-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 434
Fix DOAS system sizing and add reporting #10783
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9646be1
Fix DOAS system sizing and add reporting
EnergyArchmage 2004713
fix unit test in AirLoopDOAS
EnergyArchmage fd57c82
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/origin/develop' into 10782-DOAS…
mjwitte c1ed440
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/origin/develop' into 10782-DOAS…
mjwitte e158a61
Merge develop, resolve conflict [decent_ci_skip] [actions skip]
Myoldmopar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Most (all?) other equipment reports sizing as "Design Size Air Flow Rate [m3/s]" or "Design Size Maximum Air Flow Rate". This should probably use similar language. @rraustad ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Usually it's "Design Size" or User-Specified" pre-pended on the front end of the field names which are not uniform. But this object doesn't have a field for air flow so it's a sum of this field. I have no preference for this object since it's not autosized or hard-sized but I guess it could match what the air loop reports since that's what gets summed.
The air loop doesn't follow this naming convention either.
Unitary System looks like this:
TUs:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually it's this field that gets summed: