Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

attic-client: 0-unstable-2024-10-04 -> 0-unstable-2024-10-06 #346759

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

r-ryantm
Copy link
Contributor

@r-ryantm r-ryantm commented Oct 6, 2024

Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from passthru.updateScript.

meta.description for attic-client is: Multi-tenant Nix Binary Cache

meta.homepage for attic-client is: https://github.com/zhaofengli/attic

Updates performed
  • Ran passthru.UpdateScript
To inspect upstream changes
Impact

Checks done


  • built on NixOS
  • The tests defined in passthru.tests, if any, passed
  • found 0-unstable-2024-10-06 in filename of file in /nix/store/z70a85zr3d2fxh6g24kxb7yyd8a8d9vy-attic-0-unstable-2024-10-06

Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
3 total rebuild path(s)

3 package rebuild(s)

First fifty rebuilds by attrpath

attic-client
attic-server
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)

Either download from Cachix:

nix-store -r /nix/store/z70a85zr3d2fxh6g24kxb7yyd8a8d9vy-attic-0-unstable-2024-10-06 \
  --option binary-caches 'https://cache.nixos.org/ https://nix-community.cachix.org/' \
  --option trusted-public-keys '
  nix-community.cachix.org-1:mB9FSh9qf2dCimDSUo8Zy7bkq5CX+/rkCWyvRCYg3Fs=
  cache.nixos.org-1:6NCHdD59X431o0gWypbMrAURkbJ16ZPMQFGspcDShjY=
  '

(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the trusted-users list or you can use sudo since root is effectively trusted.

Or, build yourself:

nix-build -A attic-client https://github.com/r-ryantm/nixpkgs/archive/fc904bd03134e098bd2fec7cc61e6ac148aad392.tar.gz

Or:

nix build github:r-ryantm/nixpkgs/fc904bd03134e098bd2fec7cc61e6ac148aad392#attic-client

After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:

ls -la /nix/store/z70a85zr3d2fxh6g24kxb7yyd8a8d9vy-attic-0-unstable-2024-10-06
ls -la /nix/store/z70a85zr3d2fxh6g24kxb7yyd8a8d9vy-attic-0-unstable-2024-10-06/bin


Pre-merge build results

We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.

This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.

Result of nixpkgs-review run on x86_64-linux 1

2 packages built:
  • attic-client
  • attic-server

Maintainer pings

cc @zhaofengli @aciceri for testing.

Tip

As a maintainer, if your package is located under pkgs/by-name/*, you can comment @NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge to automatically merge this update using the nixpkgs-merge-bot.


Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@jzbor
Copy link
Contributor

jzbor commented Oct 7, 2024

It would be great if recent changes cloud be picked up, since the recent version broke my system config (using 24.05). See also zhaofengli/attic#181.

With the current version breaking actual setups it would be great if it could then be backported rather quickly...

@zhaofengli
Copy link
Member

I opened #347103 to supersede this.

It would be great if recent changes cloud be picked up, since the recent version broke my system config (using 24.05). See also zhaofengli/attic#181.

With the current version breaking actual setups it would be great if it could then be backported rather quickly...

The version currently in nixpkgs doesn't have zhaofengli/attic#177 so I think it's unrelated. This PR will bring it in, and we don't want to bump to a version with known regressions.

@zhaofengli zhaofengli closed this Oct 7, 2024
@r-ryantm r-ryantm deleted the auto-update/attic-client branch October 8, 2024 00:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants