Skip to content

[BOUNTY #1] Multi-Dimensional Quality Scoring for Structured Outputs#10

Open
dagangtj wants to merge 1 commit intoMint-Claw:mainfrom
dagangtj:feature/quality-scoring
Open

[BOUNTY #1] Multi-Dimensional Quality Scoring for Structured Outputs#10
dagangtj wants to merge 1 commit intoMint-Claw:mainfrom
dagangtj:feature/quality-scoring

Conversation

@dagangtj
Copy link

Summary

Implements multi-dimensional quality scoring algorithm for structured outputs (JSON, markdown, code, text).

Implementation

Core Features

  • ✅ Auto-detect format (JSON, markdown, code, text)
  • ✅ 5-dimensional scoring:
    • Completeness (30%): Required fields/sections present
    • Format Compliance (20%): Valid syntax, proper structure
    • Coverage (25%): Depth and breadth of content
    • Clarity (15%): Readability, organization
    • Validity (10%): Logical consistency
  • ✅ Output structure: {weighted_score, quality_rating, scores, feedback, pass_threshold}
  • ✅ Pass threshold: 0.70 (70%)

Performance

  • 100 submissions in < 0.01s (requirement: <10s)
  • Tested on MacBook Pro M1
  • Zero external dependencies (Python 3.10+ stdlib only)

Files Added

  1. quality_scorer.py - Main scoring module (500+ lines)
  2. test_quality_scorer.py - Comprehensive test suite (10 test cases)
  3. examples.py - Usage examples (5 scenarios)
  4. QUALITY_SCORING.md - Complete documentation

Test Results

✓ Format detection tests passed
✓ JSON scoring tests passed
✓ Markdown scoring tests passed
✓ Code scoring tests passed
✓ Text scoring tests passed
✓ Performance test passed: 100 submissions in 0.00s
✓ Edge case tests passed
✓ Dimension scoring tests passed
✓ Quality rating tests passed
✓ Feedback generation tests passed

✅ All tests passed!

Usage Example

from quality_scorer import QualityScorer

scorer = QualityScorer()
result = scorer.score(content)

print(f"Score: {result.weighted_score}")
print(f"Rating: {result.quality_rating}")
print(f"Pass: {result.pass_threshold}")

Sample Output

{
  "weighted_score": 0.847,
  "quality_rating": "A",
  "scores": {
    "completeness": 0.900,
    "format": 1.000,
    "coverage": 0.850,
    "clarity": 0.750,
    "validity": 0.800
  },
  "feedback": [
    "Detected format: json",
    "JSON structure has good depth",
    "Well-formatted with proper indentation"
  ],
  "pass_threshold": true
}

Testing

# Run tests
python3 test_quality_scorer.py

# Run examples
python3 examples.py

Checklist

  • ✅ Auto-detect format (JSON, markdown, code, text)
  • ✅ Score all 5 dimensions with correct weights
  • ✅ 100 submissions < 10s (achieved < 0.01s)
  • ✅ Output structure matches specification
  • ✅ Comprehensive test suite
  • ✅ Documentation and examples
  • ✅ Zero external dependencies

Closes #1

- Implement QualityScorer with 5-dimensional scoring algorithm
- Auto-detect format (JSON, markdown, code, text)
- Score dimensions: Completeness (30%), Format (20%), Coverage (25%), Clarity (15%), Validity (10%)
- Output: weighted_score, quality_rating, scores, feedback, pass_threshold
- Performance: 100 submissions < 0.01s (requirement: <10s)
- Comprehensive test suite with 10 test cases
- Examples and documentation

Fixes Mint-Claw#1
@dagangtj
Copy link
Author

Hey! Wanted to follow up — the multi-dimensional quality scoring system is ready for review. Let me know if there's anything you'd like me to tweak. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BOUNTY $10] Multi-Dimensional Quality Scoring for Structured Outputs

1 participant