Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update nnpdf40 runcard and add theory 40_000_000 #2082

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 20, 2024

Conversation

scarlehoff
Copy link
Member

As promised in last week's PC.

Incidentally, this PR also solves a security issue we had in the code.

Fixes #2075

I'd like to run a fit to check that everything is ok but don't have the resources available atm. Will come later today or tomorrow.

@scarlehoff scarlehoff added the run-fit-bot Starts fit bot from a PR. label May 16, 2024
@scarlehoff scarlehoff added run-fit-bot Starts fit bot from a PR. and removed run-fit-bot Starts fit bot from a PR. labels May 16, 2024
Copy link

Greetings from your nice fit 🤖 !
I have good news for you, I just finished my tasks:

Check the report carefully, and please buy me a ☕ , or better, a GPU 😉!

@scarlehoff scarlehoff removed the run-fit-bot Starts fit bot from a PR. label May 17, 2024
@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member Author

Comparison https://vp.nnpdf.science/2Fw_aIEDT3amjUe8rDsBBA==

This is ready now.


sampling:
separate_multiplicative: false
Copy link
Member Author

@scarlehoff scarlehoff May 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is necessary to get the exact comparison of my comment but I believe that this should be the default going forward

@andreab1997 @RoyStegeman

(it should not be a big or relevant effect and I guess you are using it anyway, but it could have an effect in the closure tests)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I believe that we should remove this key now, and just enforcing the correct behaviour.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From this conversation I understood the default would be set to False such that it would allow us to remove these lines from the runcard, but instead just a comment was added

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've added a comment in this PR and we take the default out in a different one (actually, @andreab1997 if you want to do the honors :P)

@scarlehoff scarlehoff merged commit 23fb1dc into master May 20, 2024
6 checks passed
@scarlehoff scarlehoff deleted the create_40_newtheory branch May 20, 2024 09:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Prepare a runcard with the exact 4.0 MHOU / QED / N3LO settings
3 participants