Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CI matrix #257

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update CI matrix #257

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

berezovskyi
Copy link
Member

@berezovskyi berezovskyi commented Dec 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for .NET 10.0 in the testing workflow configuration.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated project file modifications to dynamically target the appropriate .NET version, including the new .NET 10.0.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces support for .NET 10.0 in the GitHub Actions workflow configuration. A new matrix entry is added to the workflow, enabling testing and building against the latest .NET framework version. The workflow modification allows dynamic targeting of the new framework by updating project file configurations to replace version references automatically.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/main.yml Added .NET 10.0 support to job matrix with { setup: "10.x", target: "net10.0" }

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's workflow dance begins anew,
.NET 10 joins the testing crew
Matrix expands with digital might
Frameworks evolving, oh so bright!
Code hops forward with joyful glee 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 175fac2 and d4d0ab8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/main.yml (1)

53-53: Verify .NET 10 SDK availability and compatibility

Adding .NET 10.0 to the test matrix might be premature as it's not yet officially released. This could cause CI failures.

Consider one of these approaches:

  1. Add .NET 10 behind a conditional that checks for SDK availability
  2. Wait until .NET 10 is officially released
  3. Use preview versions explicitly with setup: "10.0.0-preview.1"

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 45.07%. Comparing base (175fac2) to head (d4d0ab8).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #257   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   45.07%   45.07%           
=======================================
  Files         159      159           
  Lines       16147    16147           
  Branches     1205     1205           
=======================================
  Hits         7278     7278           
  Misses       8561     8561           
  Partials      308      308           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant