Skip to content

Conversation

reeeborn33
Copy link
Contributor

@reeeborn33 reeeborn33 commented Sep 29, 2025

🔗 相关问题 / Related Issue

Issue 链接 / Issue Link: #326

  • 我已经创建了相关 Issue 并进行了讨论 / I have created and discussed the related issue
  • 这是一个微小的修改(如错别字),不需要 Issue / This is a trivial change (like typo fix) that doesn't need an issue

📋 变更类型 / Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug 修复 / Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ✨ 新功能 / New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 破坏性变更 / Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • 📚 文档更新 / Documentation update
  • 🔧 重构 / Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • ⚡ 性能优化 / Performance improvement
  • 📦 依赖升级 / Dependency upgrade (update dependencies to newer versions)
  • 🚀 功能增强 / Feature enhancement (improve existing functionality without breaking changes)
  • 🧹 代码清理 / Code cleanup

📝 变更目的 / Purpose of the Change

📋 主要变更 / Brief Changelog

  • 新增直接回复节点,可以配置节点输入和直接回复的文本

🧪 验证变更 / Verifying this Change

测试步骤 / Test Steps

  1. 添加直接回复节点,可以设置输入和直接回复
  2. 后续节点中没有直接回复的输出

测试覆盖 / Test Coverage

  • 我已经添加了单元测试 / I have added unit tests
  • 所有现有测试都通过 / All existing tests pass
  • 我已经进行了手动测试 / I have performed manual testing

📸 截图 / Screenshots

image

✅ 贡献者检查清单 / Contributor Checklist

请确保你的 Pull Request 符合以下要求 / Please ensure your Pull Request meets the following requirements:

基本要求 / Basic Requirements:

  • 确保有 GitHub Issue 对应这个变更(微小变更如错别字除外)/ Make sure there is a Github issue filed for the change (trivial changes like typos excluded)
  • 你的 Pull Request 只解决一个 Issue,没有包含其他不相关的变更 / Your PR addresses just this issue, without pulling in other changes - one PR resolves one issue
  • PR 中的每个 commit 都有有意义的主题行和描述 / Each commit in the PR has a meaningful subject line and body

代码质量 / Code Quality:

  • 我的代码遵循项目的代码规范 / My code follows the project's coding standards
  • 我已经进行了自我代码审查 / I have performed a self-review of my code
  • 我已经为复杂的代码添加了必要的注释 / I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas

测试要求 / Testing Requirements:

  • 我已经编写了必要的单元测试来验证逻辑正确性 / I have written necessary unit-tests to verify the logic correction
  • 当存在跨模块依赖时,我尽量使用了 mock / I have used mocks when cross-module dependencies exist
  • 基础检查通过:mvn -B clean package -Dmaven.test.skip=true,elsa README 中的编译检查 / Basic checks pass
  • 单元测试通过:mvn clean install / Unit tests pass

文档和兼容性 / Documentation and Compatibility:

  • 我已经更新了相应的文档 / I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • 如果有破坏性变更,我已经在 PR 描述中详细说明 / If there are breaking changes, I have documented them in detail
  • 我已经考虑了向后兼容性 / I have considered backward compatibility

📋 附加信息 / Additional Notes


审查者注意事项 / Reviewer Notes:

@reeeborn33 reeeborn33 marked this pull request as ready for review September 30, 2025 03:37
@reeeborn33 reeeborn33 self-assigned this Sep 30, 2025
@reeeborn33 reeeborn33 added in: elsa Issues in Elsa modules type: feature A general feature labels Sep 30, 2025
@reeeborn33 reeeborn33 added this to Nova Sep 30, 2025
@reeeborn33 reeeborn33 modified the milestones: elsa 0.4.3, elsa 0.5.0 Sep 30, 2025
@reeeborn33 reeeborn33 linked an issue Sep 30, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: elsa Issues in Elsa modules type: feature A general feature
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

elsa增加直接回复节点
3 participants