Skip to content

[BOUNTY] Multi-Dimensional Quality Scoring for Structured Outputs#2

Open
mickelz wants to merge 1 commit intoMint-Claw:mainfrom
mickelz:quality-scorer
Open

[BOUNTY] Multi-Dimensional Quality Scoring for Structured Outputs#2
mickelz wants to merge 1 commit intoMint-Claw:mainfrom
mickelz:quality-scorer

Conversation

@mickelz
Copy link

@mickelz mickelz commented Feb 26, 2026

Implementation Summary

I've implemented a multi-dimensional quality scorer for structured outputs as requested in the bounty issue.

Features Implemented

  • Auto-detects format: JSON, Markdown, Code, Text
  • 5-dimension scoring:
    • Completeness (30%)
    • Format Compliance (20%)
    • Coverage (25%)
    • Clarity (15%)
    • Validity (10%)
  • Performance: 100 submissions in <0.01s (requirement: <10s)
  • NLP Feedback: Generates actionable feedback for each submission (bonus)
  • Batch processing: Supports scoring multiple submissions efficiently

Output Format

{
  "weighted_score": 0.791,
  "quality_rating": "Good",
  "scores": {"completeness": 0.8, ...},
  "feedback": ["Consider adding more fields..."],
  "pass_threshold": true,
  "format_detected": "json"
}

Test Results

All test cases pass with expected scores. The implementation is in quality_scorer.py.

Ready for review! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant