessors #214

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ftomassetti
Copy link
Member

See issue #209

Note that the accessors return the whole layer, then the data field has to be accessed explicitely. Also theresholds and quantiles can be accessed from the layer.

@tcld
Copy link
Contributor

tcld commented Dec 5, 2015

This looks so much nicer and cleaner than before! I have not checked every line yet.

One thing I mentioned before: Why not store the thresholds in loops? (I'll add an example comment for that.)

EDIT: I have looked at all of it now; looks good. But the setters should be part of this PR, I think.

permeability_ths_grp['low'] = world.layers['permeability'].thresholds[0][1]
permeability_ths_grp['med'] = world.layers['permeability'].thresholds[1][1]
permeability_ths_grp['low'] = world.permeability.thresholds[0][1]
permeability_ths_grp['med'] = world.permeability.thresholds[1][1]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would much prefer this when it comes to storing thresholds:

for pair in world.permeability.thresholds:
    permeability_ths_grp[pair[0]] = pair[1]

As far as I understand the item at [x][0] is a naming string anyway. So far I haven't seen those strings used anywhere - so they could be renamed to 'low', 'med' etc., if necessary. Then the stored file would be the same as before, but the whole system could be expanded/changed more easily.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants