Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

format C++ code with clang format #547

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ChristineStawitz-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Contributor

Instructions for code reviewer

Hello reviewer, thanks for taking the time to review this PR!

  • Please use this checklist during your review, checking off items that you have verified are complete!
  • For PRs that don't make changes to code (e.g., changes to README.md or Github actions workflows), feel free to skip over items on the checklist that are not relevant. Remember it is still important to do a thorough review.
  • Then, comment on the pull request with your review indicating where you have questions or changes need to be made before merging.
  • Remember to review every line of code you’ve been asked to review, look at the context, make sure you’re improving code health, and compliment developers on good things that they do.
  • PR reviews are a great way to learn, so feel free to share your tips and tricks. However, for optional changes (i.e., not required for merging), please include nit: (for nitpicking) before making the suggestion. For example, nit: I prefer using a data.frame() instead of a matrix because...
  • Engage with the developer when they respond to comments and check off additional boxes as they become complete so the PR can be merged in when all the tasks are fulfilled. Make it clear when this has been reached by commenting on the PR with something like This PR is now ready to be merged, no changes needed.

Checklist

  • The PR is requested to be merged into the appropriate branch (typically main)
  • The code is well-designed.
  • The functionality is good for the users of the code.
  • Any User Interface changes are sensible and look good.
  • The code isn’t more complex than it needs to be.
  • Code coverage remains high, indicating the new code is tested.
  • The developer used clear names for everything.
  • Comments are clear and useful, and mostly explain why instead of what.
  • Code is appropriately documented (doxygen and roxygen).

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 14, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.73684% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.38%. Comparing base (895d728) to head (77c91e1).

Files Patch % Lines
...de/interface/rcpp/rcpp_objects/rcpp_population.hpp 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #547      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.33%   75.38%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        2092     2096       +4     
  Branches      141      141              
==========================================
+ Hits         1576     1580       +4     
  Misses        473      473              
  Partials       43       43              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ChristineStawitz-NOAA ChristineStawitz-NOAA merged commit 97281c2 into main Feb 29, 2024
13 checks passed
@ChristineStawitz-NOAA ChristineStawitz-NOAA deleted the format-c++-code branch February 29, 2024 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants