Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TA#75545 [14.0][CHG] project_material_purchase_link : hide task_id from PO lines by default #520

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

abenzbiria
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (4c5e2c5) 5772 5625 97.45%
Head commit (e434481) 5772 (+0) 5625 (+0) 97.45% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#520) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

@abenzbiria abenzbiria requested a review from qtiplb February 25, 2025 02:59
@lanto-razafindrabe lanto-razafindrabe merged commit 741cb47 into 14.0 Feb 25, 2025
6 checks passed
@lanto-razafindrabe lanto-razafindrabe deleted the TA#75545 branch February 25, 2025 03:32
@lanto-razafindrabe lanto-razafindrabe changed the title TA#75545 hide task_id from PO lines by default TA#75545 [14.0][CHG] project_material_purchase_link : hide task_id from PO lines by default Feb 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants