Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add Coding subdirectory, #31

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

BobHanson
Copy link

Description

Adds a place for C++ or Java code development; adds Jmol's QC-JSON reader and writer; adds a generally-useful Java class for working with QC-Schema units and unit conversion.

Questions

  • Question1

Status

  • Ready to go

Copy link
Collaborator

@dgasmith dgasmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think something like this is a good idea; however, there should be much more documentation for folks to really get a handle on what it is doing.

In addition, you have deleted our submodules from the Examples folder. Please undo this.

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please delete this file.

@@ -0,0 +1,377 @@
package org.jmol.adapter.readers.quantum;

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we simply put this in a Coding/Java/... folder. The additional nesting too much I would think.

/**
* Read basis and orbital information.
*
* @param molecular_orbitals
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we provide much more information of what the molecular_orbitals object entails?

+ Viewer.getJmolVersion().replace(' ', '_');

//
// source: http://cccbdb.nist.gov/hartree.asp
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is quite limiting in terms of accuracy. Please see here for better precision:
https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants