Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][FIX] hr_timesheet_sheet: Don't merge timesheets during onchange #664

Merged

Conversation

hbrunn
Copy link
Member

@hbrunn hbrunn commented Mar 28, 2024

see #662

Copy link
Member

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ocabot merge patch

Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Jul 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Sep 1, 2024
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza reopened this Sep 2, 2024
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 16.0 milestone Sep 2, 2024
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-664-by-pedrobaeza-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit f2ef79d into OCA:16.0 Sep 2, 2024
16 of 17 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at aaf0b28. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged 🎉 stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants