Update DONTREADME.md

DONTREADME.md

@@ -2,11 +2,26 @@
 
 User xi (Tobias Bengfort) created the parent repo, which is unfortunately filled with misconceptions and spurious assertions regarding readability, human perception of contrast, and APCA. Many things written at the parent repo are in error, misleading, false, or a complete misunderstanding.
 
-The "analysis" page corrupts the math in a beligerant attempt to crudely and incorrectly reverse-engineer APCA, and is making unauthorized claims and false assertions. It's pretty gross, actually. This fork is intended to set the record straight.
+His "analysis" page corrupts the math in a beligerant attempt to crudely and incorrectly reverse-engineer APCA, and is making unauthorized claims and false assertions. This fork is intended to set the record straight.
 
 ## *The Truth Is Clear*
 Anyone with actual experience and knowledge in the field of vision science will clearly recognize the problems with Bengfort's faux analysis. My concern is that xi is using complicated yet meaningless math to support his spurious assertions, which could create confusion and misunderstanding among many. On further investigation there appears the intention, by certain members of the small group of corporate obstructionists, to use Bengfort's repo as a reference furthering the direct interference with the development and continued research of visual readability.
 
 WCAG 2.x contrast SCs are well known to be wrong, we have proven that they cause more problems than they claim to solve. If somebody is objecting to changing WCAG 2.x contrast, ask yourself what their actual underlying motivation is. Most of these objections appear to be coming from within certain corporations who have a vested interest in the status quo.
 
 ### Readability is too important to society at large to allow such obstruction to continue.
+
+## Also in this repo
+[Derailed analysis of APCA](https://github.com/Myndex/apca-introduction/blob/main/analysis.md) a rebuttal to xi's _"Detailed analysis of APCA"_ which mischaracterizes the differences between various contrast measures.
+
+[Math, Lies, and Videotape](https://github.com/Myndex/apca-introduction/blob/main/Math_Lies_and_Video.md) Or put another way, _"How xi uses math to lie"_. This is a response to a lengthy blog post xi made that is rife with errors and misconceptions, and only serves to confuse and not enlighten on the topic.
+
+There are also a large number of issues posted at xi's repo, objecting to the misleading information. Tobias has closed many of them without action, so if reviewing, include the closed issues. Tobias has attempted to foster misinformation to other repos and to other vision scientists, who have summarily shut him down. His motivation is unclear, however some links he uses appear to tie him to a certain group of cognitively-dissonant obstructionists.
+
+## *In a nutshell:*
+To be sure, vision science is a dense, complicated, and abstract subject that is difficult to understand. And the misunderstandings presented by xi/Tobias potentially have a very negative effect toward fostering the continued misunderstandings and myths surrounding vision and contrast that exist today, particularly within the accessibility community. 
+
+### It is a primary goal of our research to educate and promote the truthful understanding of the important characteristics of vision as they apply to readability and accessibility for all humankind.
+
+-----
+APCA began as a research project to address the serious failings of WCAG 2.x contrast, beginning with [Thread 695](https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/695) linked here for historical purposes.